20Jan 2017

AUTOGENOUS VERSUS COMPOSITE GRAFT FOR THE AUGMENTATION OF ANTERIOR MAXILLA PRIOR TO IMPLANT PLACEMENT – A COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Aim:To evaluate the efficacy of autogenous and composite graft in anterior maxilla for implant placement. Material and methods: A prospective, double blinded, randomised controlled study was conducted among 10 subjects between 2014 and 2015 who sustained injury due to road traffic accident associated with avulsion of anterior maxillary teeth and loss of labial cortical bone. These subjects were randomly categorized into two groups. Group A consisted of 5 subjects in whom autogenous chin graft was used to augment anterior maxilla while in Group B having another 5 subjects, composite graft (mixture ofcrushed alveolar bone andallograft - Bi-Oss powder) was used. All the patients were evaluated clinically for donor and recipient site morbidity, healing of soft tissue, and amount of bone formed with resorption pattern radiographically. Results: There was no significant recipient site morbidity found in Group B, whereas in Group A all subjects manifested with mild swelling and pain (Visual analog sale score >3 on 10cm scale) and 1 subject has mild paresthesia of lower lip for few weeks. Conclusion: Both the types of grafts used for augmentation of anterior maxilla prior to implant placement presented with the same amount of bone formation, graft resorption and healing of soft tissues. However, there was a difference noticed in recipient site morbidity and torque obtained which was in favour of using a composite graft.

  1. Brinemark P-I, Adell R, Albrektsson T, et al. An experimental and clinical study of osseointegrated implants penetrating the nasal cavity and maxillary sinus. J Oral MaxillofacSurg 1984; 42:497-505.
  2. Lidstrom RD, Symington JM. Osseointegrated dental implants in conjunction with bone grafts. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg 1988; 47:116-118.
  3. Nicholas Toscano, Nicholas Shumaker, Dan Holtzclaw. The Art of Block Grafting A Review of the Surgical Protocol for Reconstruction of alveolar Ridge Deficiency.J Implant AdvClin Dent. 2010;2:2.
  4. Jensen OT, Greer R: Immediate placement of osseointegrating implants into the maxillary sinus augmented with mineralized cancellous allograft and Gore-Tex: Second-stage surgical and histologic findings, in Laney WR, Tolman DE (eds): Tissue Integration in Oral OrthMaxillo Recon. 1992; 322.
  5. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein. Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity: a statistical evaluation. Spine. 1995;20: 1055–1060.
  6. Sorni Marco, Guarinos Juan et al (2005) Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic upper jaw: a review of the literature since 1999. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 10:E45–E56.
  7. Misch CM. Autogenous bone grafting for dental implants. In: Fonseca RJ, Turvery TA, Marciani RD, editors. 2nd edition. Oral and maxillofacial surgery, vol. 1. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co; 2008. p. 344–70. Chapter 24.
  8. Misch CM,Misch CE, Resnik RR, Ismail YH.Reconstruction of maxillary alveolar defects with mandibular symphysis grafts for dental implants: a preliminary procedural report.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992 ;7(3):360-6
  9. Harry Dym, David Huang, Avichai Stern Alveolar Bone Grafting and Reconstruction Procedures Prior to Implant Placement. Dent Clin N Am. 2012;56:209–218.
  10. Zouhary K. Bone graft harvesting from distant sites: concepts and techniques.OralMaxillofacSurgClin North Am 2010;22(3):301–14.
  11. Jaime Clavero, Stefan Lundgren, Ramus or Chin Grafts for Maxillary Sinus Inlay and Local Onlay Augmentation: Comparison of Donor Site Morbidity and Complications. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res, 2003; 5, 3.
  12. Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Handt S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillo Implants, 2001; 16(1):23-33.
  13. Misch CM, Misch CE, Resnik RR. Reconstruction of maxillary alveolar defects with mandibular symphysis grafts for dental implants: A preliminary procedural report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:360,
  14. DoganDolanmaz, AlparslanEsen, GulsunY?ld?r?m, and OzgurInan. The use of autogenous mandibular bone block grafts for reconstruction of alveolar defects.AnnMaxillofac Surg. 2015; 5(1): 71–76.
  1. Ozaki W, Buchman SR. Volume maintenance of onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton: Micro-architecture versus embryologic origin.PlastReconstr Surg. 1998;102:291–9
  2. Hising P, Bolin A, Branting CThe Private Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.Int J Oral Maxillo Implants2001; 16(1):90-97.
  3. Nicola U. Zitzmann Treatment of Angular Bone Defects with a Composite Bone Grafting Material in Combination with a Collagen Membrane. J Periodontol 2003, Vol. 74, No. 5,687-694.

[JADHAV PRANAVI, DHUSHYANTH PAUL, ANMOL AGARWAL (2017); AUTOGENOUS VERSUS COMPOSITE GRAFT FOR THE AUGMENTATION OF ANTERIOR MAXILLA PRIOR TO IMPLANT PLACEMENT – A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Jan). 51-56] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Jadhav pranavi

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/2719      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/2719

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 36 | No. of Views: 92