18Feb 2017

THE INVESTIGATION OF GRATIFICATION CRIME: AN ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IN INDONESIA.

  • Manokwari Law School, Jl. KaryaAbri, Sanggeng, Manokwari, West Papua 98312, Indonesia.
  • Graduate School, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan KM.10, Makassar, South Sulawesi 90245, Indonesia.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This study examines the essence of investigation authority against gratification crimes. This study aimed to provide an overview of the synchronization and harmonization of investigation systems on gratification in criminal law enforcement in Indonesia. The study was carried out by using a normative research, primary legal, secondary and tertiary materials, with deductive-reasoning method. The results of study showed that the investigative authority against corruption in general and gratification in particular are given the responsibility to the police, judiciary and the Corruption Eradication Commission of Indonesia. The third of law enforcement agencies, in addition to the authority to conduct investigations, was also given authority as coordinator, supervisor and controller of gratification crime investigation under the Act that became the legal basis respectively. Act that become investigation basis for both judiciary and the Corruption Eradication Commission rule out the concept of coordination and supervision as defined in the provisions of the Criminal Procedure General in this regard is the Code of Criminal Procedure. Therefore, the concept of inter-agency coordination, in addition not have a strong legal foundation is also a potential conflict of interest and the main obstacle in law enforcement against gratification crime.


  1. Arie, M. (2016). An Approach of Legisprudence Theory to Assess the Quality of Local Regulation.Hasanuddin Law Review, 2(3), 371-384. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v2i3.699
  2. Andi Hamzah. (1983).PengantarHukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
  3. BardaNawawiArief. (2011).KapitaSelektaHukumPidanatentangSistemPeradilanPidanaTerpadu(Integrated Criminal Justice System). Semarang: Diponegoro University Press.
  4. ErmansyahDjaja. (2009). MemberantasKorupsiBersama KPK.KomisiPemberantasanKorupsi, Jakarta:SinarGrafika.
  5. EviHartanti. (2007). TindakPidanaKorupsi:2nd Edition. Jakarta: SinarGrafika.
  6. Faisal Salam. (2001). Hukum Acara PidanaDalamTeoridanPraktik, Bandung: MandarMaju.
  7. HibnuNugroho, 2008, EfektivitasFungsiKoordinasidanSupervisidalamPenyidikanTindakPidanaKorupsiolehKomisiPemberantasanKorupsi, (Paper).Purwokerto: UniversitasJenderalSoedirman.
  8. Indriyanto Seno Adji. (2001).ArahSistemPeradilanPidana. Jakarta: Prof. Oemar Seno Adji, S.H & Law firm.
  9. KomisiPemberantasanKorupsi. (2015).PedomanPengendalianGratifikasi, Jakarta: KPK.
  10. Larry J. Siegel and Joseph J. Senna. (2007).Essentials of Criminal Justice. USA: Thomson Learning.
  11. Marwan Efendi. (2005), Kejaksaan R.I, PosisidanFungsinyadalamPerspektifHukum, Jakarta: Gramedia.
  12. Mispansyah, Said Karim,Harustiati A. Moein Irwansyah. “Justice in Granting Remission for Corruption Prisoners (A Review of Indonesian Criminal Justice System).” International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(11): 208-213
  13. A.F. Lamintang. (1984).Dasar-dasarHukumPidana Indonesia, First edition. Bandung: SinarBaru.
  14. Roy, Subir Kumar. (2016). "Consumer Justice: A Symbol of Economic Prosperity and Social Progressiveness." Hasanuddin Law Review,2(2): 170-181. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1n2.302
  15. SoerjonoSoekanto. (2008). Faktor-faktor Yang MempengaruhiPenegakanHukum, Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  16. SoewarnoHandayaningrat. (2002). PengantarStudiAdministrasidan Management, Jakarta: GunungAgung.
  17. Sukardi. (2005).IllegalLoggingdalam PerspektifPolitikHukumPidana: KasusPapua, Yogyakarta: UniversitasAtmaJayaPress.
  18. Hani Handoko. (2003). Manajemen. 2nd Edition. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  19. United Nations Convention Againts Corruption, 2003.

[Andi Muliyono, Syamsul Bachri, Andi Sofyan and M. Said Karim. (2017); THE INVESTIGATION OF GRATIFICATION CRIME: AN ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IN INDONESIA. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Feb). 433-440] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Andi Muliyono
Manokwari Law School

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3168      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3168