22Apr 2017

A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT SOLUTION APPROACHES FOR A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF HEMODIALYSIS.

  • Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mirpur-10250(AJK ), Pakistan.
  • Government Postgraduate College No 1, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Mathematical models were developed to gain a better understanding of many biological processes. The basic aim of present study was to establish a new technique in order to solve problems in the field of mathematical modeling. A mathematical model for hemodialysis with some modification was reviewed in this study. Different mathematical techniques, Laplace Transforms, Eigenvalue, and integrating factor for linear differential equations of the model were used, in all cases unique solution were obtained for dialytic interval.


  1. Agar, JW., K. Mahadevan, R. Knight, ML. Antonis, and CA. Somerville. (2005). Flexible or Lifestyle Dialysis: Is this the Way Forward. Nephrology. 10(5): 525-529.doi:10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00473.x
  2. Beddhu, S., LM.Pappas, N. Ramkumar, and M. Samore (2003).Effects of Body Size and Body Composition on Survival in Hemodialysis Patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 14: 2366-2372.
  3. doi:1097/01.ASN.0000083905.72794.E6
  4. Boer, P (1984). Estimated Lean Body Mass as an Index for Normalization of Body Fluid Volumes in Humans. J .Physiol. Cell Physiol. 247(4): 632-636.
  5. Conway, B., and A. Rene (2004). Obesity as a Disease: No Lightweight Matter. Obesity Reviews .5(3): 145-151.
  6. CroninFine, D., F. Gotch, N. Levin, P. Kotanko, and M. Lysaght (2007).A Mathematical Model Comparing Solute Kinetics in Low- and High-BMI Hemodialysis Patients. Int. J. Art. Org. 30(11): 1000-1007.
  7. Port, FK., VB. Ashby, RK. Dhingra, EC. Roys, and RA. Wolfe (2002). Dialysis Dose and Body Mass Index are Strongly Associated with Survival in Hemodialysis Patients.J. Am. Soc. Nephrol .13(4): 1061-1066.
  8. Sarkar, SR., MK. Kuhlmann, Kotanko , F. Zhu ,? SB. Heymsfield, J. Wang, IS., Meisels, FA. Gotch, GA. Kaysen, and MW. Levin (2006).Metabolic Consequences of Body Composition in Hemodialysis Patients. Kidney Int. 70(10): 1832-1839.
  9. Schneditz, D., and J. T. Daugridas (2001). Compartment Effect in hemodialysis.Semin Dial.14( 4):? 271-277.
  10. Stephen, B., R. Unwin, and C. C. Yengc (2000).? Mathematical Modelling of Profiled Haemodialysis: A Simplified Approach. J. Theor. Med. 3: 143-160.
  11. Wolfe, RA., Vb. Ashby, JT. Daugridas, LY. Agodoa, CA. Jones, and FK.Port (2000).Body Sizes, Dose of Hemodialysis, and Mortality. Kidn. Dis.35(1): 80-88
  12. Ziolko, ,? J. A. Pietrzyk,? and J. Grabska, Chrzastowaska (2000). Accuracy of Hemodialysis Modeling. Kidney Int. 57( 3): 1152-1163.

[R. Hussain, A. Ali, Mohammad Munir and Sadia Nasar. (2017); A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT SOLUTION APPROACHES FOR A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF HEMODIALYSIS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Apr). 390-398] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Sadia Nasar
Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mirpur-10250(AJK ), Pakistan.

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3823      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3823