17Jul 2017

RECONSTRUCTION OF SANCTIONS ON MEDICAL PROFESSION THAT HARM PATIENTS BASED ON JUSTICE VALUE.

  • Student of the Doctoral Law Program, Sultan Agung Islamic University Semarang, Jalan Raya Kaligawe Km 4 Semarang Indonesia 50112
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

If a patient feels aggrieved by the practice of medicine can make a complaint to the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board. Complaints to the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board do not diminish the patient's right to report the physician for alleged criminal acts to the authorities and or to sue for civil injury to the court. Giving sanctions to the medical profession is not considered to meet the value of justice. Reconstruction of several Articles in Law number 29 of 2004 on Medical Practice is indispensable, among others: Article 3 a Medical Practice Law and Article 66 paragraph (3) of Medical Practice Law and Article 69 paragraph (3) of Medical Practice Law. In article 66 paragraph (3) explains that any violation of the medical profession must first be terminated through Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board institution. The process of complaint is the author called "One Door Court." In order for the theory of one-door justice can run effectively then required Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board provincial and district throughout Indonesia. Reconstruction type of sanction (Article 69 paragraph (3)) intended for the implementation of sanctioning the medical profession always mengedapankan prophetic justice that is justice based on Belief in God Almighty.


  1. Agus Purwadianto, Kaidah Dasar Moral Dan Teori Etika Dalam Membingkai Tanggungjawab Profesi?Kedokteran, https://mymodul.wordpress.com/ 2011/01/18/kaidah-dasar-moral-dan-teori-etika-dalam-membingkai-tanggungjawab-profesi-kedokteran/
  2. Aryanto Kush Anjawani, Memorandum untuk Komisi Yudisial, http://lenterahukum.com/?p=24
  3. Asep Oustom, Batasan Ruang Lingkup Hukum Kesehatan, https://chevichenko.wordpress.com/2009/11/28/batasan-ruang-lingkup-hukum-kesehatan/
  4. Elyani, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Kesehatan Dalam Hal Terjadi?Malpraktik, https://jmmymartin.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/perlindungan-hukum-bagi-konsumen-kesehatan-dalam-hal-terjadi-malpraktik/
  5. Fitri, Profesi Dokter: Definisi, Kompetensi Dasar dan Tugas Dokter, http://sehat.link/definisi-dan-sejarah-terbentuknya-profesi-dokter.info
  6. Tengker, 1993, Hukum Suatu Pendekatan Elementer, Bandung: Nova.
  7. George M. Foster, Barbara Gallatin Anderson, Penterjemah: Priyanti Pakan Suryadarma, Meutia F. Hatta Swasono, 2006, Antropologi Kesehatan, Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
  8. Gustav Radbruch, 1996, Einfuhrung in die Rechtswissensschaft, Stuttgart: K.F. Koehler, 1961 dalam Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
  9. Jusuf Hanafiah dan Amri Amir, 2007, Etika Kedokteran dan Hukum Kesehatan, Edisi 4, Jakarta: Penerbit Bukum Kedokteran EGC.
  10. Syamsudin, 2013, Ilmu Hukum Profetik, Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.
  11. Robert C. Solomon, 1984, Etika, Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: Erlangga.
  12. Theo Hujibers, 1995, Filsafat Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
  13. Webster?s New Dictionary of Synonyms. Springfield, MA : Merriam-Webster, 1984.

[Edi Sumarwanto. (2017); RECONSTRUCTION OF SANCTIONS ON MEDICAL PROFESSION THAT HARM PATIENTS BASED ON JUSTICE VALUE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Jul). 156-164] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Edi Sumarwanto
Student of the Doctoral Law Program, Sultan Agung Islamic University Semarang, Jalan Raya Kaligawe Km 4 Semarang Indonesia 50112

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4705      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4705