20Jul 2017

DETERMINANTS OF QUALITY RESEARCH AND EXTENSION PROGRAMS OF THE COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION AT LAGUNA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY: AN ASSESSMENT.

  • Dean, College of Industrial Technology, Laguna State Polytechnic University, San Pablo City Campus, Brgy. Del Remedio, San Pablo City, Laguna, Philippines 4000.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This study assessed the quality and impact of research and extension (RDE) programs of the College of Teacher Education (CTE) at Laguna State Polytechnic University (LSPU) on the development of the clientele and communities. Specifically, it sought answers the profile of respondent; extent of compliance for quality research and extension programs; the differences on respondents? perceptions; and which variables taken singly or in combination significantly influence the quality of research and extension programs. Descriptive design was utilized with deans, directors, faculty, and staffs directly involved in RDE programs as respondents. Structured questionnaire adopted from AACCUP accreditation survey instruments with modifications was used. Mean, standard deviation, ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis were the statistical tools used. Majority of the respondents were 51 to 60 years of age, female; married; MA and Ed.D./Ph.D. holders. Their competence and commitment were rated very high; excellent work attitude, funding and resources components; while implementation, monitoring, evaluation, utilization of research results/outputs; publication and dissemination; priorities and relevance; planning; fund sourcing, community involvement and participation were rated high. Respondents perceived differently the quality of RDE programs and they concluded that respondents? profile and institution-related variables significantly influenced it; hence RDE quality and impact are felt by the stakeholders.

  1. Abanto, Librada L. (2005). An Introduction to Extension Services: Programs and Community Involvement. LSPC, Sta. Cruz Campus, Extension Department.
  2. Annuevo, C.M. (1997) Learning Gender Justice: The Challenge for Adult Education in the 21st Manila: FNB Publishers, Inc,.
  3. Bloom, Benjamin S. (1977) Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw Hill Co.
  4. Bowling, Chester J and Brahm, Barbara A. (2001) Evaluating Evaluation ? What We?ve Learned. University of Illinois.
  5. Calmorin, Laurintina P and Calmorin, Melchor A. (2000). Methods of Research and Thesis Writing. Quezon City: Rex Printing Company, Inc.
  6. Camarao, Fedeserio C. (1994) Technology Education in the Philippines, Manila: National Bookstore.
  7. Colinares, N.S. (2002) Teacher Education Issues and the Teacher. Nothern Samar: Tres Ni?as Printing Press.
  8. Davis, Keith. 1997) Human Behavior at Work. Fifth Edition New York: McGrew-Hill Book Company.
  9. Deim, Keith. (2001) Using Research Methods to Evaluate Your Extension Program. Educational Design Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
  10. De Chavez, Ernesto M. (1998) On Research and Extension Services. Vol. VI, No. 1, Graduate Journal PBMIT.
  11. French, Elizabeth. (1995).The Relationship of Achievement to Problem Solving Effectiveness. Abnormal Social Psychology. New York: Houghton Miffin Co.
  12. Gibson, James L. et.al. (2006) Organizations Behavior, Structure, Processes. Twelfth Edition, New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin.
  13. Hobart, Wendy. (1997) Critical Factors for Successful Programs. Battle Creek Michigan, W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
  14. Jones, E.J.(1986) Investing in Rural Extension. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London New York.
  15. Jain, R.K., et.al. (1997) Management of Research and Development, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  16. Kelly, William. .(1956) Educational Psychology. Milwaukee: The Bruce Publishing Co.
  17. Manuel, Bienvinido B. (1989) New Thrust in Philippine Education. Volume II, Quipo, Manila: Current Events Digest, Inc.
  18. Manske, Fred A. Jr. (1987) Secrets of Effective Leadership.? USA: Leadership and Education Development.
  19. Medley, Donald M. et.al. (1994 )Management ? Based Evaluation of Teacher Performance. New York: Longman Press
  20. .Nolledo, Jose N. (1995) The Education Act of the Philippines Annotated. Revised Edition. National Bookstore, Manila.
  21. Rogers, Carl B. (1942) Client-Central Therapy: Its Practice Theory. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.
  22. Roling, N. (1988) Extension Science Information Systems in Agricultural Development. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University.
  23. Ruiz, Macario B. 1988) Evaluation and Measurement of Philippine School Elementary Principles and Techniques. Quezon City: PR Garcia Publishing Co.
  24. Tuckman, Bruce W. (1975). Measuring Educational Outcomes. New York: Harcourt Bruce Jovanovich.
  25. Van Den Ban, A.W. and H.S. Hawkins. Agricultural Extension. New York: Longman Scientific and Technical Co., Published in? US with John Wiley and Sons Inc.
  26. Villegas, Emelina S. ?Education for Development? IBON Partnership in Education for Development, Mesa, Manila, June, 1999.

[Edilberto Z. Andal. (2017); DETERMINANTS OF QUALITY RESEARCH AND EXTENSION PROGRAMS OF THE COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION AT LAGUNA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY: AN ASSESSMENT. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Jul). 880-894] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

EDILBERTO Z. ANDAL, Ed.D.
LAGUNA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4794      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4794

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 44 | No. of Views: 171