26Jul 2017

DIFFERENT COMPRESSION TECHNIQUES ON ULTRASOUND IMAGING.

  • Cochin University Of Science & Technology.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Medical Imaging is an important keystone of modern healthcare and will continue to play a role of ever increasing importance at all levels of the healthcare system due to advances in imaging technology (US,CT, MR and Molecular Imaging). Since the medical image data is increasing day by day, compression is needed to achieve efficient transmission and storage. Different compression techniques are compared and applied to diverse ultrasound images. Clinicians who are using ultrasound transducer or probe for diagnosis needs a better quality image for better observation so that they can analyze the disorder of structure and steer medication. From the results it is observed that Wavelet based compression offers better image appearance with Gamma and Log compression techniques.

  1. Khalid Sayood, ?Introduction to data compression? Third Edition PP 423-513. 2011.
  2. Rafael C. Gonzalez and Richard E. Woods. 2002. Digital image Processing.Pearson Education, Englewood Cliffs, 2002.
  3. Adam CHEE, ?Advances in Medical Imaging Informatics - Dealing with Big Data? AMBIS ,binary healthcare .com.
  4. ImranaTanvir, SabihaRiaz, AfshanHussain, RiffatMehboob,M. Usman Shams, and Haseeb Ahmad Khan ,Hospital-Based Study of Epithelial Malignancies of Endometrial Cancer Frequency in Lahore, Pakistan,and Common Diagnostic Pitfalls, Hindawi Publishing Corporation Pathology Research International Volume 2014.
  5. J. Weinberger, G. Seroussi, G. Sapzro, LOCO-I: a low complexity, context-based, lossless image compression algorithm, Int. Conf. Data Compress. (1996)140?149.
  6. L. Wu, N. Memon, Context-based, adaptive, lossless image coding, IEEE Trans.Commun. 45 (4) (1997) 437?444.
  7. Weinberger, G. Seroussi, G. Sapiro, The LOCO-I lossless image compres-sion algorithm: principles and standardization into JPEG-LS, IEEE Trans. ImageProcess. 9 (2000) 1309?1324.
  8. F. Wu, C.F. Lin, A high-performance and memory-efficient pipeline architec-ture for the 5/3 and 9/7 discrete wavelet transform of JPEG2000 codec, IEEETrans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 15 (12) (2005) 1615?1628.
  9. K. Wallace, The JPEG still picture compression standard, CACM 34 (1991)30?44.
  10. Skodras, C. Christopoulos, T. Ebrahimi, The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard, IEEE Signal Processing Mag (2001).
  11. Zhiyongzuo, Xia Lan,?An improved medical image compression technique with lossless region of interest? Science direct, Optik 1269(2015) 2825-2831.
  12. L. Thampi and V. Paul, ?An Endometrial Cancer Image Compression With Lossless ROI,? International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology, ISSN: 2321-9009. (2017).
  13. Mohana Shankar, P., ?A general statistical model for ultrasonic backscattering from tissues,? IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Fre- quency Control, , vol.47, no.3, pp.727,736, May 2000. doi: 10.1109/58.842062.

[Lidiya Thampi and Varghese Paul. (2017); DIFFERENT COMPRESSION TECHNIQUES ON ULTRASOUND IMAGING. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Jul). 1782-1786] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Lidiya Thampi
Cochin University of science & Technology

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4899      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4899

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 19 | No. of Views: 91