30Sep 2017

MAIN CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT FRACTION GENERATED BETWEEN BRACKETS AND LIGATURES: BRIEF COMMENTS.

  • University Center North Paulista (Unorp) - S?o Jos? do Rio Preto ? SP, Brazil.
  • Post graduate and continuing education (Unipos), Street Ipiranga, 3460, S?o Jos? do Rio Preto SP, Brazil 15020-040.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The demand for orthodontic treatment has grown exponentially. In large part, the demand has been for devices self-ligating, because some articles have reported a shorter time of treatment in relation to the conventional apparatus. By means of literature review, this work had the objective of studying and comparing the frictional forces that occur during the treatment, between conventional / Self-ligating brackets in contact with orthodontic wires. And forces generated when using conventional and unconventional bandages in conventional brackets.

  1. Baccetti T, Franchi L. Friction produced by types of elastomeric ligatures in treatment mechanics with the preadjusted appliance. Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):211-6.
  2. Baker KL, Nieberg LG, Weimer AD, Hanna M. A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and archwire. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1987;91(4):316-20.
  3. Baty DL, Volz JE, Von Fraunhofer JA. Force properties of colored elastomeric modules. Am J of Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Jul;106(1):40-6.
  4. Boester CH, Johnston LE. A clinical investigation of the concepts of differential and optimal force in canine retraction. Angle Orthod. 1974 Apr;44(2):113-9.
  5. Brauchli LM, Senn C, Wichelhaus A. Active and passive self- -ligation - a myth? Angle Orthod. 2011 Mar;81(2):312-8.
  6. Burrow SJ. Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review. Am J of Orthod and Dentofac Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):442-7.
  7. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Ricciardi A, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):395-402.
  8. Chen SS, Greenlee GM, Kim JE, Smith CL, Huang GJ. Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 June;137(6):726.e1-726.e18; discussion 726-7.
  9. Dholakia KK, Bhat SR. Clinical efficiency of nonconventional elastomeric ligatures in the canine retraction phase of preadjusted edgewise appliance therapy: an in-vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 June;141(6):715-22.
  10. Huang TH, Luk HS, Hsu YC, Kao CT. An in vitro comparison of the frictional forces between archwires and self-ligating brackets of passive and active types. Eur J Orthod. 2011 Jul 16. [Epub ahead of print].
  11. Jean Rafael Geremia, Pablo Santos de Oliveira, Rog?rio Hel?dio Lopes Motta. Comparison of friction among self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets with different ligadures. Orthod. Sci. Pract. 2015; 8(29):30-37.
  12. Tecco S, Di Loiro D, Nucera R, Di Bisceglie, Cordasco G, Festa F. Evaluation of the friction of self-ligating and conventional bracket sistems. Eur J Dent. 2011 July;5(3):310-7.

[Francielle de Almeida Souza, Idiberto Jos? Zotarelli Filho, Leandro Moreira Tempest and Carlos Alberto Costa Neves Buchala. (2017); MAIN CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT FRACTION GENERATED BETWEEN BRACKETS AND LIGATURES: BRIEF COMMENTS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Sep). 1475-1477] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Idiberto Jose Zotarelli Filho
Unipos

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5469      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5469

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 4 | No. of Views: 53