INDEPENDENCY AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE AD HOC JUDGES IN THE INDUSTRIAL RELATION COURT IN DECIDING INDUSTRIAL RELATION DISPUTES BASED ON THE VIRTUE OF THE DIGNIFIED JUSTICE.
Resy Desifa Nasution1
, Prof. Dr. Teguh Prasetyo SH. M. Si2;
and Dr. H. Amin Purnawan SH
, S.p.N. M. Hum3
- Doctoral Student at the Faculty of Law Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang Central Java-Indonesia;
- Faculty of Law Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga Central Java-Indonesia) and Recently has been Appointed by the President of the Republic of Indonesia as the Commissioner for the Republic of Indonesia?s Court of Ethichs for the General Election Organizers.
- Faculty of Law Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang Central Java-Indonesia.
- Abstract
- Keywords
- References
- Cite This Article as
- Corresponding Author
This research has aimed at analysing and finding how the principle of independent judiciary and impartiality of the the Ad Hoc judges for the Indonesian Industrial Court to decide industrial disputes based on the virtue of Dignified Justice, identifying weaknesses and to do a reconstruction inventing an ideal principle of independency and impartiality of the Ad Hoc judges in deciding disputes based on the Dignified Justice. It has found that: the differentiation between concepts of career judges and the Ad Hoc judges in the Law Numb. 2 of 2004 on the Industrial Court which has not been followed by a clear and a definite stipulation of obligations for those judges to uphold their independency and duty to judge cases impartially has affected significantly on the principles, primarily due to the fact that the Ad Hoc judges in the Industrial Court, and to be included in the term the Ad Hoc judges at the Supreme Court has been appointed by the Head of the Supreme Court after recommendation given by the labour union and the employers organization. It is also worsened by the fact of which the Article 67 of the Industrial Court Act stipulating the labour union and the employers organization may request the Supreme Court to honorable terminate the Ad Hoc judges from their office. This is a clear indication of a factor which interfere with the virtue of independency and impartiality of the Ad Hoc judges.
- Teguh Prasetyo dan Abdul Halim Barkatullah, 2011, Ilmu Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum Studi Pemikiran Ahli Hukum Sepanjang Zaman, Cetakan Keempat, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
- ---------------,2012, Filsafat, Teori, dan Ilmu Hukum Pemikiran Menuju Masyrakat yang Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat, CetakanKesatu, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
- Teguh Prasetyo dan Arie Punomosidi, 2014, Membangun Hukum Berdasarkan Pancasila, Nusamedia, Yogyakarta.
- TeguhPrasetyo, 2010, Hukum Pidana, EdisiRevisi, RajaGrafindoPersada, Jakarta.
- ---------------, 2013, Hukum dan Sistem Hukum Berdasarkan Pancasila, EdisiKesatu, Media Perkasa, Yogyakarta.
- ---------------, 2015, Keadilan Bermartabat, Perspektif Teori Hukum, CetakanPertama, Nusa Media, Bandung.
[Resy Desifa Nasution1, Prof. Dr. Teguh Prasetyo SH. M. Si2; and Dr. H. Amin Purnawan SH, S.p.N. M. Hum3 (2017); INDEPENDENCY AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE AD HOC JUDGES IN THE INDUSTRIAL RELATION COURT IN DECIDING INDUSTRIAL RELATION DISPUTES BASED ON THE VIRTUE OF THE DIGNIFIED JUSTICE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Sep). 844-849] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com
Faculty of Law Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga Central Java-Indonesia
