08Sep 2018

EVALUATION OF THEMATIC LEARNING PROGRAM IN GOVERNMENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SINGKAWANG.

  • Departement of Educational Technology, Postgraduate of State University of Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The purpose of this study is to provide input to decision makers related to evaluation of thematic learning program in GovernmentElementary School Singkawang. The evaluation model used is CIPP. The results of this study are as follows: (1) Context evaluation in thematic learning has been implemented by all elementary school teachers due to the implementation of the 2013 curriculum; (2) Input evaluation shows the quality of primary school teachers need to be improved in supporting thematic learning process; (3) Process evaluation, showing the teacher\\\\\\\'s teaching planning can be categorized well, but most teachers still lack the competence in delivering the material. Most of them are more likely to present the material in conventional form; and (4) Product evaluation indicates an increase in student motivation in completing school tasks, but for teachers there is still a need to improve their ability in thematic learning, especially how to relate themes. From these findings, some recommendations were made to stakeholders at schools to invite experts, find qualified supervisors to hold workshops for teachers on instructional media, applying learning methods and instructional techniques, especially in support of thematic learning in schools basic.


  1. Azzam, Tarek & Szanyi, Michael (2011). Designing Evaluation: A study examination of the evaluation evaluation of CA\\\\\\\'s designated and educational evaluators.School of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences 91711 United States.
  2. Creswell, (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (Second Edition), London: Sage Publication, Inc.
  3. Daniel L. Stufflebeam & Anthony J. Shinkfield, (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models & Applications, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  4. Davies, Mary Ann and Brown, Rajni Shankar, (2011). A Programmatic Approach to Teaming and Thematic Instruction, Journal of North Carolina Middle School Association, Vol. 26. Number 1.
  5. Dwi Pursitasari, Indarwani, et al ,. (2015). Promoting of Thematic-based Integrated Science Learning on the Junior High School, Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 6, No.20.
  6. Fitzapatrick, Jody L. et al., (2012). Program Evaluation, Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, Pearson: Boston.
  7. Harris, C.J. & Rooks, D.I. (2010). Managing Inquiry-based science: Challenges in enacting complex science instruction in elementary and middle schoolclassroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education.
  8. Jane, Leer (2016), After the Big Bang the effects of decentralization on educational outcome through a difference-in-difference analysis. International Journal of Educational Development in Indonesia.
  9. Jellyman, Philip. (2015). Models of Curriculum Integration in New Zealand Secondary Schools, Subbatical Report, Term 2.
  10. John, Yvonne J, (2015). A New Thematic, Integrated Curriculum for Primary Schools of Trinidad and Tobago; A Paradigm Shift.
  11. Kosasih, E. (2013). Learning and Learning Strategies; Implementation Curriculum 2013. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
  12. Kovac, Velibor B. & Langfeldt, Gjert, (2010). Educational Evaluation in the light of construal level theory: The case of cognitive tuning, Studies in Educational Evaluation, Volume: 36.
  13. Li, Na (2012). Approach to Learning; Literature Review, International Baccalaureta Organization.
  14. Majid, Abdul. (2014). Integrated Thematic Learning. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
  15. Medellu, Christophil S. et al., (2015). Democratization of Learning through Thematic Assignment, International Education Studies, Vol. 8. No.4.
  16. Min, Kon Chou, Rashid, Abdullah Mat and Nazri, Moh Ibrahim, (2012). Teachers\\\\\\\' Understanding and Practice towards Thematic Approach in Teaching Integrated Living Skills (ILS) in Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 2. No. 23.
  17. Mudiono, Alif, et al., (2016). Developing of Integrated Thematic Learning Model through Scientific Approaching with Discovery Learning Tehnique in Elementary School. International Academic Journal of Social Science, Vol. 3, No.10,
  18. Okoro, C.D, & Okoro, C.U. (2016). Teachers\\\\\\\' Understanding and Use of Thematic Approach in Teaching and Learning of Social Studies in Rivers State. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development. Vol.4, No. 3.
  19. Ratnawati, Heri, et al., (2017). Teachers\\\\\\\' Difficulties in Implementing Thematic Teaching and Learning in Elementary Schools. The New Educational Review.
  20. Reiser, Robert and Dempsey, John. (2012). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Boston: Pearson.
  21. Rusmono, (2012).Learning Strategy with Problem Based Learning Needed, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
  22. Topno, Harshit., (2016). Evaluation of Training and Development: An Analysis of Various Model. JOSR, Journal & Business and Management, ISSN: 2278-487X. Vol. 5 Issue 2.
  23. Woolfolk, Anita (2007). Educational Psychology. (Boston: Pearson Educational.
  24. Youker, Brandon W & Ingraham, Allyssa (2014). Goal-Free Evaluation: An Oriented for Foundation\\\\\\\'s Evaluations, The Foundaion Review. Volume 5, Issue 4.
  25. Zhang, Guili, et al., (2011). Using The Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-Learning Programs. University of Goerge: Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement.
 

[Ersan, Tuti Nuriah Erwin and Rusmono. (2018); EVALUATION OF THEMATIC LEARNING PROGRAM IN GOVERNMENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SINGKAWANG. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Sep). 12-20] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Ersan
Departement of Educational Technology, Postgraduate of State University of Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7639      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7639