INFLUENCE DRILL TEST TEAM COMPOSITION AND WORK ENVIRONMENT TOWARD JOB SATISFACTION ON INDONESIAN NAVY FIRST FLEET EXERCISE COMMAND

Darwin Sagala 1 , Sylviana Murni 2 and Suparno Eko 3 . 1. Management Education Universitas Negeri Jakarta. 2. Jl. Rawamangun Muka, RT.11/RW.14, Rawamangun, Kec. Pulo Gadung, Kota. 3. Jakarta Timur, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 13220. ...................................................................................................................... Manuscript Info Abstract ......................... ........................................................................ Manuscript History Received: 14 July 2019 Final Accepted: 16 August 2019 Published: September 2019

The objective research is to obtain information concerning influence drill test team composition and work environment toward job satisfaction on Indonesian Navy first fleet exercise command. The research was conducted by using survey method with path analysis in testing hypothesis.In this research 100 from 130 personel Indonesian Navy first fleet exercise command with selected random sampling.The research was focused on three aspect: composition team and work environment toward job satisfaction. The data were collected by using questionare and analyzed with path analysis to know that (1) there is the direct positive influence of team composition toward job satisfaction (2) there is the direct positive influence of work environment toward job satisfaction. 1185 2. carry out the duties of the TNI in the development and development of the power of the sea 3. carry out empowerment of sea defense areas. 4. Initially, the Indonesian Navy only had two (2) Fleets, but currently since 2018, the Navy has three ( If faced with the diversity of types of Navy warships that must be tested, then the composition or configuration of the team both about competence and task experience from team members should be adjusted to the task of testing to be carried out so that the effectiveness of team work is achieved. Other factors that also affect effectiveness work between: Work environment from team members as part of L-1 or L-2 teams.

Formulation of the problem
Based on the background of the problem and the identification of the problem and the limitation of the problem, the researcher formulated this research problem as follows: 1. Does the composition of the team influence job satisfaction ? 2. 2. Does work environment influence job satisfaction?

Research methods:-
In accordance with the problems in the research as well as the stated objectives, the research method used is conducting a survey with a quantitative approach, selecting a survey method because this study explains the causal relationship and hypothesis testing, while the quantitative approach is intended as an effort to interpret and measure research data. in the form of numbers.
The research data was collected through a survey conducted on Kolat Koarmada I. personnel. The data obtained were analyzed using path analysis techniques to explain the influence between research variables, namely: 1. influence of team composition (X 1 ) on job satisfaction (Y) 2. influence of work environment (X 2 ) on job satisfaction (Y) 1186 These variables can be described by the path diagram as follows see figure 1.

Figure 1:-Diagram Influence between Research Variables
Information: X 1 = team composition X 2 = work environment Y = job satisfaction Definition, work environment and job satisfaction,different authors have different approaches to definition. some of the most commonly cited definition are analysed in the text that follows.
Composition team Is an effective team, an effective team .a team is a group of two or more people who interdependently seek to meet a common purpose, often through problem solving,in order to meet their own and their organization's goals. At a minimum, a team should be a cooperative units and,at its best, a team is a collaborative unit." (Catarina Linos, 2017;3) Team members must work together effectively to produce successful systems (John. H. Bradley and Frederic. J. Herbert).Much of this research focuses on how individual characteristics of team or group members are related to performance. However, team composition is more complex than staffing individual positions because the members must collaborate well if the team is to be effective" (Klimoski and Jones, 1995).  distribution table as  follows see table 1. The structural equation formed in the first substructure model consists of 2 path coefficients from variables X 1 to Y, and X 2 to Y in the form: Y = p y1 X 1 + p y2 X 2 + p y ε 1 . With a magnitude (R y . 12 ) 2 = 0. 1908 so p y ε 1 = 0.900. So the form of structural equations in the first sub-structure model: Ŷ = 0,279X 1 + 0,271X 2 + 0,900. The description of the path coefficient estimation is explained in table 1. and visualized through the following image display see table 2.

Dependent Variable: Job satisfaction (Y)
The results of the first structural model estimation are then shown in the following figure 2:

Positive Direct Influences of Work environment toward Job satisfaction
The hypothesis tested is: H 0 : β y2 ≤ 0 H 1 : β y2 > 0 Work environment path coefficient value for job satisfaction is 0.271 with a t count of 2.836. Therefore the value of t count is greater than the value of t table at dk = 95 for α = 0.05 at 1.99. then H 0 is rejected and H 1 is accepted. which means that there is a positive direct Influences of the variable work environment on the job satisfaction variable which is stated to be very significant.
From the results of the analysis and calculation process carried out in appendix 7 on the direct influence section. it can be summarized as follows table 3: The results obtained after conducting a model analysis are used as a basis in answering hypotheses and drawing conclusions in this study. Explanation of the answers to these hypotheses can be described as follows:

Positive Direct Influences of Team Composition (X 1 ) on Job satisfaction (Y)
The results of the analysis of the first hypothesis produced findings that the composition of the team had a direct positive Influences on job satisfaction. Based on these findings it can be concluded that job satisfaction is directly influenced positively by team composition. The meaning is increasing the composition of the team will result in increased job satisfaction.

Positive Direct Influences of Work environment (X 2 ) on Job satisfaction (Y)
The results of the third hypothesis analysis produce findings that work environment has a positive direct Influences toward job satisfaction. Based on these findings it can be concluded that job satisfaction is directly influenced positively by work environment. The meaning is increased work environment will result in increased job satisfaction.