15Apr 2020

ATTITUDE OF THE PEOPLE REGARDING WILDLIFE CONSERVATION, CAUSES OF HUMAN-WILDLIFE CONFLICT AND ITS MITIGATION MEASURES IN KASHMIR VALLEY

  • Glocal School of Agricultural Sciences Glocal University, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India-247001.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The present study was initiated to assess the attitude of local people living near the forests in ten (10) districts of Kashmir valley during the year 2016 -2018. The main aim was to assess the perception of people regarding wildlife conservation and general knowledge of local populace in this regard. It was also to know about Human-Wildlife conflict and the mitigation measures from the local point of view. About one thousand (1000) people belonging to the age group 18 to 76 years were questioned with hundred (100) from each district making sure each village of the districts belonging to all the five (5) wildlife divisions of Kashmir valley gets covered. population trend, 71% of the people were of the opinion that the population of the wild animal is increasing while the 19% of the people responded negative and 10% of population were not sure and gave no answer.An interesting find during the study was that Leopards and Wolves kill and consume the livestock, but the Black Bears go on silly rampage killing maximum and consuming minimum. About 47 % of the people from all the 10 districts held an opinion that sheep/goat were the cattle depredated most followed by cattle (cow, ox, buffalo etc.) about 31 % by Leopards and Black Bears and horsed around 14% by Leopards. Only 8% of the people reported others which included poultry, ducks and pets by Porcupines, Jackals and Foxes.Around 23% of the people guarding their fields using Dokas (Machans) said that this was by far the most effective method in keeping wild-animals away, 19% of the people are using watch dogs, 14% of the people are using the scare crows, 10% of the people were using wind chimes, around 11% that of the people were using methods of lighting fire as it is believed that fire has proved to be one of the best deterrent for wild animals.


  1. Andersone Z. & Ozolins, J. (2004) Public perception of large carnivores in Latvia. Ursus, 15, 181-197.
  2. Athreya V., Odden M., Linnell J. D. C. and Karanth K. U. (2011). Translocation as a tool for mitigating conflict with leopards in human-dominated landscapes of India. Conservation Biology, 25(1):133-141.
  3. Charoo S. A., Sharma L. K. & Sathyakumar S. (2011). Asiatic black bear?human interactions around Dachigam National Park, Kashmir, India. Ursus 22(2):106?113.
  4. Chauhan A. and Pirta R. S. (2010b). Public opinion regarding human-monkey conflict in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. Human Ecology, 30(2): 105?109.
  5. Conover M. R. (2001). Resolving human-wildlife conflicts: the science of wildlife damage management. CRC press.
  6. Dar M. A. (2007). Ecology of Leopard and Himalayan Black Bear in and around Dachigam National Park, with special reference to Human-Wildlife Conflict. Sc. Wildlife Science Dissertation. Dept. of Wildlife Science, Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Aligarh U.P.
  7. Dar M. A.,Sathyakumar S.& Koul R. (2012). Himachal Pradesh Bear Conservation and Welfare Action plan. Wildlife Trust of India.
  8. Dar M. A & Mir R. A. (2019). Causalities of Human Wildlife Conflict in Kashmir valley, with special reference to Leopard and Asiatic Black Bear. IJRAR, 6 (1): 701-706.
  9. Dickman AJ (2010) Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human-wildlife conflicts. Animal Conservation 13: 458?466.
  10. Ermala A. (2003) A survey of large predators in Finland during the 19th-20th ActaZoologicaLituanica 13: 15?20.
  11. Graham K, Beckerman A. P. Thirgood S. Human-predator-prey conflicts: ecological correlates, prey losses and patterns of management. Biological Conservation. 2005 122: 159-171.
  12. Kaczensky, P., Blazic, M. & Gossow, H. (2004) Public attitudes towards brown bears (Ursusarctos) in Slovenia. Biological Conservation, 118, 661-674.
  13. Lamarque F, Anderson J, Fergusson R, Lagrange M, OseiOwusu Y, Bakker L (2009). Human-wildlife conflict in Africa: cause, consequences and management strategies. Biol. 17:1512-1520.
  14. Madden F. Preventing and mitigating human?wildlife conflicts: World Parks Congress recommendation. Human Dimension Wildl. 2004 9:259-60.
  15. Newmark WD, Manyanza DN, Gamassa Deo-gratias M (1994). The conflict wildlife and local people living adjacent to protected areas in Tanzania: human density as a predictor: Conserv. Biol., 8: 249-255.
  16. Newmark WD, Manyanza DN, Gamassa Deo-gratias M (1994). The conflict wildlife and local people living adjacent to protected areas in Tanzania: human density as a predictor: Conserv. Biol., 8: 249-255.
  17. Nji A (2004). Why poor people remain poor. Key elements for poverty reduction and sustainable development. Yaound?, Cameroon Buma Kor Publishers. Pp. 240.
  18. Osmond P (1994). Wildlife-Human conflicts in Kenya: Integrating wildlife conservation with human needs in Masai Mara region PhD Thesis, McGill University, Montreal.
  19. R?skaft, E., Bjerke, T., Kaltenborn, B.P. &Linnell, J.D.C. (2003) Patterns of self-reported fear towards large carnivores among the Norwegian public. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 24, 184-198.

[Masood Ahmad Dar and Rayees Afzal Mir (2020); ATTITUDE OF THE PEOPLE REGARDING WILDLIFE CONSERVATION, CAUSES OF HUMAN-WILDLIFE CONFLICT AND ITS MITIGATION MEASURES IN KASHMIR VALLEY Int. J. of Adv. Res. 8 (Apr). 48-56] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Masood Ahmad Dar
Glocal University,Saharanpur

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10743      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10743