30Mar 2017

EVALUATION OF THE EMERGENCE AGITATION INCIDENCE IN CHILDREN WHO UNDERWENT DEEP SEDATION FOR TOOTH EXTRACTION.

  • MD, Assistant Professor, Department ofOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University(Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Specialist), Ankara, TURKEY.
  • MD, Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TURKEY.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Purpose: Emergence agitation (EA) is a condition where factors associated with patient, surgery and anesthesia play role in occurrence, and that may occur in any age groups–particularly well-defined in children and delay discharge. Emergence agitation has been investigated for medical interventions under general anesthesia in children, but not for dental treatment under deep sedation. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of EA in pediatric cases scheduled for tooth extraction under deep sedation and its relationship with drugs for sedation. Materials and Methods: 120 cases, less than 12 years old and in ASA I-II group according to “American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA)” risk classification were scheduled for elective tooth extraction under deep sedation without premedication. The patients were admitted in operating room just according to our anesthesia protocol. With the aim of achieving Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS)=(-4), In Group K who allowed IV (Intravenous) canulla insertion: 2-3 mg.kg-1 IV Ketamine was administrated. In Group KM who also allowed IV cannula insertion: 0.5 mg of Midazolam was added to 2-3 mg.kg-1 IV Ketamine. In Group S: 8% Sevofluranein 50% O2/N2O through face mask (connected to a Mapleson C circuit) was administrated to the Group S who did not allow inserting IV canulla. Detecting the RASS as -4 local infiltration anaesthesia was applied for the extraction of associated teeth. Following the procedure recovery was evaluated at T0, than 15 min. later (T15), 30 min. later (T30), 45 min later (T45), 60 min later (T60) with RASS. Results: The RASS values at T0 were statistically significantly higher in Group K than those of other groups. No significant differences were found between groups for RASS mean at T15 RASS values at T30, T45, T60 minutes were statistically significantly lower in Group S than Group K and Group KM. Conclusions: We concluded that use of ketamine alone or in combination with low dose of midazolam for short-time surgical procedures did not cause agitation compared to sevoflurane, increased quick recovery and child-parent satisfaction and efficiency of operating room.


  1. Hallonsten A, Veerkamp J, Rölling I. Pain, Pain control and sedation in children and adolescent: Koch G, Poulsen S. Pediatric Dentistry: A Clinical Approach Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Co,Uk, 2003;147-71.
  2. Troutman KC: In Pediatric Dentistry: Total Patient Care. SHY Wei ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger. 1988;396-7.
  3. Ogg TW: Use of anaesthesia. Implications of day-case surgery and anaesthesia. Br Med J 1980;19: 281(6234):212-4.
  4. Cravero J. Surgenor S, Whalen K. Emergence agitation in paediatric patients after sevofluraneanaesthesia and no surgery: a comparison with halothane. PaediatrAnaesth. 2000;10(4):419-24.
  5. Guo JJin XWang HYu JZhou XCheng YTao QLiu LZhang J. Emergence and Recovery Characteristics of Five Common Anesthetics in Pediatric Anesthesia: a Network Meta-analysis.2016  doi:10.1007/s12035-016-9982-3.
  6. Kuratani N, Oi Y. Greater incidence of emergence agitation in children after sevoflurane anesthesia as compared with halothane: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 2008; 109(2): 225-32.
  7. Hadi SM, Saleh AJ, Tang YZ, Daoud A, Mei X, Ouyang W. The effect of KETODEX on the incidence and severity of emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy using sevoflurane based-anesthesia. Int J PediatrOtorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(5):671-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.02.012.
  8. Reves JG, Glass PSA, Lubarsky DA, McEvoy MD: Intravenous nonopioid anesthetics: Anaesthesia. Sixth edition. Miller RD (ed) Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia 2005, P. 317-379.
  9. Moore ADAnghelescu DL.Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Anesthesia.Pediatric Drugs.2016 Oct 31.  doi: 10.1007/s40272-016-0201-5.
  10. Eckenhoff, JE., Kneale DH,  Dripps RD. The incidence and etiology of postanesthetic excitement: a clinical survey. Anesthesiology. 1961;22:667-73.
  11. Smessaert A, Schehr CA, Artusio JF. Jr. Observations in the immediate postanaesthesia period. II. Mode of recovery. Br. J. Anaesth. 1960; 32: 181-5.
  12. Veyckemans F. Excitation phenomena during sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Curr Op Anesthesiol 2001; 14:339-43.
  13. Voepel-Lewis T, Malyvia S, Tait AR. A prospective cohort study of emergence agitation in the pediatric postanesthesia care unit. AnesthAnalg 2003; 96:1625-1630.
  14. Wermelt JZ, Ellerkmann RK. Emergence delirium in children - prophylaxis and treatment. 2016;51(7-08):448-57
  15. Kerson AG, DeMaria R, Mauer E, Joyce C, Gerber LM, Greenwald BM, Silver G, Traube C. Validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) in critically ill children. J Intensive Care. 2016 Oct 26;4:65. doi:  1186/s40560-016-0189-5
  16. Robinson BR, Berube M, Barr J, Riker R, Gelinas C. Psychometric analysis of subjective sedation scales in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med 2013;41:16-29.
  17. Sessler CN, Gosnell M, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O’Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J RespirCrit Care Med 2002;166 (10):1338-44.
  18. ASA: Continium of depth of sedation definition of general anesthesia and levels of sedation/analgesia (Approved by ASA House of Delegates on October 13, 1999, and amendedon October 27, 2004). http://www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/standards/20.pdf
  19. Cole, JW, Murray DC, McAllister JD. Emergence behaviour in children: defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anaesthesia. PaediatrAnaesth. 2002; 12: 442-7.
  20. Aono J, Ueda W, Mamiya K, Takimoto E, Manabe M. Greater incidence of delirium during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in preschool boys. Anesthesiology. 1997; 87(6): 1298-300.
  21. Vlajkovic GP, Sindjelic RP. Emergence delirium in children: many questions, few answers. 2007; 104(1):84-91.
  22. Kain ZN, Wang SM, Mayes LC, Caramico LA, Hofstadter MB. Distress during the induction of anesthesia and postoperative behavioral outcomes. AnesthAnalg. 1999;88(5):1042–7.
  23. Ahrazo?lu MS, Türktan M, Özbek H, Güne? Y.Effects of Sevoflurane and Desflurane Anesthesia on Recovery and Agitation in Children Undergoing Strabismus Surgery. Çukurova Med J 2012; 37(4): 186-192.
  24. I??k B, Arslan M, Tunga AD, Kurtipek O. Dexmedetomidine decreases emergence agitation in pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia without surgery. PaediatrAnaesth. 2006; 16(7):748-53.
  25. Cravero J, Surgenor S, Whalen K. Emergence Agitation in paediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia and no surgery: a comparison with halothane. PaediatrAnaesth2000;10:419-24.
  26. Cohen IT, Finkel JC, Hannallah RS, Hummer KA, Patel KM.Rapid emergence does not explain agitation following sevofluraneanaesthesia in infants and children: a comparison with propofol. 2003;13(1):63-7.
  27. Picard V, Dumont L, Pellegrini M. Quality of recovery in children: sevoflurane versus propofol.ActaAnaesthesiol Scand. 2000; 44(3): 307-10.
  28. Lapin SL, Auden SM, Goldsmith LJ, Reynolds AM. Effects of sevofluraneanaesthesia on recovery in children: a comparison with halothane. PaediatrAnaesth. 1999;9(4):299-304.
  29. Shrestha S, Shrestha BR. Oral administration of intravenous solution of midazolam mixed in syrup of paracetamol is an effective way of premedicating children undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. Katmandu Univ Med J. 2007; 5(4): 449-55.
  30. Ko YP, Huang CJ, Hung YC, Su NY, Tsai PS, Chen CC, Cheng CR. Premedication with low-dose oral midazolam reduces incidence and severity of emergency agitation in pediatric patients following sevofluraneanaesthesia. ActaAnaesthesiol Sin. 2001; 39: 169–177.
  31. McGraw T, Kendrick A. Oral midazolam premedication and postoperative behaviour in children. PaediatrAnaesth 1998; 8: 117–121.
  32. Abu-Shahwan I, Chowdary K. Ketamine is effective in decreasing the incidence of emergence agitation in children undergoing dental repair under sevoflurane general anesthesia. 2007; 17(9):846-50.
  33. Chen JYJia JELiu TJQin MJLi WX. Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and placebo on emergence agitation after strabismus surgery in children. Can J Anaesth.2013; 60(4): 385-92.

[Ay?e Hande ARPACI and Berrin ISIK. (2017); EVALUATION OF THE EMERGENCE AGITATION INCIDENCE IN CHILDREN WHO UNDERWENT DEEP SEDATION FOR TOOTH EXTRACTION. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Mar). 1614-1622] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Dr.Ay?e Hande ARPACI
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University (Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Specialist), Ankara, TURKEY

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3670      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3670