01Aug 2019

CADCAM V/S CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE FOR BETTER MARGINAL FIT OF METAL COPINGS FROM WAX PATTERNS.

  • Private practitioner, Andhra pradesh, India.
  • Associate Fellow AAID, USA; Private practitioner, Dr. Sekhars Dental Care and Implant Centre, Telangana, India.
  • Private practitioner, Dr. Sekhars Dental Care and Implant Centre, Telangana, India.
  • Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Sri Sai Dental College and Research Institute, Srikakulam, Telangana, India.
  • Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Sri Sai Dental College and Research Institute, Srikakulam, Telangana, India.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Aim: To evaluate and compare the marginal gap of metal copings cast from wax patterns fabricated with conventional technique and CAD/CAM technique. Materials and Method: Fifty samples were fabricated using Standardized MIS implant abutment as a die. 25 wax patterns (n=25) were fabricated by conventional wax coping method and rest (n=25) were fabricated by CAD/CAM wax milling technique. The wax copings of both the methods are casted with conventional casting technique. The marginal gap of copings was evaluated by direct view technique under stereomicroscope (MAGNUS) with digital camera. Then images were transferred to personal computer for measuring marginal gap at 15 random points by using image analyzer (IMAGE PRO EXPRESS 6.0). Statistical data was calculated and further analyzed by unpaired student t-test (α=0.05). Results: This study showed an overall mean of 595.26 ?m for absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) with Standard deviation of 264.94 for CAD/CAM group and 233.42 um with Standard deviation of 184.98 for conventional group (control). Unpaired T-Test revealed that marginal gap was significantly higher in CAD CAM group than the conventional wax-up group. Conclusions: Within limitations of this study conventional method of wax pattern fabrication produced copings with significantly better marginal fit than CAD/CAM technique. All the factors for 2 groups were standardized except wax pattern fabrication technique therefore only the conventional group results in copings with clinically acceptable margins of less than 300 microns. Advancement in digital dentistry has improved the ease and quality of restoration in dental lab but still needs a technical improvement in scanning procedure, data processing and milling technology. Clinical Significance: The long-term success rate of metal ceramic crown is determined by the proper marginal fit between the restoration and the prepared tooth. The improper fit or marginal discrepancy leads to secondary caries which accounts for 85% failures in fixed partial dentures. Even though digital technology has radically emerged into the dental laboratory procedures to improve the quality of restorations, this study reveals conventional wax up and casting procedure showed better marginal fit as compared to CAD-CAM system.


  1. Vojdani M, Torabi K, Farjood E, Khaledi AA. Comparison the marginal and internal fit of metal copings cast from wax patterns fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional wax up techniques. Journal of Dentistry. 2013 Sep;14(3):118.
  2. Carneiro T. Digital Technology in Implant Dentistry. J Dent & Oral Disord. 2015; 1(1): 1002.
  3. Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37:866-876.
  4. Narula S, Punia V, KhaNdelWal M, Sharma V, Pamecha S. Retention in conventional fixed partial dentures: A Review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011 Oct;5(5):1128-33.
  5. Hunter AJ, Hunter AR. Gingival margins for crowns: a review and discussion. Part II: Discrepancies and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 636-642.
  6. Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, Mackay J, Hatamleh MM. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2013 Jul;22(5):419-28.McLean JW, Von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-111.
  7. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit .J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-408.
  8. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, and Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain fused to metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31.
  9. HS, Yang.HS, Lim HP, Park.YJ. Marginal accuracy and internal fit of machine milled and cast titanium crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:191-197.
  10. Stephane V, Francis G.M, Brigitte G: Combination fixed and removable prostheses using a CoCr alloy: A clinical report: J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96:100-3.
  11. Tan PL, Gratton DG, Diaz-Arnold AM, Holmes DC. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations.J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 378-383.
  12. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: An overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-511.
  13. Kokubo Y, Nagayama Y, Tsumita M, Ohkubo C, Fukushim S, Vult von Steyern P. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 753-758.
 

[Phani Chnadrika, Chandrasekhar N, Soujanya K, Ravalika KN, Siddesh Kumar and Jagadeesh Konchada. (2019); CADCAM V/S CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE FOR BETTER MARGINAL FIT OF METAL COPINGS FROM WAX PATTERNS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (8). 160-166] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Dr. Nakka Chandrasekhar
Dr. Sekhar\\\'s Dental care and Implant Centre

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9489       DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9489


Share this article