15Oct 2019

GROWTH OF INFORMAL EDUCATION SECTOR IN BANGLADESH: A CASE STUDY ON BARISHAL CITY CORPORATION AREA.

  • Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Barishal, Bangladesh.
  • Lecturer, Department of Sociology, University of Barishal, Bangladesh.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The study aimed to identify the factors which are associated with the growth of the informal education sector in Bangladesh. The Barishal city, a southern rising city of Bangladesh was selected as a study area. An explorative research design was chosen for the study. A total of 100 respondents (students) participated in the study and two FGDs (Parents & Teacher) taken for both quantitative and qualitative data collection. Empirical data refers to that in the study area informal educational institutions are rising and functioning as a shadow education system. Most of the students are dependent on informal education institutions because they believe that formal institutions are not capable to provide satisfactory services. The major factors which are responsible for fall of the formal education sector are lack of attention of the authority, big student size in the classroom, a small number of teachers at the formal institution, unjustified syllabus, teachers’ intention to not provide quality education in the classroom due to low salary, etc. Moreover, psychologically students and parents are dependent on the informal education system to get desirable success in the public examination where the teachers are interested to earn extra money by providing extra time and care in the informal educational system.


  1. Bray, M. (2006). Private supplementary tutoring: Comparative perspectives on patterns and implications.?Compare,?36(4), 515-530.
  2. Bray, M., & Kwok, P. (2003). Demand for private supplementary tutoring: conceptual considerations, and socio-economic patterns in Hong Kong.?Economics of Education Review,?22(6), 611-620.
  3. Bray, T. M. (1999).?The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning..
  4. Davies, S., &Aurini, J. (2003). Homeschooling and Canadian educational politics: Rights, pluralism and pedagogical individualism.?Evaluation & Research in Education,?17(2-3), 63-73.
  5. Heung-ju, K. (2006). Korea?s Obsession with Private Tutoring. Asian Network of Training and Research Institutions in Educational Planning (ANTRIEP) Newsletter, 11(1), pp. 11-17
  6. Jeffs, T. (2001). Historical perspectives on informal.?Principles and practice of informal education: Learning through life, 34.
  7. Kim, E., Nam, D. I., &Stimpert, J. L. (2004). Testing the applicability of Porter's generic strategies in the digital age: A study of Korean cyber malls.?Journal of Business Strategies,?21(1).
  8. Kwok, P. (2001). Local knowledge and value transformation in East Asian mass tutorial schools.?International Education Journal,?2(5), 86-97.
  9. Nath, S. R. (2008). Private supplementary tutoring among primary students in Bangladesh.?Educational Studies,?34(1), 55-72.
  10. Reaz Ahmed, S., Deb Nath, S. K., &Wahhaj Uddin, M. (2005). Optimum shapes of tire‐treads for avoiding lateral slippage between tires and roads.?International Journal for numerical methods in Engineering,?64(6), 729-750.
  11. Tansel, A., &BircanBodur, F. (2004). Private tutoring expenditures in Turkey.

[Ohidur Zaman, Tareq Mahamud Abir and Farjana Afroz. (2019); GROWTH OF INFORMAL EDUCATION SECTOR IN BANGLADESH: A CASE STUDY ON BARISHAL CITY CORPORATION AREA. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Oct). 471-475] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Md. Ohidur Zaman
Assistant Professor

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9853      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9853