18Feb 2017

REVIEWING ON STREET ATTRIBUTES IN INFLUENCING SENSE OF PLACE AND PLACE ATTACHMENT.

  • Assistant Lecturer, Department of Architectural Engineering. Cihan University- Sulaimaniya.
  • Assistant Lecturer, Department of Architectural Engineering. Mosul University.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Nowadays, the concept of sense of place and place attachment are threatened by new developments, urban interventions, poor design and erosion in streets of towns and cities. These threatens lead to the loss of the character of city centers. There is no doubt that the sense of place and place attachment can be created by street attributes. Thus, this paper attempts to review the attributes of city center streets that contribute in influencing sense of place and place attachment. The study postulates this question: what are the street attributes that have influences on the sense of place and place attachment? The study aims at establishing the theoretical framework of street attributes in terms of creating sense of place and place attachment. The study reveals that streets have two types of characteristics, physical and functional. These characteristics can create and enhance street attributes that include vitality, diversity, transaction, accessiblity, legibility, distinctiveness, comfort, and safety and security in terms of making place attachment, besides commerce, cultural value, social value, movement, accessibility, legibility, recognition, sense of comfort, and sense of safety in terms of making sense of place.


  1. Alford, S. R. (2011). An Exploration of the Attributes of Sense of Place in A Culturally-Diverse Dallas District: Learning From Cedar Springs. Unpublished Master's Thesis. The University of Texas at Arlington.
  2. Al-Obeidy, M. S. and Shamsuddin, S. (2017). The Role of Commercial Streets as a Channel of Movement in Relating to the Sense of Place. International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR). 5(1), 1598-1607
  3. Bassett, M. A. (2011). The Role Of Historic Resources in Fostering Sense of Place: A Study of Sense of Place in Uptown and Tierrasanta, San Diego. Thesis .
  4. Beidler K. J. (2007). Sense of Place and New Urbanism: Towards a Holistic Understanding of Place and Form. Unpublished PhD Thesis. the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  5. Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S., and Smith, G. (1985). Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers. Architectural Press: London, p. 363- 365
  6. Commission of Architecture and the Built Environment (2000). By Design: Urban Design in the Planning System: Towards Better Practice. London: Thomas Telford Publishing.
  7. Hidalgo, C. and Hernandez, B. (2001). Place Attachment: Conceptual and Empirical Questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology. (2001) 21,  273-281.
  8. Ja'afar, N. H., and Sulaiman, A. B. and Shamsuddin, S. (2012). Traditional Street Activities in Kuala Lumpur City centre. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Thoughts. Volume 2 (1) , P. 93-105.
  9. Ja’afar, N.H., Usman, M.S., Tahir, M.M., and Nor, M.F. I. M. (2008). Activity Element Of Traditional Street In Attracting Visitor.  Journal of Design+ Built. volume(1), p. 15-20.
  10. Ja'afar, N. H. and Usman, I. M. S. (2009). Physical and Transportation Elements of Traditional Street in Malaysia. Volume 9, Number 4, p.669- 676.
  11. Ja'afar, N. H. (2006). Criteria "Success" in the Traditional Way to Attract Visitors: Kuala Lumpur: A Case Study. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudi.
  12. Jacobs A.B. (1993). “The Great Streets”. United States of America: The MIT Press.
  13. Jorgenson, B.R. and Steadman, R.C. (2005). A Comparative Analysis of Predictors of Sense of Place Dimensions: Attachment to, Dependence on, and Identification with lakestore Properties. Journal of Environmental Management, 1-12.
  14. Lewicka, M. (2008). Place attachment, Place Identity, and Place Memory: Restoring the Forgotten City Past. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 28 (2008), 209–231.
  15. Lin, C. C. (2011). Sense of Place, Protected Areas and Tourism: Two Tasmanian Case Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Tasmanian.
  16. Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of a City. Cambridge Massachusetts.
  17. Morgan, P. (2010). Towards a Developmental Theory of Place Attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30 (2010) 11–22.
  18. Mehta, V. (2007). Lively Streets: Determining Environment Characteristics to Support Social Behaviour. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 27, 165-187.
  19. Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a City: Urbanity, Vitality and Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93-116.
  20. Moughtin, C. (2003). Urban Design: Streets and Square. (3th ed.) London: Elsevier’s Science and Technology Rights Department in Oxford.
  21. Najafi, M. and Shariff, M. K. M. (2011). The Concept of Place and Sense of Place in Architectural Studies. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences. 6:3. p. 187- 193
  22. PPS (2013, July 13 and 14). Streets as Places. Retrieved on May 1, 2013, from http://www.pps.org
  23. Raymond, C. M., Brown, G., and Weber, D. (2010). The Measurement of Place Attachment: Personal, Community, and Environmental Connections. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30 (2010), 422-434.
  24. Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion. Volume (1), number (1), p. 54- 57
  25. Scannell, L. and Gifford, R. (2010). Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30 (2010), 1–10.
  26. Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of Place: an Empirical Measurement. Geoforum, 22(3): 347-358
  27. Smaldone, D. (2006). The Role of Time in Place Attachment. Proceedings of the 2006 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium: GTR-NRS-P-14, 47-56
  28. Shinbira, I. A. (2012). Conservation of the Urban Heritage to Conserve the Sense of Place, a Case Study Misurata City, Libya. 2nd International Conference-Workshop on Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design 2012. 3-5 March, 2012, School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
  29. Shinbira, I. A., and Sulaiman, A. B. (2010). Physical Qualities and Activities Patterns Associated with Street's Identity, A Case Study Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. pp.390-399.
  30. Sulaiman, B., Shamsuddin, S., and Ja'afar, N. H. (2008). The Traditional Shopping Streets and its Attractions to the Users. Sulaiman, A. B. and Mai, M. M. (Eds.). Urban Design Issues in the Developing World, The Case Study in Malaysia and Nigeria. Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. p.42-64.
  31. Ujang, N. (2008). Place Attachment Towards Shopping District in Kuala Lumpur City Centre. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Universiti Putra Malaysia.
  32. Ujang, N. and Dola, K. (2007). Linking Activity and Place Attachment Dimensions in Enhancing the Sense of Place. Alam Cipta, International Journal on Sustainable Tropical Design Research and Practice. 2 (1). pp. 59-67. ISSN 1823-7231.
  33. Ujang, N. and Shamsuddin, S. (2008). Place Attachment in Relation To Users’ Roles in The Main Shopping Streets of Kuala Lumpur. Sulaiman, A. B. and Mai, M. M. (Eds.). Urban Design Issues in the Developing World, The Case Study in Malaysia and Nigeria. Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, p. 22-42.
  34. Ujang, N. and Shamsuddin, S. (2010). The Influence of Legibility on Attachment towards the Shopping Streets of Kuala Lumpur. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 20 (1): 81 - 92.

[Musaab Sami Al-Obeidy and Rawia Marwan Dabdoob. (2017); REVIEWING ON STREET ATTRIBUTES IN INFLUENCING SENSE OF PLACE AND PLACE ATTACHMENT. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Feb). 356-365] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Musaab Sami Al-Obeidy
Department of Architectural Engineering. Cihan University- Sulaimaniya

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3157      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3157