20Mar 2017

TRIPLE TEST SCORE AS AN EVALUATING FACTOR FOR PALPABLE BREAST LUMP.

  • Professor, General Surgery, Dr.Pinnamaneni Siddartha Institute Of Medical Sciences & Research Foundation, Chinaoutapalli, Krishna Dist, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Professor, General Surgery, Dr.Pinnamaneni Siddartha Institute Of Medical Sciences & Research Foundation, Chinaoutapalli, Krishna Dist, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Junior Resident, General Surgery, Dr.Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute Of Medical Sciences & Research Foundation, Chinaoutapalli, Krishna Dist, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Background: Breast lump is a very sensitive issue and cause of great worry and anxiety to the patient, so a reliable, preferably non-invasive and prompt diagnosis is required. Breast lump should be managed effectively and confidently with a proper protocol plan, ensuring early and best possible treatment for every patient. Triple test assessment was a major breakthrough in this direction, which streamlined the management of palpable breast lump. When all the components of triple test assessment which are Clinical Examination, FNAC, Mammography point to one possibility (are concordant) then the diagnosis is almost certain and management can be confidently planned in such a situation. But if there is discordance among the components of triple test, then what should be the next step in the management plan is the question to be answered. This is where triple test score shows us the path. Objective of the Study: ? To perform Triple Test Score in patients with breast lump. ? To perform Histopathological Examination (HPE) of the breast lump resected. ? To evaluate the efficacy of TTS in comparison with HPE. ? To develop a standard protocol for management of breast lump especially when discordant results are obtained from triple assessment. Materials and Methods: Study was conducted on 200 patients presenting with breast lump to the department of General Surgery at Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, during the period from January 2012 to Dec 2016. It was a prospective study. Women presenting for evaluation of palpable breast lump underwent assessment by clinical examination, mammography and FNAC and got the Triple Test Scoring done. All patients who underwent a complete TTS at our institution were entered into the study. All patients were subjected to necessary surgery, post TTS and followed up with Histopathology of the specimen. A structured proforma was used to collect relevant information from each patient selected. Results: In our study the mean age of the patients was found to be 46.12 ? 1 1.48 years, most of the patients were in the age group of 35-45 years (60%). Positive family history was found in 17%. Patients on an average took 6 months to seek medical help after recognition of the breast lump. Most common location of breast lump was upper outer quadrant. 38 cases were malignant and 148 were benign 14 were intermediate group commonest lump was fibroadenoma, Histopathology was 100% specific in both the groups of study conclusions were made based on clinical radiological and pathological assessment. Conclusion: The study clearly demonstrates the superiority of TTS over other components of triple assessment or all of them put together. A ITS of /=6 indicates malignancy. Only in patients in whom TTS score is 5, biopsy is recommended to obtain a definitive diagnosis. Thus a standard protocol can be developed, for the management of breast lump even with discordant results obtained via triple test assessment, which can be followed universally, thus empowering surgeon to go ahead in managing breast lump effectively and confidently.


  1. Baum M. Carcinoma of the Breast. In-Recent advances in surgery, London. Churchill Livingston, 1984;241: 58.
  2. Bland KI, Beenken SW, Copeland EW. The Breast. In-Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, Charles F. Brunicardi, McGraw Hill 2005, P.470-77.
  3. Ahmed I, Nazir R, Chaudry MY, Kundi S. Triple assessment of Breast lump. JCPSP 2007; 17:535-8.
  4. Al-Mulhim AS, Sultan M, A1-Mulhim FM, Al-Wehedy A, Ali M, Al-Suwaigh A, et al. Accuracy of the triple test in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses in Saudi females. Ann Saudi Med 2003; 23: 158-61.
  5. Robinson IA, Mckee G, Nicholson A, D'Arcy J, Jackson PA, Cook MG, et al. prognostic value of cytological grading of fine needle aspirates from breast carcinomas, Lancet 1994; 343: 947-9.
  6. Donegan WL Evaluation of a palpable breast mass. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 937-42.
  7. Michell MJ. The Breast. In-David S. Text Book of Radiology and Imaging, 6th Ed London: Churchill Livingstone; 1998; P.1429-60.
  8. Scottlind D, Smith BL, Souba WW. Breast complaints. In-Souba, Fink WW, Michell P, Jurkovich GJ, Kaiser LR, Pearsce WH, Pemberton JEI, Soper NJ. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice; Web Med Inc 2007 professional Ed.
  9. Eberl MM, Fox CH, Edge SB, Carter CA, Mahoney MC. BIRADS classification for management of abnormal mammograms. Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 161-4.
  10. Burstein HJ, Harris JR, Morrow M. Malignant tumors of Breast. In- Devita, Hellman, Rosenerg's cancer: Principles and Practice of oncology. Lippincott 2008, 8th ed: P.1612.
  11. Egan RL. Experience with mammography in a tumor institution. Radiology 1960; 75: 894-900.
  12. John V, Rodney P, Waldermar S, Mitchell W, Polly DB, Marla J. Use of the triple test for palpable breast lesions yields high diagnostic accuracy and cost savings. The American Journal of Surgery 1995; 169: 519-22.
  13. Malley FO, Casey TT, Winfield AC, Rodgers WH, John S, Page DL. Clinical correlates of false negative fine needle aspirations of the breast in a consecutive series of 1,005 patients. Surgery Gynecology Obstetrics 1993; 176: 360-4.
  14. Park IE, Ham EK. Fine needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast lesions. Histologic subtype in false negative cases. Actacytologica 1997; 41: 1131-8.
  15. Sreenivas M, Harish K, Reddy SJB, Bhaskaran CS. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast lumps and its histopathological correlation. Indian Journal of Pathology & Microbiology 1989; 32: 133-7.
  16. Joan L, Anderson T J, Dixon MJ, Levack PA. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer screening. Journal of clinical Pathology 1987; 40: 705-9.
  17. Barrows GH, Anderson T J, Lamb JL, Dixon JM. Fine needle aspiration of breast cancer. Relationship of clinical factors to cytology results in 689 primary malignancies. Cancer 1986; 58: 1493-8.
  18. Wolberg WH, Tanner MA, Loh WY. Fine needle aspiration for breast mass diagnosis. Archives of Surgery 1989; 124:814-8.

[B. Anil Kumar, M. M Rehman and K. A. S. S. N. Kalyan. (2017); TRIPLE TEST SCORE AS AN EVALUATING FACTOR FOR PALPABLE BREAST LUMP. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Mar). 213-224] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Dr B Anil Kumar
Professor Dr PSIMS & RF Chinaoutpalli Gannavaram 521286

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3505      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3505