04Jun 2018


  • Department of Economics, Mizan Tepi University, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This paper attempts to assess the contribution of forest resources to rural livelihoods in Bench Maji zone. To conduct this research both qualitative and quantitative information was collected from four woredas in Bench Maji zone through questionnaire, interview and focus group discussion from 200 rural households. The finding of this study shows that the impacts of forest resources to rural livelihood are diverse in terms of livelihood means. Forest income is the second largest source of livelihood diversification next to agriculture. In addition, rural households in the study area use trade, rent of asset, and other source of livelihood strategies. The relationship between socio-economic characters of the respondents with forest resources shows distance, sex, family size, education level and access to agricultural land are significant determinant of forest resource use. As far as natural forest resources have an important contribution in the rural livelihood means, issues on forest resource and rural livelihood should not be ignored in policy decisions and other interventions. Consequently, steps to efficiently use forest resources should be undertaken by different bodies as one of the ways of improving rural households livelihood means.

  1. Bekele Taye. (2001). The potential of Bonga Forest for certification: Paper for National stakeholder workshop on forest certification. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  2. Bench Maji zone trade and industry office. (2012): http://www.benchimaji-tradeindustry. gov.et/ retrieved on 15/11/2016.
  3. (2008). The 2007 Population and Housing Census of Ethiopia report. February 2008. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  4. Dahal, M.R. 2006. Benefit?Cost Analysis of Community Forest and its Distributional Impact on Rural Poor. Economic Journal of Nepal Vol. 29 No 2.
  5. FAO, 2003. State of the world`s forests. pp 151.
  6. Mamo, G., Sjaastad, E. & Vedeld, 2007. Economic dependence on forest resources: A case from Dendi district, Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 916-927 modified on 18 March 2013 at 11:06. Retrieved on 15/11/2013
  7. NTFP, 2004. Non Timber Forest Products Research and Development Project in South-west Ethiopia. Wageningen
  8. Oksanen, T. & Mersmann, C. (2003). Forests in poverty reduction strategies. Assessment of PRSP processes in Sub-Saharan Africa. 121-155.
  9. Paumgarter, F. & Shackleton, C.M. 2011. Wealth differentiation in household use and trade in non-timber production in South Africa. Ecological Economics, Vol 68 Issue 12, pp. 2950?2959.
  10. Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. Brighton: Institute of Development
  11. SDPRP (2002): Sustainable Development and Poverty Reduction Program. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  12. Shackleton and Shackleton, 2006. The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa. South Asian Journal of Science, pp 658-664.
  13. United Nation, 2011. Forests for people fact sheet: international year of forest.
  14. WBISPP (2005). A national strategy plan for the biomass sector. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

[Mulatie Chanie and Tesfaye Yirsaw. (2018); ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF FOREST RESOURCES TO SUSTAINABLE RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN BENCH MAJI ZONE, SOUTH WEST ETHIOPIA. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (6). 1-10] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Department of Economics, Mizan Tepi University, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7180       DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7180

Share this article