30Apr 2018

PROPOSING A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK TO INVESTIGATE CONFLICT: PERSPECTIVE OF A SCUFFLE.

  • Ankaful Psychiatric Hospital Cape Coast, Central Region-Ghana.
  • NYQ Knowledge Solution Cape Coast, Central Region-Ghana.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This paper proposes a theoretical framework for investigating conflict from the perspective of violence (scuffle). This framework is conceived to addressthe deficiencies and challenges in applying the existing theories in investigating violence. The paper employed in-depth content analysis, thematic approach and critical analysis to develop the proposed model for assessing or investigating violence (scuffle). The proposed theoretical framework and models are presented to justify that violence (scuffle) could be analysed taking into account wide range of multi-facets concepts. The framework and models in this paper rely upon the theoretical frameworks which are based on an extensive literature review, comprising general conflict-based theories and violence frameworks, critiquing to identify strengths and incorporating practical realities. The proposed framework or models in this paper revealed that violence could be investigated from two main interactive variables: environmental variables to violence and Parties? propensities to violence. The environmental factors are declassified into contextual or situational factors and external influences which are assessed to be either augmenting or nullifying factors. It is also revealed in the framework or the models that the propensities could be scored based on either inner inducement or inner inhibition to violence.Employing this proposed theoretical framework, investigators, peace experts and conflict managers could identify sources and causes of violence and useful approaches for carrying on investigations into violence. It is recommended that investigators and researchers rely on the proposed models to develop quantitative instrument to assess the likelihood of violence.


  1. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2006).Independent Futures.Creating user-led disability services in a disabling society.
  2. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives.Developmental psychology,22(6), 723.
  3. Douma, P., & De Zeeuw, J. (2004).From transitional to sustainable justice.Clingendael Conflict
  4. Research Unit,1, 1-4.
  5. Galtung, J., &Webel, C. (2007). Peace and conflict studies: looking back, looking forward.Handbook of peace and conflict studies, 397-400.
  6. Gollier, C. (2000). The determinants of the insurance demand by firms.IDEI Working Paper,?468.Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women: an integrated, ecological framework.?Violence against women,?4(3), 262-290.
  7. Issifu, A. K. (2016). Corporate Responsibility in Peace building, Conflict Prevention and Development:The Role of the Mining Sector in Ghana.Journal of Interdisciplinary Conflict Science,?2(2), 2.
  8. Joseph, A., Mehra, P., Prabhudesai, R. G., Dotse, J., Odametey, J. T., Nkebi, E. K., &Prabhudesai, S. (2007). Role of\" effective density\" in improving the accuracy of bottom-pressure based sea level measurements-a case study from gulf of guinea. InOCEANS 2006-Asia Pacific(pp. 1-5). IEEE.
  9. Kendie, S. B. (2010). Conflict Management and Peace-building for Poverty Reduction.Proceedings of the 2010 Harmattan School, GILLBT Press, Tamale.
  10. Kriesberg, L. (1998). Constructive conflicts: from escalation to settlement.
  11. Marshall, M. G., &Gurr, T. R. (2005). Peace and conflict.Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland, USA, http://www. cidcm. umd. edu.
  12. McHugh, P. R. (2005). Striving for coherence: psychiatry?s efforts over classification.Jama,?293(20), 2526-2528.
  13. Nnoli, O. (1998). Ethnicity, Ethnic Conflict and Emigration Dynamics in Sub-Saharan Africa.Appleyard, Reginald (Hg.): Emigration Dynamics in Developing Countries. Aldershot: Ashgate, 207-263.
  14. O?Connor, A. M. (1993). User manual-decisional conflict scale.Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute,1993.
  15. Pietersen, C. (2014). Interpersonal conflict management styles and emotion self-management competencies of public accountants.Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,?5(7), 273.
  16. Raghu, S., Anderson, R. C., Daehler, C. C., Davis, A. S., Wiedenmann, R. N., Simberloff, D., & Mack, R. N. (2006). Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire?.SCIENCE-NEW YORK THEN WASHINGTON-,?313(5794), 1742.
  17. Rasmussen, J. L. (2001). Negotiating a Revolution Toward Integrating Relationship Building and Reconciliation into Ofi ?icial Peace Negotiations.Recon-ciliation, Justice and Coexistence, edited by Mohammed Abu-Nimer, 101-128
  18. Sackey, G. (2010).Investigating Justice Systems in Land Conflict Resolution: A Case Study of Kinondini Municipality, Tanzania.University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC).
  19. Sen, A. (2006). What do we want from a theory of justice?.The Journal of philosophy,103(5), 215-238.
  20. Shadrach III, W. S. (2006).S. Patent No. 7,018,473. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  21. Simmons, K., Stokes, B., &Poushter, J. (2015). NATO publics blame Russia for Ukrainian crisis, but reluctant to provide military aid. Retrieved on 30th October.
  22. Stanko, E. A. (2006). Theorizing about violence: Observations from the economic and social research council\'s violence research program.Violence Against Women,?12(6), 543-555.

[Mark Kobina Sobotie, Senior Specialist and Queku. Isaac Cliford. (2018); PROPOSING A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK TO INVESTIGATE CONFLICT: PERSPECTIVE OF A SCUFFLE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Apr). 1211-1222] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Queku, Isaac Cliford
NYQ Knowledge Solution Cape Coast, Central Region-Ghana

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6970      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6970