01May 2019

COURT INTERPRETATION OF AUDIT EVIDENCE IN THE CASE OF WHITE COLLAR CRIME.

  • Magister of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.
  • Departement of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business,Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This study aims to see how the interpretation of the court (Judges and Public Prosecutors) in seeing the audit evidence presented at the trial of a criminal act. This research is a qualitative research that uses a normative juridical approach. Data is obtained through an interview process and direct observation of the criminal proceedings. The data analysis tool used is a critical discourse analysis developed by Norman Fairclough. The results of this study indicate that between the Public Prosecutor and the Judge have the same view in assessing the audit evidence of the case of the Makassar Maju Savings and Loan Cooperative. Makassar Maju Savings and Loans Cooperative indicated that the Revolving Fund Management Institution had misappropriated funds through the Audit Report of the State Financial Losses Calculation (LHPKKN) calculated by the South Sulawesi BPKP auditor based on audit evidence collected.


  1. Adhami, Chazawi, 2008. HukumPembuktianTindakPidanaKorupsi, Bandung :
  2. Arens et al. 2003. Ninth Edition. Auditing and Assurance Service-An Integrated NewJersey:Prentice Hall
  3. Hasibuan, Ansoridan Ruben. 1990. HukumAcaraPidana. Bandung
  4. KitabUndang-UndangHukumPidana (Criminal Law Book)
  5. KitabUndang-undangHukumAcaraPerdata (KUHAP)
  6. Majid, JamaluddindanKartini. 2016. PotretHubungan auditor-Klien: SebuahStudiInteraksi AkuntansiPeradaban : Vol. II No. 1 Juli 2016
  7. 2002. Auditing. Edisi ke-6, cetakanpertama. Jakarta:SalembaEmpat.
  8. Satyawan, Made Dudy, Khusna, 2017. MengungkapKorupsiMelaluiBukti Audit MenjadiBuktiMenurutHukum. JurnalAkuntansiMultiparadigma, Volume 8, Nomor 1,Hlm 1833-1999 Setiabudhi, RaidanSwardhana, Made. 2015. SanksiHukumterhadapNotaris yang MelanggarKewajibandanLaranganUndang-undangJabatanNotaris.JurnalIlmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan 2016-2017
  9. Sutherland edwin, danCressey, Donald. Principles of criminology. Eleventh Edition, Rowman&Litlefield Inc.1992
  10. Sofyan, Andi, 2013. HukumAcaraPidanaSuatuPengantar. Yogyakarta : RangkangEducation,241
  11. Sutherland, E. H., 1940, ?White Collar Criminality?, American Sociological Review, Vol. 5,No.1:20.
  12. Wulur, Nixon. 2017. KeteranganAhlidanPengaruhnyaTerhadapPutusan Hakim. LexCrimen Vol. VI/No.2/Maret-April/2017
  13. Zakaria, M. AbulgasemdanNassrSalehMohamad Ahmad.(2014). The Role of Audit Evidence Source in Enhancing the Quality and Reliability of Libyan Auditor?s Report. Review Of Integrative Bussiness and Economic Research, 3(1), 1-12.
  14. Fairclough, N. 1995a. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language.London:

[Intan Timur, Ratna Ayu Damayanti and Syamsuddin. (2019); COURT INTERPRETATION OF AUDIT EVIDENCE IN THE CASE OF WHITE COLLAR CRIME. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (5). 23-28] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


INTAN TIMUR
HASANUDDIN UNIVERSITY

Share this article