20Jan 2020


  • Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Law, Economics and Social Sciences, Ibn Zohr University of Agadir, Morocco
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

From the point of view of the capability approach, human development is defined as a process of expanding human capabilities. In other words, well-being must be assessed by the different things that a person can aspire to be or to do or what Amartya Sen calls functionings. The set of functionings vectors that are possible for the individual represents his capability. The latter is, therefore, a substantial freedom which indicates that an individual is free to lead the kind of life he values. Therefore, this paper aims to operationalize these concepts by modeling the capabilities as latent constructs and the functionings as manifest variables. The estimation of the hierarchical model built using the partial least squares approach made it possible to calculate dimensional composite indicators reflecting the level of five human capabilities retained as fundamental dimensions of human development; namely, health, education, shelter, employment and mobility and communication. An overall composite indicator reflecting the level of human development measured in terms of capabilities is also estimated at the level of the sixty sample countries. This paper explores the structural relationships between capabilities, classifies countries according to the level of capabilities and compares the index obtained with the human development index and the gross domestic product per capita.

  1. AGUENANE, N. E. 2019a. ?Economic growth, inequality and poverty: a review in the light of the capability approach?.?Journal dEconomie, de Management, dEnvironnement et de Droit, JEMED 2 (2): 72-85.
  2. AGUENANE, N. E. 2019b.?? Bien-?tre et croissance ?conomique : le tandem inconciliable ? ?. La Revue Marocaine de la Pens?e Contemporaine, RMPC (3)?: 1-17.
  3. Alkire, S. 2007. ?Choosing Dimensions: The Capability Approach and Multidimensional Poverty.? In?The Many Dimensions of Poverty, edited by N. Kakwani and J. Silber,?89-119. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Alkire, S. 2008.??Using the Capability Approach: Prospective and Evaluative Analyses?. In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Applications and Measurement, edited by F. Comim, M. Qizilbash and S. Alkire, 26-50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Becker, J. M., k. Klein, and M. Wetzels. 2012. ?Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative Type Models.? Long Range Planning 45 (5): 359-394.
  6. Chiappero-Martinetti. E. 2008.??Complexity and Vagueness in the Capability Approach: Strengths or Weaknesses?.?In the Capability Approach: Concepts, Applications and Measurement, edited by F. Comim, M. Qizilbash and S. Alkire, 368-309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Chiappero-Martinetti, E., and Roche, J. M.? 2009: ?Operationalization of the Capability Approach. From Theory to Practice: A Review of Techniques and Empirical Applications.? In?Debating Global Society. Reach and Limits of the Capability Approach, edited by E. Chiappero-Martinetti, 157-201. Milano: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.
  8. Ciavolino, E., and M. Nitti. 2010. ?High-order Constructs for the Structural Equation Model.? Paper presented at the?V Meeting on Dynamics of Social and Economic Systems, Benevento, September 20-25.
  9. Comim, F. 2001.??Operationalizing Sens Capability Approach.? Paper presented at the Conference on Justice and Poverty: Examining Sens Capability Approach, Cambridge, June 5-7.
  10. Diamantopoulos, A., P. Riefler, and K. P. Roth. 2008.??Advancing Formative Measurement Models.??Journal of Business Research?61(12): 1203-1218.
  11. Di Tommaso, M. L. 2007. ?Children Capabilities: A Structural Equation Model for India.? The Journal of Socio-Economics 36 (3): 436?450.
  12. Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. ?Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.? Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39-50.
  13. Frediani, A. A. 2010. ?Sen\'s Capability Approach as a Framework to the Practice of Development.??Development in Practice?20 (2): 173?187.
  14. Guinot, C., J. Latreille, and M. Tenenhaus. 2001. ?PLS Path Modelling and Multiple Table Analysis. Application to the Cosmetic Habits of Women in Ile-de-France.??Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 58(2): 247-259.
  15. Hair, J. F., C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2013. ?Editorial-partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance.??Long Range Planning 46(1-2): 1-12.
  16. Henseler, J., C. M., Ringle, and R. R. Sinkovics. 2009. ?The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing.??In Advances in International Marketing, edited by R. R. Rudolf and P. N. Ghauri, 277-319. Bingley: Emerald.
  17. Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2015. ?A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling.? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science?43(1): 115-135.
  18. Henseler, J., G. Hubona, and P. A. Ray. 2016. ?Using PLS Path Modeling in New Technology Research: Updated Guidelines.??Industrial Management & Data Systems?116(1): 2-20.
  19. Hult, G., M. Sarstedt, M. C. Ringle, and J. Hair. 2016. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).?Thousand Oaks :?SAGE Publications.
  20. Jakobowicz, E. 2007.??Contributions aux Mod?les d\'?quations Structurelles ? Variables Latentes. ?? PhD diss., Conservatoire National des Arts et M?tiers-CNAM.
  21. Krishnakumar, J. 2007. ?Going Beyond Functionings to Capabilities: An Econometric Model to Explain and Estimate Capabilities?. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 8 (1) : 39-63.
  22. Krishnakumar, J., and P. Ballon. 2008. ?Estimating basic capabilities: A structural equation model applied to Bolivia.??World Development 36 (6) : 992-1010.
  23. Lacroux, A. 2009. ?Lanalyse des Mod?les de Relations Structurelles par la M?thode PLS : Une Approche ?mergente dans la Recherche Quantitative en GRH.?. Paper presented at the XX?me Congr?s de lAGRH, Toulouse, September 9-11.
  24. Picot-Coupey, K. 2009. ?D?terminants du Choix d\'un Mode d\'Expansion Internationale par un Distributeur : Mod?le Conceptuel et Validation Empirique.? Recherche et Applications en Marketing?24 (4): 23-55.
  25. Qizilbash, M. 2008. ?Amartya Sen\'s Capability View Insightful Sketch or Diistorted Picture?? In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Applications and Measurement, edited by F. Comim, M. Qizilbash and S. Alkire, 275?291. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  26. Ringle, C. M., S. Wende, and J.-M. Becker. 2015. ?SmartPLS 3.? Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH, http://www.smartpls.com.
  27. Robeyns, I. 2005. ?Selecting Capabilities for Quality of Life Measurement.? Social Indicators Research?74 (1): 191-215.
  28. Saisana, M., and S. Tarantola. 2002.?State-of-the-art Report on Current Methodologies and Practices for Composite Indicator Development. Ispra: European Commission.
  29. Sen, A. K. 1992. Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  30. Sen, A. K. 1999a. Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Sen, A. K. 1999b. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Sen, A. K. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Londres: Penguin Books.
  33. Sosik, J. J., S. S. Kahai, and M. J. Piovoso. 2009. ?Silver Bullet or Voodoo Statistics? A Primer for Using the Partial Least Squares Data Analytic Technique in Group and Organization Research.??Group & Organization Management?34(1) : 5-36.
  34. The World Bank. 2010. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank
  35. Tovar, E. 2008.?La S?gr?gation Urbaine : Repr?sentation ?conomique et ?valuation ?thique, avec une Application ? l\'?le-de-France des Ann?es 1990. PhD diss., ?cole des Hautes ?tudes en Sciences Sociales.
  36. Trinchera, L., G. Russolillo, and N. C. Lauro. 2008. ?Using Categorical Variables in PLS Path Modeling to Build System of Composite Indicators.??Statistica Applicata 20 (3-4): 309-330.
  37. United Nations Development Programme. 2016. Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone. New York: UNDP.
  38. Wilson, B., and J. Henseler. 2007. ?Modeling Reflective Higher-order Constructs Using Three Approaches with PLS Path Modeling: A Monte Carlo Comparison.? In Conference Proceedings ANZMAC 2007, edited by M. Thyne, and K. R. Deans, 791?800. Dunedin: ANZMAC.


Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Law, Economics and Social Sciences, Ibn Zohr University of Agadir, Morocco.


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10287       DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10287

Share this article