Vol. 8 (03) pp. 1082-1091 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10727

EFFECT OF AMENDMENT RESIDUE ON SOIL CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, YIELD POTENTIAL AND PROTEIN CONTENT IN SOYBEAN (Glycine Max (L.) MERR)

, , , and
  • Master Student of Agroecotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture UniversitasSyiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia 23111.
  • Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture UniversitasSyiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia 23111.
  • Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture UniversitasSyiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia 23111.
19 Downloads 89 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Biochar rice husks and cow manure as soil amendment have the potential to improve soil chemical properties such as soil pH, CEC, and several compounds such as C-organic, N-total and can fertilize the soil. This research is the third planting season, continued from the previous two planting seasons. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectof residual soil amendment in the third planting season on soil chemical properties, yield potential and protein content of soybean seed. From this research, the residue of soil amendment in the first planting season and the addition in the second planting season showed values that were not much different in each treatment both from the chemical nature of the soil and protein content. Soil pH, P-available and CEC tends to increase in residual cow manure 20 tons ha-1 and 10 tons ha-1 but not significant. Likewise with the potential for large yields in cow manure residues of 20 tons ha-1, another case with the highest crude protein content obtained in the control (R1) (without the soil amendment or fertilizer).

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Budianto A. K. 2009. Food, Nutrition and Human Development in Indonesia: The Basics of Nutrition, Malang: UMM Press 1-16.
  2. El-Beshbeshy, T., N.A. El-Kader, R.E. Shal and N. Khalafallah. 2019. Impacts of biochar application on soil fertility, plant nutrients uptake and maize (Zea mays) yield in saline sodic soil. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 12: 719.
  3. Fathul, F., Liman, N. Purwaningsih and S. Tantalo. 2014. Feed Knowledge and Ration Formulation. Textbooks. Department of Animal Husbandry. Faculty of Agriculture. Lampung.
  4. Fikdalillah, M. Basir, and I. Wahyudi. 2016. The Effect of Giving Cow Manure on Phosphorus Uptake and Yield of White Mustard (Brassica pekinensis) on EntisolSidera. e-J. Agrotekbis 4 (5): 491-499Gani, A. 2009. Food Crop Science and Technology (ISSN 1907-4263) Vol. 4 No. 1, July 2009. p. 33-48.
  5. Gani, A. 2009. Food Crop Science and Technology (ISSN 1907-4263) Vol.4 No.1, July 2009. p. 33-48
  6. Gautam, D.K., R.M, Bajracharya, and B.K. Sitaula. 2017. Effects of Biochar and Farm Yard Manure on Soil Properties and Crop Growth in an Agroforestry Systemin the Himalaya. Journal Sustainable Agriculture Research 6(4) Canadian Centre of Science and Education. 6(4): 74.
  7. Hardjowigeno, S. 2003. Soil Classification and Pedogenesis. Jakarta: Pressindo Academics. 250 p.
  8. Hasanuddin, A., J. R. Hidajat, and S. Patohardjono. 2005. Potential legume research program policy. In Partohardjono (editor). Analysis and Policy Options for Research and Development of Food Crops. Monograph No. 2. Bogor Food Crop Research and Development Center: 64-77.
  9. Herlambang, S., AZ.P. Budi S, H.T. Sutiono, and S. Rina N. 2019. Application of coconut biochar and organic materials to improve soil environmental. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1755-1315.
  10. Kartika, K. , B. Lakitan, Wijaya,? S. Kadir, L. I. Widuri, E. Siaga, and? M. Meihana. 2018. Effects of particle size and application rate of rice-husk biochar on chemical properties of tropical wetland soil, rice growth and yield. Australian Journal and Crop Science. 12 (05):817-826.
  11. Laird, D.A. 2008. The charcoal vision: a win?win?win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agronomy Journal100: 178- 181.
  12. Lakitan, B. 2012. Fundamentals of Plant Physiology. PT Raja GrafindoPersada. Jakarta.
  13. Liu, K. 2004. Soybeans as Functional Foods and Ingredients. AOCS Publishing, USA.
  14. Liu, S., J. Meng, L. Jiang, X.Yang, Y. Lan, X. Cheng, and W.Chen. 2017. Rice Husk Biochar Impacts Soil Phosphorus Availability, Phosphatase Activities and Bacterial Community Characteristics in Three Different Soil Types. Applied Soil Ecology. Vol.116,? P. 12-22. Elsevier.
  15. Mi, W., Y. Sun, S. Xiaa, H.? Zhao, W. Mi, P. C. Brookes, Y. Liu, and? Wu, 2018. Effect of inorganic fertilizers with organic amendments on soil chemical properties and rice yield in a low-productivity paddy soil. Geoderma 320 (2018) 23?29.
  16. Mitsuhashi, N., M. Ohnishi, Y. Sekiguchi, K. Y.U. Kwon, Y.T. Chang, S.K. Chung, Y. Inoue, R.J. Reid, H. Yagisawa, T. Mimura. 2005. Phytic acid synthesis and vacuolar accumulation in suspension-cultured cells of Catharanthusroseusinduced by high concentration of inorganic phosphate and cations. Plant Physiol. 138:1607-1614.
  17. Motlagh, S.M., P. Alireza, D. Babak. 2012. Effect of biological phosphorus and irigation disruption on biomass, seed yield and protein content of canola (Brassica napusL). Int. Res. J. Appl. Basic. Sci. 3:961-967.
  18. Muliawan, N.R.E., J. Sampurno J, M. I. Jumaranga. 2016. Identification of Salinity Value in Agricultural Land in Jungkat District Based on Electrical Conductivity Method. Prisma Physics, Vol. IV, No. 02 (2016), Hal. 69-72.
  19. Mulyani, A. and F. Agus. 2006. Land Potential Supports Agricultural Revitalization. Proceedings of the Multifunction Seminar and Revitalization of Agriculture 27-28 June 2006. Center for Research and Development of Land Resources. Bogor.
  20. Nisa, K. 2010. Effect of NPK and Biochar Fertilization on Soil Chemical Properties, Nutrient Absorption, and Yield of Rice Field Crops. Thesis. Kualia University. Banda Aceh.
  21. Pandit, N.R., J. Mulder., S.E. Hale., A.R. Zimmerman., B.H. Pandit, and G. Cornelissen. 2018. Multi-year Doeble Cropping Biochar Field Trials in Nepal: Finding the Optimal Biochar Dose Throgh Agronomic Trials and Cost-Benefit Analysis. Journal Science of the Total Environment 637-638: 1333-1341.
  22. Purba, J.H., I.P. Parmila, K.K. Sari. 2018. Effect of Sapid Manure and Planting Distance on Growth and Yield (Glycine max L. Merrill) of Edamame Varieties. Agro Bali (Agricultural Journal). Vol. 1 No. 2: 69-81.
  23. Rahmi, A. and Biantary, P. M. 2014. Characteristics of Soil Chemical Properties and Soil Fertility Status of Land and Farming Land in Several Villages in West Kutai District. Ziraaah. 39 (1). 30-36.
  24. Salawati, M. Basir, I. Kadekoh, A. R. Thaha. 2016. Potential of Biochar Rice Husk Against Changes in pH, CEC, Organic C and P Available in Insepticol Paddy Soils. J. Agroland 23 (2): 101 ? 109.
  25. Soil Research Institute. 2009. Chemical Analysis of Soil, Plants, Water and Fertilizers. Soil Research Institute, Bogor.
  26. Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. United States Departement of Agriculture. Natural resources Concervation Services. USA.
  27. Singh, C., S. Tiwari., V.K. Gupta.,and J.S. Singh. 2018. The Effect of Rice Husk Biochar on Soil Nutrient Status, Microbial Biomass and Paddy Productivity of Nutrient Poor Agriculture Soils. Journal CATENA 171: 485-493.
  28. Syamsuddin, S. Takdir and A. Hasan. 2016. The Correlation between Giving Cow Cages Fertilizer with Increased Protein Content and Coarse Fiber of the Legume Clitoriaternatea as Animal Feed Forage. Journal of Tropical Animal Science and Technology (JITRO) VOL. 3 NO. 2.
  29. Tambunan, W. A. 2008. Study of Physical and Chemical Properties of Soils in Relation to Production of Palm Oil (ElaeisguineensisJacq.) In the PTPN II Oil Palm Plantation. Thesis. University of Northern Sumatra. Field.
  30. Wilson, J. R. dan M. M. Ludlow. 1990. The environment and potensial growth of herbage under plantations.Proceeding of workshop, Sanur, Bali, Indonesia. 10--24.
  31. Xie, T., B.Y. Sadasivam, K.R. Reddy, C. Wang. 2016. Review of The Effects of Biochar Amendment on Soil Properties and Carbon Sequestration. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste. Vol: 20 (1).
  32. Yunilasari, M. 2019. Effect of Biochar Dose and Manure on the Chemical Properties of Entisols and the Result of Peanut (Arachishypogeae L.) Second Planting Season. Thesis Master Program in Conservation of Land Resources, Postgraduate Program, Syiah Kuala University.
  33. Zhu, Q., X. Peng, T. Huang., Z. Xie and N.M Holden. 2014. Effect of biochar addition on maize growth and nitrogen use efficiency in Acid Red Soil. Pedospere 24 (6): 699-708.

How to Cite This Article

Cut Risna Gusnita, Helmi, Syakur, Sabaruddin and Desi Badriana (2020); EFFECT OF AMENDMENT RESIDUE ON SOIL CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, YIELD POTENTIAL AND PROTEIN CONTENT IN SOYBEAN (Glycine Max (L.) MERR), Int. J. of Adv. Res., 8 (03), 1082-1091, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10727

Corresponding Author

Cut Risna Gusnita
1. Master Student of Agroecotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia 23111.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.