Vol. 5 (05) pp. 1807-1810 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4313

IPRS AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND TECHNOLOGIES: POLICY OPTIONS FOR THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

  • Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.
43 Downloads 189 Views
Crossref

Abstract

In the present time, no other matter is of as much concern to the developed as well as the developing world alike, as global warming and climate change issues. The Paris deal concluded in December 2015 is the latest step that has been taken to restrict the rise in temperatures to below 2 degrees Celsius as compared to the pre-industrial levels. As like other countries, India has also submitted a set of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), which clearly show her intent of contributing to a better environment for the future generations. Access to smart innovation and technological development is crucial for achieving the outlined targets. Most of the research on Environmentally Sustainable Technologies (ESTs) takes place in the developed countries of Europe, Japan and the USA. This makes it difficult for the developing countries to access such technologies. The principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility as followed under the Kyoto protocol, UNFCCC and the Rio declaration, mandates the developed countries to take the major responsibility of providing their counterparts in the developing world with financial resources and innovative technology. Inspite of this however, not much has been done by the technology leaders. Given the importance of R&D for such technologies, Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs), particularly patents, play a significant role in their innovation and diffusion process. Globally, IPRs in the current times, have been homogenized by the TRIPS agreement of the World Trade Organization (WTO). This does not leave much scope for India and other developing countries to frame their IPR rules individually to their own benefit. Thus, the only possible way through which the developing countries can circumvent the patented technologies, is by using the flexibilities permitted under TRIPS like compulsory licensing, exclusion from patentability and strict implementation of the patentability clause. This seems to be the need of the hour.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Khor, M. (2012). Climate Change, Technology And Intellectual Property Rights: Context And Recent Negotiations.(Research paper no. 45). Geneva: South Centre
  2. Srinivas, R.K (2009). Climate Change, Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights.`(Discussion Paper No. 153).New Delhi: Research and Information System
  3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.(2000). Methodological and Technological Issues in Technology Transfer .Geneva: IPCC
  4. Copenhagen Economics and IPR company. (2009). Are IPR a barrier to the transfer of Climate Change Technology?.
  5. Gattari, P.(2013). The Role of Patent Law in incentivizing Green Technology. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 11(2).
  6. TERI (2009). Emerging Asia contribution on issues of technology for Copenhagen.( (Project Report No. 2008RS09). New Delhi: The Energy and Resources Institute
  7. Lee, B., Ilian, I., and Felix, P. (2009). Who Owns Our Low Carbon Future? Intellectual Property and Energy Technologies. Retrieved from
  8. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/public/Research/Energy,%20Environment%20and%20Development/r0909_lowcarbonfuture.pdf
  9. Watal, J., (1998). The issue of technology transfer in the context of the Montreal Protocol: Case Study of India In (Eds) edited by V. Jha, U. Hoffman, Achieving Objectives of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Package of Trade Measures and Positive Measures. Geneva: UNCTAD.

How to Cite This Article

Saumaly Ghosh. (2017); IPRS AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND TECHNOLOGIES: POLICY OPTIONS FOR THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, Int. J. of Adv. Res., 5 (05), 1807-1810, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4313

Corresponding Author

saumaly ghosh