31Jan 2017

MAIN PREDICTORS ON THE USE OF BIOMATERIALS IN IMPLANT DENTISTRY: A REVIEW

  • University Center North Paulista (Unorp) - São José do Rio Preto – SP, Brazil.
  • Post graduateandcontinuingeducation (Unipos), Street Ipiranga, 3460, São José do Rio Preto SP, Brazil 15020-040.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Over the past 30 years, the number of dental implant procedures has been increasing worldwide, reaching about one million dental implants per year. In Brazil, in the last decades, there has been a very rapid evolution in implant dentistry with high success rates. The development of biomaterials for use in dental clinics in recent years has represented a powerful therapeutic tool in the correction of bone defects. This study aims to analyze and discuss the main types of biological membranes, positives, negatives, their indications and results. For the development of the present revision work, we used a database such as Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Ovid and Cochrane. The main descriptors (MeshTerms) used were "Implantology", "Regenerative Surgery", "Biomembranes", "Bioengineering Bone". Based on the literary findings, both non-absorbable and absorbable membranes are effective in the process of bone regeneration. Absorbents do not require a second surgical time. However, there are information gaps, and further research is needed to ensure the perfect knowledge of the properties of the physical barriers to achieve a perfect bone regeneration of the periodontal bone defects and around implants. Due to bone regeneration and biological barriers in the Grafting surgeries, there was a technological growth of these materials because they pointed out as potential tools for the treatment of bone loss.

  1. Pye AD, Lockhart DEA, Dawson MP, Murray CA, Smith AJ. A review of dental implants and infection. J HospInfect ; 2009, 72:104–110.
  2. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O et al (1977) Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. ScandJPlastReconstrSurgSuppl 16:1–192.
  3. BugarinJúniorJG,GarrafaII V. Bioethics and biosafety: the use of biomaterials in dental practice. Rev SaúdePública 2007;41(2):223-8.
  4. Mazaro JVQ, Godoy PAI, Junior JFS, Mello CC, Pellizzer EP, ZavanelliAC ; Regeneração óssea guiada em implantodontia: relato de caso ; RFO, Passo Fundo, v. 19, n. 1, p. 121-128, jan./abr. 2014.
  5. BusettiJ ; Avaliação histológica e histomorfométrica da regeneração óssea guiada sob membranad]s biológicas não reabsorvíveis em ratas osteoporóticas com e sem tratamento com ácido zoledrônico ; Porto Alegre, 2015.
  6. Fernandes TBG. Utilização de membranas absorvíveis e não absorvíveis em técnicas de regeneração óssea na implantodontia ; Uberlândia, 2015.
  7. Costa JBZ, Silva F, Dultra CA, Souza LF, Santos MCNE ; Uso de membranas biológicas para regeneração óssea guiada em implantodontia – uma revisão de literatura - Revista Bahiana de Odontologia. 2016 Mar;7(1):14-21.
  8. Saghiri MA, Asatourian A, Garcia-Godoy F, Sheibani N. The role of angiogenesis in implant dentistry part II: The effect of bone-grafting and barrier membrane materials on angiogenesis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. (2016), doi:10.4317/medoral.21200.
  9. Covani U, Chiappe G, Bosco M, Orlando B, Quaranta A, Barone A. A 10-year evaluation of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective cohort study. J Periodontol 2012; 83(10):1226-34.
  10. Calasans MD., Fernandes GVO.; Granjeiro, JM. Preservação alveolar com enxertos após exodontias e previamente à instalação de implantes. RevistaImplantnews, 2011, 6: 583-590.
  11. Fontanari LA; Manne JM; Junior WT. Utilização de enxerto homógenos para reconstrução em áreas atróficas pré-implante: banco de ossos. RevistaImplantnews, 2007, 5 (6) : 539-597.
  12. Gimble JM.; Katz AJ.; Bunnell BA. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine. Circ Res; 2013, 100:1249-1260.
  13. Hallman M, Cederlund A, Lindskog S, Lundgren S, Sennerby L. A clinical histologic study of bovine hydroxyapatite in combination with autogenous bone and fibrin glue for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Results after 6 to 8 months of healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001 Apr;12(2):135-143.
  14. Hing K. A. Bone repair in the twenty-first century: biology, chemistry or engineering? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol Sci., 2004, 362( 1825) : 2821-2850.
  15. Langer R. ;Vacanti JP. Tissue Engineering. Science 1993; 260 : 920-926.
  16. Lima, A F.; Martorelli. Enxertos ósseos: características de alguns materiais. Revista ABO Nacional, 2008, 16( 3).
  17. Zago, MA.; Covas, DT. Células-tronco: Origens e Propriedades. In: Células-tronco: A nova Fronteira da medicina. Ed. M. Zago e D. T. Covas, pp. 3-20. Editora Atheneu São Paulo, 2006.
  18. Maiorana C, Sommariva L, Brivio P, Sigurtà D, Santoro F. Maxillary sinus augmentation with anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) and autologous platelet-rich plasma: preliminary clinical and histologic evaluations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003 Jun;23 (3) : 227-235.
  19. Mazzoneto, R. Reconstruções em Implantodontia – Protocolos clínicos para o sucesso e aprevisibilidade. Ed. Napoleão, 2009, 1ªEdição. Nova Odessa – SP, Brasil.
  20. Aubin J. E.; Liu F. The osteoblast lineage. In: Bilizekian, J., Raisz, L., and Rodan, G., editors. Principles of Bone Biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press: 1996, 39-50.
  21. Liu, Y.; Clark, RAF.; Huang, L.; Rafailovich, MH. Hyaluronic acid-gelatin fibrous scaffold produced by electrospinning of their aqueous solution for tissue engineering applications. In Advances inMaterial Design for Regenerative Medicine, Drug Delivery and Targeting/ Imaging 2010; 1140 :131-136.
  22. Nardi N.B.; Meirelles S.L. Mesenchymal stem cells: isolation, in vitro expansion and characterization. HEP 2006; 174 : 249-82.
  23. Locke M, Windsor J, Dunbar PR.Human adipose-derived stem cells: isolation, characterization and applications in surgery.ANZ J Surg, 2009, 79:235-244.
  24. Vacanti, JP.; Langer, R. Tissue engineering: The design and fabrication of living replacement devices for surgical reconstruction and transplantation.Lancet,1999; 354: 32–34.
  25. Mesimäki K, Lindroos B, Törnwall J, Mauno J, Lindqvist C, Kontio R, Miettinen S, Suuronen R:Novel maxillary reconstruction with ectopic bone formation by GMP adipose stem cells.Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg 2009, 38 :201-209.
  26. Chan, YL.; King, NM. Use of focused íon bean milling for investigating the mechanical properties of biological tissues: A study of human primary molars. Journal of the MechanicalBehavior of Biomedical Materials 2009, 2 (4) : 375-383.
  27. Fardin A.C., et al. Enxerto Ósseo em Odontologia: Revisão de Literatura. InnovImplant J, BiomaterEsthet, São Paulo, 2010, 5 (3): 48-52.
  28. Zotarelli Filho IJ, Frascino LF, Greco OT, Araujo JDD, Bilaqui A, Kassis EN, Ardito RV andBonilla-Rodriguez GO. Chitosan-collagen scaffolds can regulate the biologicalactivities of adipose mesenchymal stem cells for tissueengineering. J Regen Med Tissue Eng. 2013; 2:12. http://dx.doi.org/10.7243/2050-1218-2-12.
  29. Simonpieri, A., et al. (2012). Current Knowledge and Perspectives for the Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Part 2: Bone Graft, Implant and Reconstructive Surgery Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 13, 1231-1256.
  30. Tejero, R., Anitua, E. eOrive, G. (2014). Toward the biomimetic implant surface: Biopolymers on titanium-based implants for bone regeneration. Journal of Progress in Polimeral Science, 39, pp. 1406-1447.
  31. Carvalho PSP, Rosa AL, Bassi APF, Pereira LAVD. Biomateriais aplicados a implantodontia. Revista Implantnews2010;7 (3a-PBA):56-65.
  32. Pereira IKC, Fernandes JRS, Melo ITS. Uso de membranas como barreiras protetoras de enxertos ósseos utilizados na implantodontia. Cadernode Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde. Boa Vista, n. 03, 2013.
  33. Caballé-Serrano J, Sawada K, Schuldt Filho G, Bosshardt DD, Buser D, Gruber R. Bone Conditioned Medium: Preparation and Bioassay. J Vis Exp.2015 Jul 8; (101):e52707.
  34. Merli M, Merli I, Raffaelli E, Pagliaro U, Nastri L, Nieri M. Bone augmentation at implant dehiscences and fenestrations. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Oral Implantol.2016 Spring;9(1):11-32.
  35. Moschouris P, Retzepi M, Petrie A, Donos N. Effect of Wnt3a delivery on early healing events during guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res.2016 Mar 27.
  36. Caballé-Serrano J, Sawada K, Miron RJ, Bosshardt DD, Buser D, Gruber R. Collagen barrier membranes adsorb growth factors liberated from autogenous bone chips. Clin Oral Implants Res.2016 Jan 28.
  37. Saghiri MA, Asatourian A, Garcia-Godoy F, Sheibani N. The role of angiogenesis in implant dentistry part II: The effect of bone-grafting and barrier membrane materials on angiogenesis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.2016 Mar 31:0.
  38. Fujioka-Kobayashi M,Sawada K, Kobayashi E, Schaller B, Zhang Y, Miron RJ.Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 9 (rhBMP9) Induced Osteoblastic Behaviour on a Collagen Membrane Compared With rhBMP2. J Periodontol. 2016 Jan 11:1-14.
  39. Dai Z, Shu Y, Wan C, Wu C. Effects of pH and thermally sensitive hybrid gels on osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomater Appl. 2015;29:1272-83.

[Yeda Duarte de Souza Rodrigues, Matheus Furquim Ruis, Larissa Francisco Inacio, Regis Manzini, Wesley Antonio Galhardo Fornazari, Carlos Alberto Costa Neves Buchala, Ana Paula Bernardes da Rosa Maluf Abbud, TaylaneSoffenerBerlanga de Araujo, Elias Naim Kassis and Idiberto Jose Zotarelli Filho. (2017); MAIN PREDICTORS ON THE USE OF BIOMATERIALS IN IMPLANT DENTISTRY: A REVIEW Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Jan). 2113-2123] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Idiberto José Zotarelli Filho
Unesp and Unipos

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/2985      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/2985

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 21 | No. of Views: 112