27Feb 2017

STUDYING STRATEGIES TO EXPLAIN STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZING PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN ORGANIZATIONS WITH OPEN INNOVATION VIEW.

  • Asst. Prof. Department industrial engineering, Islamic Azad University North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
  • Ph.D Student Department industrial engineering, Islamic Azad University North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

In recent years, open innovation has been changed to one of the issues regarded by innovation management. Product development and design (PD&D) organization is a capacity and capability which is able to take an action to convert idea to the product in its own processes. One of the most important management decisions in development and design cycle is to make a decision about this issue that how employees are organized and grouped and how their relationship would be. In this paper, investigating organizational structure and form of PD&D organizations which have an especial importance have been taken into consideration. In the following, owing to the open innovation approach, these organizations are investigated and proper strategies are propounded and then organizational structure proportioned to product lifecycle is proposed.

  1. Jacobides M.G, Billinger S. Designing the boundaries of the firm: from “make, buy, or ally” to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Organization Science 2006; 17 (2), 249-261.
  2. Geum Y, Kim J, Son C, Park Y. Development of dual technology roadmap (TRM) for open innovation: structure and typology. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 2013; (30), 309-325.
  3. Chesbrough, H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press. 2003.
  4. Monsef S, Ismail W.K.W. The impact of open innovation in new product development process. International Journal of Fundamental Psychology & Social Sciences 2012; 2(1), 7-12.
  5. Felin, T., Zenger, T.R. Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy. (2013).
  6. Ades C, Figlioli A, Sbragia R, Porto G, Plonski G, Celadon K. Implementing open innovation: The case of Natura, IBM and siemens. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 2013; 8, 12-25.
  7. Mortara L, Napp J, Slacik I, Minshall T. How to implement open innovation: Lessons from studying large multinational companies. University of Cambridge 2009.
  8. Chiaroni D, Chiesa V, Frattini F. Unravelling the process from closed to open innovation: evidence from mature, asset-intensive industries. R&D Management 2010; 40 (3), 222-245.
  9. Parid V, Larsson T.C, Lsaksson O, Oghazi P. Towards open innovation practices in aerospace industry. International Conference on Research into Design (ICoRD '11) 2011; Bangalore, India, January; 10-12.
  10. Ades C, Figlioli A, Sbragia R, Porto G, Plonski G, Celadon K. Implementing open innovation: The case of Natura, IBM and siemens. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 2013; 8, 12-25.
  11. .[ Bahemia H, Squire B. A contingent perspective of open innovation in view product development projects. Druid summer conference on opening up innovation: strategy, organization and technology 2010; London, England, June: 16-18.
  12. .[ Mortara L, Napp J, Slacik I, Minshall T. How to implement open innovation: Lessons from studying large multinational companies. University of Cambridge 2009.][ Chiaroni D, Chiesa V, Frattini F. Unravelling the process from closed to open innovation: evidence from mature, asset-intensive industries. R&D Management 2010; 40 (3), 222-245.
  13. Chiaroni D, Chiesa V, Frattini F. The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation 2011; 31, 34–43.
  14. Waiyawuththanapoom N, Isckia T, Danesghar F. Ready for open innovation or not? An open innovation readiness assessment model (OIRAM). Proceeding of the International Conference on Intellectual Capital 2013; Washington, USA, October 24-25
  15. Bahemia H, Squire B. A contingent perspective of open innovation in view product development projects. Druid summer conference on opening up innovation: strategy, organization and technology 2010; London, England, June: 16-18.
  16. Laursen K, Salter A. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 2006; 27, 131-150.
  17. Aarabi, S.M., 1997- Designing organizational structure, cultural research bureau
  18. Bunge, M., 1976- A world of systems. Reidel, Dordrecht
  19. Daft, R.L., 1991- Organization Theory and Design, Third Edition: West publishing company.
  20. Chesbrough H, Brunswicker S. Managing Open Innovation in Large Firms. Survey Report | Executive Survey on open Innovation 2013. Germany: Fraunhofer IAO.

[Mehdi Nikfarjam, Hossein Aghaei Ata, Ebrahim Mohammadi Pirlar and Mojtaba Kheyrinejad. (2017); STUDYING STRATEGIES TO EXPLAIN STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZING PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN ORGANIZATIONS WITH OPEN INNOVATION VIEW. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Feb). 1483-1489] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

hossein aghaei ata
islamic azad university north tehran branch

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3304      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3304

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 18 | No. of Views: 115