Vol. 5 (02) pp. 1496-1504 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3306

ANALYSIS OF STRESS ON TWO POSTS WITH DIFFERENT LUTING SYSTEMS – THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT STUDY.

  • Post graduate student, dept of prosthodontics, drs sudha & nageswararao siddartha institute of dental sciences, chinnoutapalli.
  • Professor and hod, dept of prosthodontics,drs sudha & nageswararao siddartha institute of dental sciences, chinnoutapalli.
  • Professor, dept of prosthodontics,drs sudha & nageswararao siddartha institute of dental sciences, chinnoutapalli.
  • Reader , dept of prosthodontics,drs sudha & nageswararao siddartha institute of dental sciences, chinnoutapalli.
  • Senior lecturer, dept of prosthodontics,drs sudha & nageswararao siddartha institute of dental sciences, chinnoutapalli.
  • Consultant endodontist.
29 Downloads 166 Views
Crossref

Abstract

Aim:. The aim of this study was to investigate, by means of three-dimensional finite element analyses (3D-FEA), the influence of post materials and luting cements on stress distribution within posts, root dentin and their displacement under 100N identical perpendicular loading, Materials and Methods: A 3 mm section of endodontically treated canine tooth was scanned and reconstructed for 3-D modelling and Finite Element analysis(FEA). A ceramic post (CP) and a glass fibre post (GFP) were tested individually with four luting cements zinc phosphate (ZPH), glass ionomer (GI), resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and resin based cements (RC). A push-out test was conducted by subjecting all models to 100 N perpendicular loading at the post. Results: The maximum stresses generated along the CP-cement interface were significantly higher than corresponding stresses in the GFP-cement interface regardless of the cement type. GFP generated seven times higher stresses within theroot dentine than metal posts when ZPH and GI were used, and three times higher when RMGI and RC were used. The displacement of GFP was double (20µ) the displacement of CP (50µ) in all groups. Conclusions: The low elastic modulus of GFP generated lower stresses along its interface and higher stresses within the root dentine, therefore the probability of debonding and root fracture in the GFP group was lower.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. SA Romeed, SM Dunne. Stress analysis of different post-luting systems: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Australian Dental Journal 2013;58:82–88.
  2. Fernando Zarone, Roberto Sorrentino, DavideApicella , Bartolomeo Valentino, Marco Ferrari , R. Aversa, A. Apicella. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: A 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Dental materials 2006;22:1035–44.
  3. ShindeHarshada H. Finite Element Analysis: Basics And Its Applications In Dentistry. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. March 2012;1:4.
  4. Ho M.H, Lee, S. Chen, H. and Lee, M., Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effects of posts on stress distribution in dentin, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry1994;72:367-72.
  5. Toparli, M., Gokay, N. and Aksoy, T. An investigation of the stress values on a tooth restored by amalgam, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1999;26:259-63.
  6. Rubin, C., Krishnamurthy, N., Capilouto, E. and Yi, H., Stress analysis of the human tooth using a three-dimensional finite element model, Journal Dental Research  1983;62:82-86.
  7. Ko, C.C., Chu, C.S., Chung, K.H. and Lee, M.C., Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry1992;68:421-27.
  8. Toparli, M., Gokay, N. and Aksoy, T. Analysis of a restored maxillary second premolar tooth by using three-dimensional finite element method, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2000;26:157-64.
  9. F.V. Santos, J.B.C. Meira,C.B. Tanaka1, T.A. Xavier,R.Y. Ballester, R.G. Lima,C.S. Pfeifer and A.Versluis .Can Fiber Posts decrease Root Stresses and Reduce Fracture? J Dent Res 2010;89(6):587-91.
  10. Miguel Go´mez-Polo, Blanca Llido, Antonia Rivero, Jaime del R?´o , Alicia Celem?´n. A 10-year retrospective study of the survival rate of teeth restored with metal prefabricated posts versus cast metal posts and cores. Journal of dentistry 2010;38:916-20.
  11. Michael Naumann, Guido Sterzenbac, Martin Rosentritt,FlorianBeuer,and Roland Frankenberger. Is Adhesive Cementation of Endodontic Posts Necessary?JEndod 2008;34:1006 –10.
  12. Wakabayashi, M. Ona, T. Suzuki,Y. Igarashi. Nonlinear finite element analyses: Advances and challenges in dental applications. Journal of dentistry 2008;36:463-71.
  13. Bitter K, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Effects of pretreatment and thermocycling on bond strength of resin core materials to various fiber-reinforced composite posts. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:481–89.
  14. Kiyoshi Tajima, Ker-Kong Chen, Nobusuke Takahashi, Naoaki Noda, Yuki NagamatsuAnd Hiroshi Kakigawa. Three-dimensional finite element modeling from CT images of tooth and its validation. Dental Materials Journal 2009; 28(2):219?
  15. Sindel, R. Frankenberger, N. Kramer, A. Petschelt.Crack formation of all-ceramic crowns dependent on different corebuild-up and luting materials. Journal of Dentistry 1999;27:175–81.
  16. Carlos J. Soaresa, Fernanda R. Santanaa, Carolina G. Castroa, Paulo C.F. Santos-Filhoa,Paulo V. Soaresa, Fang Qianb, Steven R. Armstrong. Finite element analysis and bond strength of a glass post to intraradicular dentin: Comparison between microtensile and push-out tests. Dental materials 2008;24;1405–11.
  17. Scianamblo M. Restorations and endodontic success: The correlationship of post-endodontic restorations and endodontic success: rationale and materials. EndodPract 2002:29–39.

How to Cite This Article

Lakshmi tejaswi kancharana, kaleswara rao atluri, sunil chandra tripuraneni, hemchand surapaneni, premalatha averineni, durga prasad tadi, sriharsha babu vadapalli and anwesh ghanapurapu. (2017); ANALYSIS OF STRESS ON TWO POSTS WITH DIFFERENT LUTING SYSTEMS – THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT STUDY., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 5 (02), 1496-1504, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3306

Corresponding Author

Dr. LAKSHMI TEJASWI KANCHARANA
Prosthodontist