30Mar 2017

MAIN PREDICTORS OF BONE CREST PRESERVATION WITH THE USE OF THE SWITCHING PLATFORM.

  • University Center North Paulista (Unorp) - S?o Jos? do Rio Preto ? SP, Brazil.
  • Post graduateandcontinuingeducation (Unipos), Street Ipiranga, 3460, S?o Jos? do Rio Preto SP, Brazil 15020-040.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This study examined the effects of the use of Platform Switching in rehabilitation implantossuportadas. It is a technique that consists in fitting a prosthetic component of smaller diameter the platform of implant with larger diameter, so that there is no combination in the size of both, as in conventional manner. The results showed that the benefits and the indication of the use of this technique is due to reason that the same initial reduces the reabsorption of bone Christian peri-deploy and maintain this level bone in the course of time, as well as reduces the forces on the bone tissue adjacent to the cervical region of the implant. Although there are possible disadvantages in the use of Platform Switching, which may cause an increase of tensions in the region of the screw and prosthetic component, its adaptation in rehabilitation implantossuportadas has been very attractive.

  1. Al Amri MD,Al-Johany SS,?Al Baker AM,?Al Rifaiy MQ,?Abduljabbar TS,?Al-Kheraif AA. Soft tissue changes and crestal bone loss around?platform-switched?implants?placed at crestal and subcrestal levels: 36-month results from a prospective split-mouth clinical trial. Clin Oral?Implants??2016 Oct 14.
  2. Cassetta M,Driver A,?Brandetti G,?Calasso S. Peri-implant?bone loss around?platform-switched Morse taper connection?implants: a prospective 60-month follow-up study. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg.?2016; 45(12):1577-1585.
  3. Anchieta RB,Machado LS,?Hirata R,?Coelho PG,?Bonfante EA. Survival and failure modes:?platform-switching?for internal and external hexagon cemented fixed?dental Eur J Oral Sci.?2016; 124(5):490-497.
  4. Abrahamsson, I; Berglundh, T; Lindhe, J. The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. Na experimental study in dogs. J ClinPeriodontol.; 24:568-72, 1997.
  5. Adell, R, Lekholm, U, Rockler, B. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. I. A three year longitudinal prospective study. Int. J. Oral Surg.; 15: 39-52, 1986.
  6. Albrektsson, T.; Wennerberg, A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2--review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces.??????? Int J Prosthodont, 17(5): p. 544-64, 2004.
  7. Ashley, ET.; Covington, LL.; Bishop, BG.; Breault, LG. Ailing and failing endosseous dental implants: a literature review. J Contemp Dent Pract.; 4(2):35-50, 2003.
  8. Atieh, MA.; Ibrahim, H.M.; Atieh, A.H. Platform Switching for Marginal Bone Preservation Around Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Periodontol,;2010; 81(10):1350-66.
  9. Baumgarten, H.; Cocchetto, R.; Testori, T. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: initial observations and case report. Pract. Proced. Aesthet. Dent., Mahwah, v. 17, no. 10, p. 735-740, Nov./Dec. 2005.
  10. Becker, J., Ferrari, D., Herten, M. Influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at nonsubmerged titanium implants: A histomorphometrical study in dogs. J. Clin. Periodontol.; 34: 1089-96, 2007.
  11. Becker, K., Mihatovic, I., Golubovic, V. Impact of abutment material and dis-/re-connection on sof t and hard tissue changes at implants with platform-switching. J. Clin. Periodon?tol.; 39(8): 774-80, 2012.
  12. Bezerra, F. J. B.; Sales; Pessoa, R.; Soares, M. A. D.; Takamori, Esther; Lenharo, A; Bortolli, M; Rosa, C. Strong SW. 2013.
  13. Bilhan, H.; Mumcu, E.; Erol, S.; Kutay, O. Influence of platforms witching on marginal bone levels for implants with mandibular overdentures: a retrospective clinical study. Implant Dent, Jun; 19(3):250-8, 2010.
  14. Bozkaya, D.; Muftu, S. M.S.; Muftu, A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J ProsthetDent.; 92(6):523-530, 2004.
  15. Busato, A. L. S., Barbosa, N. A., Baldissera, R. A. Dent?stica: Restaura??es em dentes anteriores. S?o Paulo: Artes M?dicas, 1997.
  16. Calabrez-Filho, S.; Cunha, N.; Silva Costa, C.H. da; Calabrez, V. C. do N.; Calabrez, ?. F. de S. Plataforma reduzida, uma solu??o est?tica. Revis?o de Literatura. Rev. bras. odontol., Rio de Janeiro, v. 69, n. 2, p. 207-11, jul./dez. 2012.
  17. Calvo-Guirado, J. L.; Ortiz-Ruiz, A.J.; L?pez-Mar?, L.; Delgado Ruiz, R.; Mat?-S?nchez, J. Bravo Gonzalez, L.A. Immediate maxillary restoration of single-tooth implants using platform switching for crestal bone preservation: a 12-month study. Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants.; 24(2):275-81, 2009.
  18. Canullo, L.; Fedele, G.R.; Iannello, G.; Jepsen, S. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res.; 21(1):115-21, 2010.
  19. Cappiello, M., Luongo, R., DI Iorio, D.Evaluation of pe?riimplant bone loss around platform switched implants. Int. J. Periodon?tics Restorative Dent.; 28: 347-55, 2008.
  20. Cehreli, M.; Duyck, J.; Cooman, M.; Puers, R.; Naert, I. Implant design and interface force transfer. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. Apr;15(2):249-57, 2004.
  21. Chang, C.L.; Chen, C.S.; Hsu, M.L. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,; 25(2):295-304, 2010.
  22. Cocchetto, R.; Traini, T.; Caddeo, F.; Celletti, R. Evaluation of hard tissue response around wider platform-switched implants. Int J PeriodonticsRestorativeDent,; 30(2):163, 2010.
  23. Dorigon, F., Valiati, R., Pfeiffer, A. B. Implica??es da perda ?ssea peri-implantar em ?rea est?tica. Innovations Implant Journal Bioma?terials and Esthetics.; 3 (5) - Maio/Agosto, 2008.
  24. Fickl, S.; Zuhr, O.; Stein, J.M.; H?rzeler, M.B. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 25(3):577-8, 2010.
  25. Gardner, D. M. Platform switching as means to achieving implant esthetics. NY State Dent J , New York, v. 71, n.3, p. 34-37, Apr 2005.
  26. Ghilardi, M. A. Plataforma Switching: uma revis?o sistem?tica. Programa de Especializa??o em Implantodontia - FUNORTE/SOEBR?S N?CLEO Florian?polis, 2011.
  27. Guirado, J. L. C., Yuguero, M. R. S., Zamora, G. P. Immediate provisionalization on a new implant design for esthetic restoration and preserving crestal bone. Implant Dent.; 16: 155-64, 2007.
  28. Gurgel-Juarez, NC.; Almeida, EO.; Rocha, EP.; Freitas, AC.; Anchieta, RB.; Vargas, L.C.; Kina. S.; Fran?a, F.M. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type. J Prosthodont. Apr;21(3):160-6, 2012.
  29. Hsu, JT.; Fuh, LJ.; Lin, DJ.; Shen, YW.; Huang, H.L. Bone strain and interfacial sliding analyses of platform switching and implant diameter on an immediately loaded implant: experimental and three-dimensional finite element analyses. J Periodontol; 80(7):1125-32, 2009.
  30. Isidor, F. Influence of forces on peri-implant????????? ????? Clin Oral Implants. Res; 17:8-18, 2006.
  31. Jones, AA.; Cochran, D.L. Consequences of implant design. Dent Clin N Am. 2006; 50:339-60.
  32. Lazzara, RJ; Porter, S S. Platform Switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorativecrestal bone levels. lnt J Periodontics Restorative Dent, v.26, n. 1, p 9-17, Feb 2006.
  33. Luongo, R.; GUIDONE, P. C.; COCHETTO, R. Hard and soft tissue responses to the platform-switching technique. lnt J Periodontics Restorative Dent, v. 28, n. 6, p. 551-557, Dec 2008.
  34. Maeda, Y; Miura, J; Taki, I., Sogo, M. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale ?Clin Oral Implants Res; 18(5):581-4, 2007.
  35. Miyata, T, Kobayashi, Y, Araki, H. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on periimplant tissue: A histologic study in monkeys. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants.; 13: 677-83, 1998.
  36. Neves, FD; Fernandes Neto, AJ; Oliveira, MRS; Lima, JHF;Galbiatti, MAD. Sele??o de intermedi?rios para implantes Branemark-comp?tiveis ? Parte II : Casos de implantes individuais. RevBrasProtClin Lab. 2000, 2, 6, 08-25.
  37. Nogueira, M. da C. F.; Bacchi, At.; Santos, M. B. F. dos; Mesquita, M. F.; Consani, R. L. X. Efeitos da plataforma switching em reabilita??es implantossuportadas ? revis?o de literatura. RFO, Passo Fundo, 17, 1:113-119,
  38. Pellizzer, E.; Falc?n-Antenucci, R.M.; Perri DE Carvalho, P.; Santiago Junior, J.; DE Moraes, S.L.; Carvalho, B. Photoelastic analysis of the influence of Platform switching on stress distribution in implants. J Oral Implantol, 2010.
  39. Pessoa, RS.; Vaz, LG.; Marcantonio, Jr. E.; Vander Sloten, J.; Duyck, J.; JAECQUES, S.V.N. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching indifferent Implant protocols-CT based 3D finite element analysis. Int J. Oral Maxillofac. Sep-Oct;25(5):911-9, 2010.
  40. Pillar, RM., Deporter, DA., Watson, PA. Dental implant design: Effect on bone remodeling. J. BiomedMater Res.; 25: 467-83, 1991.
  41. Pinto, LP.; Ferreira, A. G. M.; Oliveira, HTR. de; Caudeiro, F. S. Reconstru??o de maxila atr?fica com enxerto de t?bia para posterior reabilita??o com implantes osseointegrados: relato de caso cl?nico. Revista Brasileira de Implantodontia e Pr?tese sobre Implantes, 11, 41,42-47, 2000.
  42. Schrotenboer, J; Tsao, YP.;Kinariwala, V. Wang, HL. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis. Implant Dent; 2009; 18(3):260-9.
  43. Sieber, CA. Key to enhancing natural esthetics in anterior resto rations: the light optical behavior on spinell luminaries. J. EstheticDent.; 8(3): 99-119, 1999.
  44. Silva, CR; Gennari Filho, H; Goiato, MC. Perda ?ssea em pr?tese sobre implante: revis?o de literatura. Revista Odontol?gica de Ara?atuba, v.32, n.1, p. 32-36, Janeiro/Junho, 2011.
  45. Tabata, L.F.; Rocha, E.P.; Bar?o, V.A. Assun??o, W.G. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 26(3):482-91, 2011.
  46. Tonella, BP.; Pellizzer, EP.; Falc?n-Antenucci, RM.; Ferra?o, R. Faria, AD. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.JCraniofac Surg. 2011.
  47. Vigolo, P.; Givani, A. Platform switched restorations on wide-diameter implants: A 5-year clinical prospective study. Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants, 2009; 24, 1, 103-109.
  48. Yun, H.J.; Park, J.C.; Yun, J.H.; Jung, U.W.; Kim; C.S.; Choi, S.H.; Cho, K.S..A short-term clinical study of marginal bone level change around microthreaded and platform-switched implants. J Periodontal ImplantSci.;41(5):211-7, 2011.
  49. Zanatta, L. C. S. Efeito de diferentes desenhos do pesco?o e conex?es prot?ticas de implantes osseointegr?veis na distribui??o das tens?es na regi?o de cortical ?ssea: estudo pela t?cnica da fotoelasticidade. Disserta??o de Mestrado apresentada ao Programa de P?s Gradua??o em Odontologia da Universidade Paulista, S?o Paulo, 2013.
  50. Ramdomized controlled trial comparing a variable-thread novel tapered and a standard tapered implant: interim one-year results. J. Prosthet. Dent. v.101, p.293-305, 2009.

[Mariana Amancio Luccas, Raphael Alves de Souza, Isabella Varollo Silva, Taylane Soffener Berlanga de Araujo, Elias Naim Kassis, Leandro Moreira Tempest and Idiberto Jose Zotarelli Filho. (2017); MAIN PREDICTORS OF BONE CREST PRESERVATION WITH THE USE OF THE SWITCHING PLATFORM. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Mar). 2219-2227] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Dr. Idiberto
Unipos and Unesp

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3745      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3745

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 11 | No. of Views: 74