30Mar 2017

LEGAL PROTECTION OF CONVENTIONAL CRIME VICTIM (RESTORATIVE JUSTICE APPROACH).

  • Graduate School, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The rights of crime victims, particularly crime victims or conventional crime in relation to the efforts to achieve restorative justice in the criminal justice system in Indonesia.This research was a socio-legal research, which orientation is focused on legal and non-legal aspects and the operation of law in society. The results of the research indicates that the essence of legal protection for crime victims in the handling of conventional crime in Indonesia is not yet optimal to take attention and gives legal protection to conventional crime victim in achieving fairness, expediency and legal certainty as a legal purpose. Conventional crime victims are an integral part of a legal system, which received less attention in obtaining their rights in the criminal justice system in Indonesia.Legal protection of conventional crime victim in Indonesia has been set in legislations, but it is not optimal because the mostly of legislation is more focused of legal protection to the perpetrators rather than the victims. As a result, the implementation of legal protection for conventional crime victim is not optimal, so it is very important the understanding of community, the victim and also law enforcement officers in the implementation of rules and mechanisms of legal protection against conventional crime victims to get their rights.

  1. Ahmad Kamil. (2012). Mediasi Penal dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia: Jakarta.
  2. Anshari Dimyati.(2013). Kebijakan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi dan Korban. Tesis. Universitas Diponegoro : Semarang.
  3. Bambang Sunggono. (1991). Metode Penelitian Hukum. PT RajaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta.
  4. Barda Nawawi Arief. (2001). Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan.? Citra Aditya Bakti : Bandung.
  5. Barda Nawawi Arief. (2002). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. RajaGrafindoPersada :
  6. Bedi Setiawan Al Fahmi. (2009). Perlindungan Korban Tindak Pidana Perkosaan Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 1 Vol. 16, 2009.
  7. Budiyanto. (2000). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Tata Erlangga : Jakarta.
  8. Eva Achjani Zulfa. 2010. Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan. Lubuk Agung : Bandung.
  9. W.R Wade. (1970). Administrative Law. Third Edition. Clarendon Prees : Oxford University.
  10. Hamid A. Attamimi. (1990). Peranan Keputusan Presiden RI Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Negara. Diss Graduate School Universitas Indonesia : Jakarta.
  11. Ira Dwiati. (2007). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Perkosaan Dalam Peradilan Pidana. Thesis. Universitas Diponegoro : Semarang.
  12. C.T. Simorangkir and Woerjono Sastropranoto.(1959). Hukum Indonesia. Gunung Agung: Jakarta.
  13. Lies Sulistiani. (2010). Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban di Indonesia. Press Release No.02/LPSK/PR/II/2010. Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Republik Indonesia: Jakarta.
  14. Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. (2003). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. PT. Alumni: Bandung.
  15. Muhadar et al. (2010). Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Putera Media Nusantara: Surabaya.
  16. Muhammad Tahir Azhary.Negara Hukum Indonesia Analisis Yuridis Normatif Tentang Unsur-Unsurnya.UI-Press: Jakarta.
  17. Munir Fuady. (2009). Negara Hukum dan Demorasi. Kencana Prenada Group: Jakarta.
  18. Mushammad Asrun. (2001). Krisis Peradilan Mahkamah Agung di bawah Soeharto.ELSAM. Lemabaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat : Jakarta.
  19. Philipus Hadjon. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia Sebuah Study Prinsip-prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara, PT. Bina Ilmu : Surabaya.
  20. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka : Jakarta.
  21. Rena Yulia. (2011). Viktimologi: Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan. hlm 164-165. Jurnal Intelek Volume 7 3, 2011.
  22. Ridwan, H.R. (2007). Hukum Administrasi Negara. PT RajaGrafindo : Jakarta.
  23. Roeslan Saleh. (1984). Segi Lain Hukum Pidana. Ghalia Indonesia: Jakarta.
  24. Romli Atmasasmita. (2001). Masalah Santunan Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana,? Majalah Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman. 1992. Pages 44-45
  25. (2010). Sistem Sanksi Dalam Hukum Pidana. PT RajaGrafindo : Jakarta.
  26. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.
  27. (2008). Implementasi Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Dalam Pasal 98 KUHAP Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan di Wilayah Hukum Semarang. Universitas Diponegoro: Semarang.
  28. United Nation Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuseof Power 29 November 1985.

[Taswin Imransyah, Andi Sofyan, Syamsuddin Muchtar and Wiwie Heryani. (2017); LEGAL PROTECTION OF CONVENTIONAL CRIME VICTIM (RESTORATIVE JUSTICE APPROACH). Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Mar). 1773-1783] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Taswin Imransyah
Graduate School, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3690      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3690

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 39 | No. of Views: 216