30Apr 2017

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FIVE STEPS TO SAVE SURGERY PRACTICE IN IMPROVING THE CHECKLIST WRITING OBEDIENCE IN RSKB ANNUR YOGYAKARTA.

  • Master of hospital managemet post graduate studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
  • Master of nursing science Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The aims of this research is to provide an overview about the checklist safer surgery writing obedience in RSKB ANNUR Yogyakarta. Quasi experiment is used in this research. The used-design experiment is one-group pretest-posttest design where there should be pretest after treatment and posttest after treatment. There is a little deviation among mean, standard deviation, and standard eror. It can be concluded that the surgery team has been obedient in implementing pre and post safety surgery. The r correlation is 0.061 showing the contribution of checklist safety surgery socialization. The obedience level is 0.37% while the resr is caused by anotgher factor. The significant value is 0,709 (Sig.>0,05) showing that there is no correlation between socialization of pre and post checklist safety surgery and the surgery team obedience. The implementation of briefing with pre-Safety Surgery Checklist cannot be correlated since the standard error is 0.000. The sign-in implementation with in-Safety Surgery Checklist is more effective with Sig value (p) is 0,031 (p<0,050) where it means that Ho is denied. There is significant difference in pre and post safety surgery writing. The implementation of time out with Safety Surgery Checklist in surgery is ineffective with the Sig (p) value is 0,323 (p>0,050) where it means that Ho is accepted so there is not significant difference between checklist time out obedience and pre-post safety surgery implementation. The debriefing implementation with in-Safety Surgery Checklist is ineffective since the Sig (p) value is 0, 160 (p>0,050) where it means that Ho is accepted, so there is not significant difference between the obedience of checklist sign out writing before pre and post safety surgery implementation. The Five Steps To Safer Surgery implementation in RS ANNUR Yogyakarta is ineffective since the Sig (p) value is 0, 164 (p>0,050) where it means that Ho is accepted, so there is not significant differnce between surgery team?s obedience and pre and post safety surgery implementation.

  1. Allard, Jon, et al 2011, Pre-surgery briefings and safety climate in the operating theatre. BMJ Quality & Safety. Situs: http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/20/8/711.short. Diakses pada Selasa 09 Juli 2013 jam 20.26 WIB.
  2. Azwar A 1996, Menuju Pelayanan Kesehatan Yang Lebih Bermutu, Yayasan Penerbitan Ikatan Dokter Indonesia, Jakarta.
  3. Baldrige & Malcolm 2009, The monthly publication for OR decision makers, Or Manajer, 25(3).
  4. Dale, W., Bratzler 2005, Use of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Major Surgery: Basaline Results From The National Surgical Infection Prevention Project Arch Surg. 2005; 140 (2):147-182.
  5. Departemen Kesehatan R.I 2001, Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Indikator Mutu Pelayanan Rumah Sakit, Dirjen Yanmed, Jakarta.
  6. Gawande, Atul A., et al. "Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery." New England Journal of Medicine3 (2003): 229-235. Diakses: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa021721. Diakses pada: Selasa, 09 Juli 2013 jam 19.25 WIB.
  7. Haynes, Alex, B., Weiser, Thomas, G., Berry, William, R., Lipsitz, Teodoro, Joseph, Sudhir, Kibatala, Pascience, L., Lapitan, Marie, C.M., Merry, Alan, F., Moorthy, Krishna., Reznick, Richard, K., Taylor, Bryce, Gawande, Atul. (2009) A Surgical Safety Checklist ti reduse morbidity and mortality in a global population. The New England journal of medicine, 360(5), pp.491-9.
  8. Kementerian Kesehatan R.I 2011, Standar Akreditasi Rumah Sakit, Dirjen Bina Pelayanan Medik, Jakarta.
  9. Keputusan Direktur Jendral Bina Upaya Kesehatan Nomor HK. 02.04/I/2790/11 tentang standar akreditasi rumah sakit.
  10. Lingard, L., Espin, S., Rubin, B. (2005) Getting teams to talk: development and pilot implementation of checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR. Quality & Safety in health care, 14(5), pp.340-6.
  11. Munchof & Wendy 2005, Antibiotic for Surgical prophylaxis. Control, (2), pp. 38-40.
  12. National Patient Safety Agency, 2009, Five steep for suger safety
  13. Notoatmodjo, S 2002, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka
  14. Notoatmodjo, Soekidjo. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  15. Paull, Douglas E., et al. "Briefing guide study: preoperative briefing and postoperative debriefing checklists in the Veterans Health Administration medical team training program." The American Journal of Surgery5 (2010): 620-623. Situs: http://www.americanjournalofsurgery.com/article/S00029610%2810%2904-X/abstract. Diakses pada Selasa, 09 Juli 2013 jam 19.51 WIB
  16. Panesar et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2011, 6:18. Situs: http://www.josr-online.com/content/6/1/18. Diakses pada: Rabu, 10 Juli 2013.
  17. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 147/MENKES/PER/I/2010 Tentang Perizinan Rumah Sakit
  18. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1691/MENKES/PER/VIII/2011 Tentang Keselamatan Pasien Rumah Sakit.
  19. Sadgrove, K 2005, The Complete Guide to Business Risk Management. Gower Publishing Limited: Burlington.
  20. Santoso, T 2010, Assesmen Dalam Praktek Pekerjaan Sosial. Situs: http//Kesos. Unpad. ac.id/.
  21. Senior & Kathryn 2009, WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has value worldwide, The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 9(4), pp.211.
  22. Showan, A. & Kennedy, S 1999, Manajemen of the operating room. Seminars in Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain, 18(2), pp.117-124.
  23. Smyth, E.T.M. & Emmerson, A.M 1996, Surgical site infection surveillance surgery, S. & Lives, S. (2008) IMPLEMENTATION MANUAL
  24. Sugiyono, 2010. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : Alfabeta
  25. Undang-Undang No. 44 tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit.
  26. Verdaasdonk, E.G.G., Stassen, L.P.S., Widhiasmara, P.P., Dankelman, J 2009, Requirements for the design and implementation of checklist for surgical processes. Surgical endoscopy, 23(4), pp. 715-26.
  27. Vries, E., Eefje, N., Ditjkstra, Lucia, Smorenburg, Susanne, M., Meijer, R.P., Boermeester, Marja 2010, The Surgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist optimizes timimg of antibiotic prophylaxis P,atient Safety in Surgery, 4(1), p.6.
  28. Walfoord, B. Dan Aderson, VJ 1988, Grading Efektif (Jossey Bass)Yulk, G 2005, Leadership in Organization, Fifth Ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

[Lucky Frannata and Elsye Maria Rosa. (2017); THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FIVE STEPS TO SAVE SURGERY PRACTICE IN IMPROVING THE CHECKLIST WRITING OBEDIENCE IN RSKB ANNUR YOGYAKARTA. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Apr). 2001-2007] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Lucky Frannata
Master of hospital managemet post graduate studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4044      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4044

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 16 | No. of Views: 116