15May 2017

THE ANALYSIS ON POLICY ABOUT RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT.

  • Magister Program of Public Administrative Science, Concentration on Public Policy, Faculty of Administrative Science, Brawijaya University Malang.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The availability of fossil energy reserves in Indonesia was in fact increasingly critical.Some efforts, therefore, must be taken to develop new-renewable energy. This study was aimed to analyze the policy on new-renewable energy by examining Innovative Program for ConvertingGarbage into Energy in Kepanjen District, Malang Regency. Some findings were found. The program for renewable energy development was already stated in Local Regulation (Perda) No.2/2011 on Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD) for period 2010 to 2015. There were three institutions responsible for implementing this regulation.First was the Energy and Mineral Resources Services (Dinas ESDM) as the main sector. The Innovative and Regional Landscaping Services (DinasCiptakaryadan Tata Ruang) was second agency responsible for garbage management.Third organization was Bio-Environment Office (BLH) with responsibility for environment preservation. Based on data analysis with policy theory which applied Friedrich?s institutional model, it was found that governmental response for implementing regulationon new-renewable energy was only for the sake of formality. Problems were still existing, such as lack of coordination across institutions, prominence of ego-sectoral mindset, low competency of human resource, limited budget for implementing the program, low response to community problem, and low performance of government officers.


  1. Gokcol, Cihan., et al. (2008) Importance of Biomass Energy as Alternative to OtherSources in Turkey. JournalEnergy Policy, Elsevier Science Ltd, GreatBritain [Internet], Vol. 37, pp. 424-431. Melalui: <http://www.sciencedirect.com> [Diakses 20 Mei 2012].
  2. Grindle, Merilee S (2007) Going Local: Decentralization, Democratization, and thePromise of Good Governance. United Kingdom, Princeton University Press.
  3. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2007) Good Practice Guidelines: BioenergyProject Development & Biomass Supply. France, Head of PublicationService.
  4. Jefferson, Michael (2000) World Energy Assessment: Energy and The Challenge ofSustainability, Chapter 12: Energy Policies for Sustainable Development.UNDP, New York.
  5. Kemenristek (2006) Indonesia 2005-2025: Buku Putih Penelitian, Pengembangandan Penerapan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Bidang Sumber Energi Baru dan Terbarukan untuk Mendukung Keamanan Ketersediaan Energi Tahun 2025. Jakarta, Kemenristek.
  6. Mega, Voula (2005) Sustainable Development, Energy and the City : a Civilization ofVisions and Actions. USA, Springer Science and Business Media, Inc.
  7. Muluk, M.R. Khoirul (2008) Knowledge Management: Kunci sukses InovasiPemerintahan Daerah. Malang, Bayumedia Publishing.
  8. Perda Kabupaten Malang Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 tentang Rencana PembangunanJangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) Kabupaten Malang Tahun 2010-2015
  9. Radetzki, Marian (1997) The Economics of Biomass in Industrialized Countries:an Overview. JournalEnergy Policy, Elsevier Science Ltd,Great Britain [Internet], Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 545-554. Melalui: <http://www.sciencedirect.com>[Diakses 20 Mei 2012].
  10. Sugiyono(2010)MetodePenelitianKuantitatif,Kualitatif,danR&D. CV. Alfabel .Bandung.

[Tri Kuswahyono. (2017); THE ANALYSIS ON POLICY ABOUT RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (May). 143-149] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


niswatin hasanah
brawijaya university

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4090      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4090