29May 2017

DISAPPEARING DAUGHTERS AND SON PREFERENCE IN INDIA ? ISSUES AND CHALLENGES IN THE PRESENT SCENARIO.

  • Christ University, Hosur Road, Bengaluru ? 560029.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Sex selection is a violation of law and unethical. But our patriarchal society continues to turn a blind eye towards it or offers excuses to justify its existence. Speaking at a conference of regional Health Ministers, the then Union Minister for Health, Mr. B. Shankaranand ?expressed deep concern? over the ?highly unethical, unjust and immoral? practice of using amniocentesis for sex determination (Ravindra, 1986). The practice of eliminating female foetuses is believed to be one of the main reasons for the adverse child sex ratio in the country. In this context, the present paper discusses the past and the present, the colonial encounter and efforts to eliminate this age old practice. Despite women?s increased presence in the public domain, better educational and work opportunities and changed mindset, women continue to experience physical and emotional violence both within and outside the household. Historically, the degradation of girls has been expressed in various ways. Violence against girls and women often takes the form of deprivation and neglect. But the dynamics of domestic violence can involve the control of women?s reproductive capacity as well. In abusive situation, a woman may be co-erced to abort the foetus if the foetus is female. In the South Asian context the inability to produce a male heir may result in humiliation, contempt, abuse and abandonment. Modernization and Westernization has not resulted in any change in the situation. The spread of ultrasound as well as ameniocentism for sex determination are playing a vital role in female foetus induced abortions referred to as high-tech-sexism by Amartya Sen (1990).


  1. Agarwal, Bina 1988: Who sows? Who reaps? Women and land rights in India. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies 15,4: 531-581.
  2. Agnihotri, S.B. 2000. Sex Ratio Patterns in the Indian Population: A Fresh Exploration. New Delhi: Sage.
  3. Agnihotri, S.B. 2003. ?Survival of the Girl Child: Tunneling out of the Chakravyuha.? Economic and Political Weekly October 11: 4351-560.
  4. Amartya Sen, ?More Than 100 Million Women Are Missing,? New York Review of Books, December 20, 1990.
  5. Arnold, F., M. Kim Choe, and T.K. Roy. 1998. ?Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India.? Population Studies 523: 301-15.
  6. Basu, A.M. 1999. ?Fertility Decline and Increasing Gender Imbalance in India, Including a Possible South-Indian Turnaround.? Development and Change 302: 237-63.
  7. Basu, A.M. 2000. ?Fertility Decline and Worsening Gender Bias in India: A response to S. Irudaya Rajan et al.? Development and Change 31: 1093-95.
  8. Berreman, G. 1993. ?Sanskritization as female oppression in India.? In Sex and gender hierarchies, edited by Barbara Diane Miller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Billig, M.S. 1992. ?The Marriage Squeeze and the Rise of Groomprice in India's Kerala State.? Journal of Comparative Family Studies 232:197-216.
  10. Blaffer Hrdy, S. 1999. Mother Nature: a History of Mothers, Infants, and Natural Selection. New York: Pantheon Books (Random House).
  11. Bloch, F., V. Rao, and S. Desai. 2004. "Wedding Celebrations as Conspicuous Consumption: Signaling Social Status in Rural India." Journal of Human Resources 39(3): 675-95.
  12. Caldwell, John C.; Reddy, P. Hemachandra; Caldwell, Pat 1982: The causes of demographic change in rural South India: A micro approach. In: Population and Development Review 4,4: 689-727 [doi: 10.2307/1972469].
  13. Dahlburg, (1994), ?Where Killing Baby Girls ?is no big sin?,? The Los Angeles Times, In The Toronto Star, (February 28).
  14. Das Gupta, M. 2005. ?Explaining Asia's ?Missing Women?: A New Look at the Data.? Population and Development Review 31(3): 529-35.
  15. Debarati Sen (2010). Female Foeticide, Infanticide and Child Murder: An Insight into the status of Women in India: Women in India-Problems Potentialities and Power, Mitram, Kolkata.
  16. Diamond-Smith, Nadia; Luke, Nancy; McGarvey, Stephen 2008: ?Too many girls, too much dowry?: Son preference and daughter aversion in rural Tamil Nadu, India. In: Culture, Health & Sexuality 10,7: 697-708
  17. Dyson, T. & Moore, M. (1983) On kinship structure, female autonomy and demographic behaviour in India, Population and Development Review, 9, pp. 35?60.
  18. Dyson, T. and M. Moore. 1983. ?On kinship structure, female autonomy and demographic behavior in India.? Population and Development Review 91: 35?60.
  19. Government of India 2011: Census of India 2011.
  20. Miller, B. 1981; The Endangered Sex: Neglect of Female Children in Rural North India. Ithaca, NY. Cornell Univ. Press p. 139.
  21. Nanda, Bijayalaxmi Sex selective abortion: A syncretic feminist approach. Mainstream, 53(1), 2014(27 Dec): p.83-87.
  22. Nauck, B. (2001). Del' Wert von Kindern ftir ihre Eltern: "Value of children" als spezielle Handlungstheorie des generativen Verhaltens und von Generationenbeziehungen im interkulturellen Vergleich [The value of children for their parents: A special action theory of fertility behavior and intergenerational relationships in cross-cultural comparison]. Kdlner Zeitschrijt fiir Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 53, 407-435.
  23. Oldenburg, V.T. (2003). Dowry Murder: The Imperial Origins of a Cultural Crime. Oxford University Press: New Delhi.
  24. Patel, V (2002). Adverse Juvenile Sex Ratio in Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly. 37(22), 2124-2125.
  25. Patel, V.?2003. ?The Girl Child: Health Status?in the Post Independence Period?, The National?Medical Journal of India, AIIMS- Delhi, Vol.16, Supplement 2, pp. 42-45
  26. Rao, Vijayendra 1993: The rising price of husbands: A hedonic analysis of dowry increases in rural India. In: Journal of Political Economy 101,4: 666-677.
  27. Ravindra R.P (1986). ?Sex Determination? : The Scarcer Half ? A report on amniocentesis and Other Sex-determination techniques, Sex preselection and new reproductive technologies, Centre for Education and Documentation, Bombay.
  28. Reserve Bank of India 2012: Handbook of Statistics on the Indian Economics. Mumbai: India Printing Works.
  29. Sen, A.K. 2003. "Missing Women Revisited." British Medical Journal 327(7427): 1297-98.
  30. Singh, J. P. 2005: The contemporary Indian family. In: Adams, Bernd N.; Trost, Jan (Eds.): Handbook of world families. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications: 129-166
  31. Srinivas, M. N. (1962).Caste in India and other essays. Bombay, India: Asia Publishing House.
  32. Srinivas, M. N. The Cohesive Role of Sanskritization and Other Essays. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  33. The Economist 2012 [URL: hhtp://www.economist.com/content/indian-summary, 30. April 2014].
  34. Vishwanath.L.S(1999). Use of Sacred Texts-Generation of Knowledge and effort of the Colonial State of Suppress Female Infanticide in India, The Resources of History-Tradition, Narration and Nation in South Asia, ?cole fran?aise d'Extr?me ? Orient Institute fran?aise de, Pondicherry.

[Pritha Dasgupta. (2017); DISAPPEARING DAUGHTERS AND SON PREFERENCE IN INDIA ? ISSUES AND CHALLENGES IN THE PRESENT SCENARIO. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (May). 1741-1748] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Dr. Pritha Dasgupta
Christ University

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4304      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4304