MAIN CONSIDERATIONS AND CURRENT TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES ON THE CAD / CAM SYSTEM: A BRIEF REVIEW.

  • University Center North Paulista (Unorp) - S?o Jos? do Rio Preto ? SP, Brazil.
  • Post graduate and continuing education (Unipos), Street Ipiranga, 3460, S?o Jos? do Rio Preto SP, Brazil 15020-040.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • How to Cite This Article
  • Corresponding Author

Introduction: The CAD / CAM system was introduced in dentistry with the purpose of promoting the manufacture of prostheses based on a three-dimensional system of last generation. The CAD / CAM system consists of the intraoral scanner or the plaster model such as CAD, while the CAM is the milling machine. One of the main objectives of this technology is the simplification and optimization in the production of prosthetic structures, aiming at the production of structures with a high standard of quality and aesthetics, in a personalized and planned way with digital precision. Objective: to present the main benefits of the CAD / CAM system for the creation of dental prostheses, making a historical search and show its importance in contemporary dentistry. Methods: Experimental and clinical studies were included (case reports, retrospective, prospective and randomized trials) with qualitative and / or quantitative analysis. The words were included \\\"Dental Prostheses\\\" and \\\"CAD / CAM system\\\". Conclusion: Technological evolution has transformed something considered to be handcrafted in an automated, exact production with superior quality level, reducing the time of product preparation, eliminating costs of steps, extinguishing manual errors, thus allowing a better job, where To work with extremely durable materials.


  1. Spies BC, Pieralli S, Vach K, Kohal R-J. CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic implant-supported single crowns made from lithium disilicate: Final results of a 5-year prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 00:1?8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12508.
  2. Sheridan RR,Verrett R,?Haney S,?Schoolfield J. Effect of Split-File Digital Workflow on Crown Margin Adaptation. J Prosthodont.?2017 Jun 9. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12606.
  3. Christensen GJ: In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations: the
  4. future? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:83-85
  5. Christensen GJ: In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations: the
  6. future? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:83-85
  7. Christensen GJ: In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations: the
  8. future? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:83-85
  9. Christensen GJ: In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations: the
  10. future? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:83-85
  11. Christensen GJ: In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations: the future? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:83-85.
  12. Trost L, Stines S, Burt L: Making informed decisions about incorporating a CAD/CAM system into dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:32S-36S.
  13. Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, et al: Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:770-777.
  14. Tamac E, Toksavul S, Toman M: Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:909-913.
  15. Euan R: Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: Influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design. J Prosthet Dent 2014;16:1-8.
  16. Buchi DL, Ebler S, H ? ammerle CHF, et al: Marginal and internal ? fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study. Quintessence Int 2014;45:837-846.
  17. Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, et al: 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthodont 2014;23:610-617.
  18. Patzelt SB, Spies BC, Kohal RJ. CAD/CAM-fabricated implantsupported restorations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(suppl 11):77?85.
  19. Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012;28:3?12.
  20. Guess PC, Zavanelli RA, Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Thompson VP. Monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate versus veneered YTzp crowns: comparison of failure modes and reliability after fatigue. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23:434?442.
  21. Cooper LF, Stanford C, Feine J, McGuire M. Prospective assessment of CAD/CAM zirconia abutment and lithium disilicate crown restorations: 2.4 year results. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:33?39.
  22. Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2016;32: 275?283.

Andressa Rocha Codogno, Amanda Rocha, Mailton Neves de Oliveira, Idiberto Jos? Zotarelli Filho and Vanda Rieko Fujita Myazaki (2017); MAIN CONSIDERATIONS AND CURRENT TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES ON THE CAD / CAM SYSTEM: A BRIEF REVIEW., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 5 (08), 1692-1695, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5232


Idiberto José
Unipos

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5232      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5232