Vol. 5 (10) pp. 1061-1068 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5626

EFFECTS OF FRUIT DRINKS ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE MATERIALS.

, , , and
  • Associate Professor; Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • Bio-medical Engineer Researcher, Dental Biomaterials Research Chair, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • Dental Interns, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • Professor; Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
17 Downloads 106 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Aim: This study evaluated the effect of two fruit drinks on surface roughness of two esthetic restorative materials. One resin-composite, one resin-modified-glass-ionomer and two fruit drinks (orange and cocktail) were used in this study. Methods: Specimens (n=20) of each material were fabricated against Mylar strip and surface roughness was recorded using noncontact surface profilometer. Each specimen was placed in the tested fruit drinks for 24 hours and then surface roughness was recorded. Results: Surface roughness (mean+SD) of resin-composite before/after immersion in orange and cocktail were 0.04+0.02, 0.12+0.05, 0.06+0.03, and 0.11+0.06. For resin-modified-glass-ionomer were 0.72+0.14, 0.60+0.19, 0.56+0.11, and 0.52+0.15. For resin-composite there was significant difference between surface roughness before/after immersion in orange and cocktail (P<0.05). For resin-modified-glass-ionomer, there was significant difference between surface roughness before/after immersion in orange (P<0.05). Conclusion: The surface roughness of the resin-composite and resin-modified-glass-ionomer examined showed a significant change in the surface roughness after immersion for 24 hours in the tested fruit drinks.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Banan LK, Hegde AM. Plaque and salivary pH changes after consumption of fresh fruit juices. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005; 30: 9-13.
  2. Inukai J,Nakagaki H,?Itoh M, Tsunekawa M,?Watanabe K. Recent trends in sugar content and pH in contemporary soft?drinks. J Dent?Child?(Chic) 2011; 78: 138-42.
  3. AL-Hussyeen A. Types of snacks and drinks available in female primary schools in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in relation to the dental health of children. J Pakistan Dent Assoc 2004; 13: 13-7.
  4. Rahim TN,?Mohamad D,Md Akil H,?Ab Rahman I. Water sorption characteristics of?restorative?dental composites immersed in acidic?drinks. Dent Mater?2012; 28: e63-70.
  5. Yap AUJ, Tan SHL, Wee SSC, Lee CW,Lim EL,?Zeng KY. Chemical degradation of composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 1015-21.
  6. Hamouda IM. Effects of various beverages on hardness,?roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent2011; 23: 315-22.
  7. Ferracane JL. Resin composite ? state of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29-38.
  8. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass?ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 129-38.
  9. Kawai K, Urano M. Adherence of plaque components to different restorative materials. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 396-400.
  10. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-69.
  11. Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, Pfister W. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 278-85.
  12. Rimondini L, Far? S, Brambilla E, Felloni A, Consonni C, Brossa F, et al. The effect of surface roughness on early in vivo plaque colonization on titanium. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 556-62.
  13. AAPD Reference Manual - American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Policy on Vending Machines in Schools, Council on Clinical Affairs, Oral Health Policies. Pediatr Dent 2013-2014; 34(7 Suppl): 59-60.
  14. Wan Bakar W, McIntyre J. Susceptibility of selected tooth-coloured dental materials to damage by common erosive acids. Aust Dent J 2008; 53: 226-34.
  15. Maliderou M, Reeves S, Nobel C. The effect of social demographic factors, snack consumption, and vending machine use on oral health of children living in London. Br Dent J 2006; 201: 441-44; discussion 437; quiz 466.
  16. Ionescu A, Wutscher E, Brambilla E, Schneider-Feyrer S, Giessibl FJ, Hahnel S. Influence of surface properties of resin-based composites on in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm development. Eur J Oral Sci 2012; 120: 458-65.
  17. Mei L, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Ren Y. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 770-78.
  18. Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2011; 39(Suppl 1): e9-17.
  19. Bashetty H, Joshi S. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13: 34-8.
  20. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1382-90.
  21. Carlen A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, Holmberg K, Olsson J. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 481-87.
  22. Ozg?naltay G, Yazici AR, G?r?c? J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 218-24.
  23. de Oliveira AL, Domingos PA, Palma-Dibb RG, Garcia PP. Chemical and morphological features of nanofilled composite resin: influence of finishing and polishing procedures and fluoride solutions. Microsc Res Tech 2011; 75: 212-19.
  24. G?rgan S, ?nen A, K?pr?l? H. In vitro effects of alcohol containing and alcohol-free mouth rinses on microhardness of some restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 244-46.
  25. Karan S, Toroglu MS. Porcelain refinishing with two different polishing systems after orthodontic debonding. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 947-53.
  26. Winchester L. Direct orthodontic bonding to porcelain: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1991; 18: 299-308.
  27. Tholt de Vasconcellos B, Miranda-J?nior WG, Prioli R, Thompson J, Oda M. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 442-49.
  28. Mante MO, Saleh N, Tanna NK, Mante FK. Softening patterns of light cured glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 303-09.
  29. Correr GM, Bruschi Alonso RC, Baratto-Filho F, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA, Puppin-Rontani RM. In vitro long-term degradation of aesthetic restorative materials in food-simulating media. Acta Odontol Scand 2012; 70: 101-08.
  30. Eliades T, Bourauel C. Intraoral aging of orthodontic materials: the picture we miss and its clinical relevance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 403-12.

How to Cite This Article

Faika Y. Abdelmegid, Mohamed A. El-sharawy, Mohammad M. Al-Jameel, Talal T. Al-rasheed and Fouad S. Salama. (2017); EFFECTS OF FRUIT DRINKS ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE MATERIALS., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 5 (10), 1061-1068, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5626

Corresponding Author

Fouad Salama
College of Dentistry, King Saud University
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.