29Oct 2017

INFLUENCE OF SPEED ON MICROCRACKS IN ROOT DENTIN DURING ROOT CANAL PREPARATION WITH TWO ROTARY SYSTEM-PROTAPER UNIVERSAL AND REVO-S.

Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to observe the influence of speed on cracks in root dentin using the ProTaper system and Revo S system at low, medium and high speed. Method: 36 mandibular premolar teeth that had been extracted for different reasons were selected. The teeth were decoronated and were divided into two groups-Group 1-ProTaper system (n-18) and Group 2-RevoS system (n-18). In group 1, 6 roots were shaped at 250rpm, 6 roots were shaped at 300rpm and 6 roots were shaped at 350rpm. Similar procedure was followed for group 2 at 250, 300,350rpm. After root canal procedure, all roots were sectioned horizontally at 3, 6,9mm from apex and were examined under stereomicroscope for presence of cracks. A Z test was used for data analysis. The significant level was set at P<0.05. Results: At 350rpm more percentage of microcracks were observed for both groups when compared to speed at 250 and 300rpm and at 300rpm both systems showed less incidence of cracks. RevoS system showed fewer incidences of cracks at high speed when compared to ProTaper system. Conclusion: In this in vitro study, instrumentation of root canals with RevoS at high speed made teeth less susceptible to cracks when compared to ProTaper system and 300rpm seems to be reasonable speed to use both these rotary files for cleaning and shaping in vivo with fewer incidence of cracks.

  1. Peters O. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems:a review. J Endod 2004;30:559?67.
  2. Adorno CG, Yoshioka T, Suda H. The effect of working length and root canal preparation technique on crack development in the apical root canal wall. IntEndod J2010;43:321?7.
  3. Sch?afer E, Lau R. Comparison of cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals with nickel-titanium and stainless-steel instruments. J Endod 1999;25:427?30.
  4. Vaudt J, Bitter K, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments. IntEndod J 2009;42:22?33.
  5. Ashwinkumar V, Krithikadatta J, Surendran S, Velmurugan N. Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: an SEM study. IntEndod J 2013;47:622?7.
  6. Bier CA, Shemesh H, Tanomaru-Filho M, et al. The ability of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation. J Endod 2009;35:236?8.
  7. Liu R, Hou BX, Wesselink PR, et al. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system. J Endod 2013;39:1054?6.
  8. Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, et al. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. J Endod 2012;38:232?5.
  9. Lam P, Palamara J, Messer H. Fracture strength of tooth roots following canal preparationby hand and rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2005;31:529?32.
  10. Rahman H et al.In vitro evaluation of dentinal microcrack formation during rootcanal preparations by different IJRD 2014;2:43-47
  11. ShervinBagherie, Mohammad Mehdi Bahrani, MiladSaffaripour.Comparative study of vertical root fracture resistance of mandibular incisors and molars following canal preparation with hand K files and RevoSrotory system.
  12. J. Dent. Sci. 2016; 3(5):133-136ProTaperUniversal_Brochure_enCatalogue_micromegaHakanArslan et al.Effect of ProTaperUniversal,Endoflare,Revo-S,HyFlex coronal flaring instruments and Gates Glidden Drills on crack formation.JOE 2014;40(10):1681-1683
  13. Grossman?s Endodntic Practice,12th editionCohen?s pathways of pulp.Asim Dane et al.Effect of different torque settings on crack formation in root dentin.JOE 2016;42(2):304-306
  14. OguzYoldas et al.Dentinalmicrocrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTiRotory instruments and the self adjustingfile.JOE 2012;38(2):232-235
  15. PratikMavani et al.Comparative evaluation of root microcracks by different rotory and reciprocationg endodontic file systems.IOSR-JDMS 2015;9(2):18-22
  16. N.Tulasi Priyaetal.?Dentinalmicrocracks after root canal preparation?.A comparative evaluation with hand,rotory and reciprocating instrumentation.JCDR 2014;8(12):70-72
  17. Deepa Deepak Shoray et al.Steriomicroscopic evaluation of dentinal defects induced by new rotory system:?ProTaper NEXT?.JCD 2015;18(3):210-213
  18. Fuss Z, Lustig J, Tamse A. Prevalence of vertical root fractures in extracted endodontically treated teeth. IntEndod J. 1999;32(4):283-6.
  19. Shemesh H, Bier CA, Wu MK, Tanomaru-Filho M, Wesselink PR. The effects of canal preparation and filling on the incidence of dentinal defects. IntEndod J. 2009;42(3):208-13.
  20. Bier CA, Shemesh H, Tanomaru-Filho M, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The ability of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation. J Endod. 2009;35(2):236-8
  21. Barbakow F, Lutz F (1997) The Lightspeed preparation techniqueevaluated by Swiss clinicians after attending continuing education courses.International Endodontic Journa46?50
  22. Camps JJ, Pertot WJ (1995) Torsional and stiffness properties of stainless steel and nickel?titanium endodontic files.Journal of Endodontics28, 239?43.
  23. Dietz DB, Di Fiore PM, Bahcall JK, Lautenschlager EP (1998) The effect of rotational speed on the breakage of nickel?titaniumrotaryfiles.Journal of Endodontics24, 273 (abstract)
  24. Milani AS, Froughreyhani M, Rahimi S, JafarabadiMA, Paksefat S; The effect of root canal preparation on the development of dentin cracks.IranEndod J 2012; 7(4): 177-82.
  25. Pasqualini D, Scotti N, Tamagnone L, Ellena F, Berutti E. Hand-operated and rotary ProTaper instruments: a comparison of working time and number of rotations in simulated root canals.J Endod 2008;34:314?7
  26. Park SY, Cheung GS, Yum J, Hur B, Park JK, Kim HC. Dynamic torsional resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2010;36:1200?4.
  27. Arun Paul et al.Steriomicroscopic evaluation of dentinal damage caused by Kfiles,Potaperuniversal,Neoniti A1,and Irace files-an in vitro study.ijar 2017;5(3):1719-1725.

[Remya Elizabeth Mathew, S.Vidhyadhara Shetty and Harish Shetty. (2017); INFLUENCE OF SPEED ON MICROCRACKS IN ROOT DENTIN DURING ROOT CANAL PREPARATION WITH TWO ROTARY SYSTEM-PROTAPER UNIVERSAL AND REVO-S. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Oct). 1889-1894] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Dr Remya Elizabeth Mathew
Post Graduate Student,Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics,Yenepoya Dental College,Mangalore

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5716      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5716

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 21 | No. of Views: 84