29Nov 2017

MINI-IMPLANT- VERSUS CONVENTIONAL IMPLANT-RETAINED MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURE IN COMPLETELY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

  • Assistant Researcher, Department Of Fixed And Removable Prosthodontics, National Research Center, Egypt.
  • PhD Candidate Prosthodontics, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Cairo University, Egypt.
  • Lecturer of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ibb University, Yemen.
  • Head of Department Of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Cairo University, Egypt.
  • Assistant Professor at Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Cairo University, Egypt.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mini implant versus conventional implant mandibular overdenture on patients? satisfaction and survival and success rates. Material and methods: A comprehensive electronic searching in PubMed and Cochrane databases up to March 2017 with language restriction to English only. We include randomized controlled trials compare between mini implant versus conventional implant regarding patient?s satisfaction, survival rate, marginal bone loss and complications. In addition, a manual searching was performed for related journals from January 2013 to March 2017. A meta-analysis was performed on all included studies by using a random effect model [mean, 95% confidence intervals (CI)] to pool the effect size as a heterogeneity between studies was high (P < 0.0001 and I? = 88%). Result: Primary screening and manual searching result in 124 articles from which only 5 articles compatible with our inclusion criteria. No statistically significance was found between mini implant versus conventional implant mandibular overdenture regarding patient satisfaction, survival rate, marginal bone loss and fracture incidence (confidence interval CI=95 and p=0.39). Conclusion: There is no strong evidence to reveal that mini implant could be used in the same degree as conventional dental implant however mini dental implant could be used as an alternating choice to conventional dental implant.

  1. Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B., & Br?nemark, P. I. (1981). A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral Surgery, 10(6), 387?416.
  2. Aparecido, C., Lemos, A., Verri, F. R., Eduardo, V., Batista, D. S., Ferreira, J., ? Pellizzer, E. P. (2016). Overdenture prosthesis retained by mini dental implants: A systematic review. Journal of Dentistry.
  3. Aunmeungtong, W., Kumchai, T., Strietzel, F. P., Reichart, P. A., & Khongkhunthian, P. (2016). Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 1?13.
  4. Bidra, A. S., & Almas, K. (2013). Mini implants for definitive prosthodontic treatment: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 109(3), 156?164.
  5. Burns, D. R. (2000). Mandibular implant overdenture treatment: consensus and controversy. Journal of Prosthodontics : Official Journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 9(1), 37?46.
  6. de Souza, R. F., Ribeiro, A. B., Della Vecchia, M. P., Costa, L., Cunha, T. R., Reis, A. C., & Albuquerque, R. F. (2015). Mini vs. Standard Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Trial. Journal of Dental Research, 94(10), 1376?84.
  7. Doundoulakis, J. H., Eckert, S. E., Lindquist, C. C., & Jeffcoat, M. K. (2003). The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 134(11), 1455?8.
  8. Feine JS, Carlsson GE , Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, G. S. et al. (2002). . The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant-overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17:601-2.
  9. Fitzpatrick BT. (2006). Standard of care for the edentulous mandible: a systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, (95:71?8).
  10. Ghelfan, O., & Chaushu, D. M. D. G. (2011). Implant-Supported Partial Restorations, 26(5).
  11. Higgins, J. P. T., & Altman, D. G. (2011). Higgins 2011 Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
  12. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Sytematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. [Updated March 2011]. www.cochrane-h. (n.d.).
  13. Jawad, S., Barclay, C., Whittaker, W., Tickle, M., & Walsh, T. (2017). A pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating mini and conventional implant retained dentures on the function and quality of life of patients with an edentulous mandible. BMC Oral Health, 17(1), 53.
  14. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Grp, P. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (Reprinted from Annals of Internal Medicine). Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873?880.
  15. Mostafa Omran 1, Alaa Abdelhamid 2, Amr Elkarargy 2, M. S. 3. (2013). Mini-Implant Overdenture Versus Conventional Implant Overdenture (A Radiographic and Clinical Assessments) Mostafa, 9(9), 89?97.
  16. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5- year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a man- dibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satis- faction. J Oral Rehabi. (n.d.).
  17. Preoteasa, E., Imre, M., & Preoteasa, C. T. (2014). A 3-year follow-up study of overdentures retained by mini-dental implants. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 29(5), 1170?6.
  18. Preoteasa, E., Meleşcanu-Imre, M., Preoteasa, C. T., Marin, M., & Lerner, H. (2010). Aspects of oral morphology as decision factors in mini-implant supported overdenture. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology = Revue Roumaine de Morphologie et Embryologie, 51(2), 309?14.
  19. Ribeiro, A. B., Della Vecchia, M. P., Cunha, T. R., Sorgini, D. B., dos Reis, A. C., Muglia, V. A., ? de Souza, R. F. (2015). Short-term post-operative pain and discomfort following insertion of mini-implants for retaining mandibular overdentures: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 42(8), 605?614.

[Marwa Hassan Mostafa, Ali Abdulghani AlSourori, Amal Fathy Kaddah and Ahmed Emad Fayyed. (2017); MINI-IMPLANT- VERSUS CONVENTIONAL IMPLANT-RETAINED MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURE IN COMPLETELY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Nov). 992-1002] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

marwa hassan mostafa
assisstant researcher at national research center and PhD candidate at faculty of oral and dental medicine Cairo university

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5858      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5858

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 12 | No. of Views: 78