15Nov 2017

STUDY THE EFFECT OF ASPECT RATIO AND INLET CONFIGURATIONS ON THE HYDRAULIC OF BOX CULVERT UNDER INLET CONTROL.

  • Assistant Professor of Hydraulic Structures, Building and Construction Engineering Dept., University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Assistant Professor of Water Resources, Building and Construction Engineering Dept. University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • MSc. Student, Building and Construction Engineering Dept., University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The feature and configuration of culvert entrance beside the aspect ratio (span/rise) have a key role in determining the hydraulic performance of culver. The conveyance along with the permitted height of head water can be determined mainly by the effect of the entrance factors on it. The present study aim to investigate the entrance feature and configuration on the hydraulic performance of culvert operated at inlet control for both unsubmerged and submerged entrance. Different aspect ratios with just head wall of square edges entrance have been tested experimentally by a wide range conditions to perform both unsubmerged and submerged flow. However, a new shape of inlet transition structure that proposed by Howes et al., 2010 have been adopted as the inlet approach to achieve a gradual contraction of stream lines before entrance. The results showed that improvement in performance through adoption of the actual measurements of contraction coefficients which leads to extract a new practical equations and design charts. However, the traditional limitations of the zone between unsubmerged and submerged flow at the entrance were developed through using a new shape of the inlet transition as the approach section to square edges entrance.


  1. Dasika ?New Approach to Design of Culverts? Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, (ASCE), 121(3), 1995, pp. 261-264; DOI:10.1061/(ASCE) 0733-9437(1995) 121.3A3 (261).
  2. A. Chin ?Hydraulic Analysis and Design of Pipe Culvert: USGS versus FHWA? Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 139(8), 2013, pp. 886-893; DOI:10.1061(ASCE) HY.1943-7900.0000748.
  3. H. Yoo and S. Lee ?Direct Determination of the Width or the Height for a Box Culvert Applying Dimensionless Equations? KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(7), 2012, pp. 1302-1307; DOI:10.1007/S12205-012-1695-1.
  4. J. Howes, C.M. Burt and B.F. Sanders ?Subcritical Contraction for Improved Open Channel Flow Management Accuracy with an Upward looking ADVM? Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 136(9), 2010, pp. 617-626; DOI:10.1061/(ASCE) IR.1943-4774.0000224.
  5. L. Bodhaine ?Measurement of Peak Discharge at Culverts by Indirect Method-Chapter A3? Techniques of Water Resources Investigations of the USGS, Fifth Print, 1988.
  6. D. Schall, R.L. Thompson, S.M. Zerges, R.T. Kilgore and J.L. Morris ?Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts? 3rd ed., HDS5, FHWA, 2012.
  7. G. Straub, A.G. Anderson and C.E. Bowers ?Importance of Inlet Design on Culvert Capacity? Technical Paper No.13, Series B, SAFHL, University of Minnesota, 1953.
  8. J. Charbeneau, A.D. Henderson and L.C. Sherman ?Hydraulic Performance Curves for Highway Culverts? Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 132(5), 2006, pp. 474-481; DOI:10.1061/(ASCE) 0733-9429 (2006) 132:5 (474).

[Jaafar S. Maatooq, Hassan A. Omran and Mayssam M. Taha. (2017); STUDY THE EFFECT OF ASPECT RATIO AND INLET CONFIGURATIONS ON THE HYDRAULIC OF BOX CULVERT UNDER INLET CONTROL. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Nov). 519-526] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Jaafar S. Maatooq
University of Technology-Baghdad

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5797      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5797