12Dec 2017

THE BIOLOGICAL COMPLICATION OF IMPLANT ABUTMENT MATERIALS.

  • Lecture, Department of fixed prosthodontics, faculty of dentistry, Beni-suef University, Eygpt.
  • Lecture, Department of fixed prosthodontics, faculty of dentistry, MSA University, Eygpt.
  • Professor, Department of fixed prosthodontics, faculty of dentistry, Cairo University, Eypt.
  • Lecture, Department of fixed prosthodontics, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Hodeidah University, Yemen.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Objectives: The goal of this review was to identify the biological complication of implant abutment materials in relative to alveolar bone around implant supported superstructure. Methodology: An electronic database search and further a manual searching was directed to detect RCTs, and cohort studies that give evidence about different abutment materials complication. Pocket depth, amount of rescission and crestal bone loss were attributed to alveolar bone loss. Results: fourteen clinical studies were detected from an initial search of 107 studies and the extraction of the analyzing data were tabled according to complication output. Pocket probing depth were documented in eight studies, PPD around Zirconium implant abutments was 3.2 mm versus 3.4 mm for Titanium abutment. Five studies examined the recession index for Zirconium and Titanium implant abutments. The RI ranged from 0 to 0.4 at Titanium implant abutments and 0 to 0.3 at Zirconium implant abutments. For the alveolar loss around Zirconia implant abutment was stated to differ from 0.2-1.48 and 0.3- 1.43mm at Titanium abutments. Conclusion: The data reported in this systematic review did not give an evidence for the complication regarding all ceramic versus metallic implant abutment. However, it can be concluded that the assessment of the randomized clinical trials did not provide an absolute decision for the choice of ceramic or metallic as implant abutment material relative to alveolar bone response. The meta-analysis presented a statistically significant difference between abutment material with superiority for the all ceramic abutments over metallic abutment providing a favorable response of Marginal Bone Loss, but with non- statistically significant regarding Pocket Probing Depth (PPD) and Recession Index of soft tissue (RI)

  1. Siddiqi A, Kieser JA, De Silva RK, Th0mson WM, Duncan WJ. Soft and hard tissue response to zirconia versus titanium one-piece implants placed in alveolar and palatal sites: a randomized control trial. Clin Implant Dent Related Res 2015;17:483-96.
  2. Payer, M., Heschl, A., Koller, M., Arnetzl, G., Lorenzoni, M. & Jakse, N. All-ceramic restoration of zirconia two-piece implants ? a randomized controlled clinical trial. Cl. Oral Impl.Res (2015). 26:371?376.
  3. Jung, R.E., Holderegger, C., Sailer, I., Khraisat, A., Suter, A. & Hammerle, C.H. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int. J. of Pe. & Rest. Dent. (2008) 28: 357?365.
  4. Belser, U.C., Schmid, B., Higginbottom, F. & Buser, D. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: a review of the recent literature. Int. J. of Oral & Max. Implants (2004) 19: 30?42.
  5. Anders Ekfeldt, F?rst B, Carlsson GE. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Nov;22(11):1308-14.
  6. Glauser, R., Sailer, I., Wohlwend, A., Studer, S., Schibli, M. & Scharer, P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported singletooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. The Int. Jour. of Prosth. (2004) 17: 285?290
  7. Canullo, L. Clinical outcome study of customized zirconia abutments for single-implant restorations. Internat. Jour. of Prosth.(2007) 20: 489?493.
  8. Andersson B1, Taylor A, Lang BR, Scheller H, Sch?rer P, Sorensen JA, Tarnow D Alumina ceramic implant abutments used for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 1- to 3-year multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Sep-Oct;14(5):432-8.
  9. Park, S.E., Da Silva, J.D., Weber, H.P. & Ishikawa-Nagai, S. Optical phenomenon of periimplant soft tissue. Part I. Spectrophotometric assessment of natural tooth gingiva and periimplant mucosa. Cl.Oral Impl.Res. (2007) 18: 569?574.
  10. Lops, D., Bressan, E., Chiapasco, M., Rossi, A. & Romeo, E. (2013) Zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implant prostheses after 5 years of function in posterior regions. Int.Jour. of Oral & Max. Implants 28: 281?287.
  11. Zembic, A., Bosch, A., Jung, R.E., Hammerle, C.H. & Sailer, I. (2013) Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions. Cl.Oral Impl. Res. 24: 384?390.
  12. de Alboroz, C.A., Vignoletti, F., Ferrantino, L., Cardenas, E., De, S.M. & Sanz, M. (2014) A randomized trial on the aesthetic outcomes of implant-supported restorations with zirconia or titanium abutments. Jour.of Clin. Period. 41: 1161?1169.
  13. Follmann D, Elliott P, Suh I, Cutler J. Variance imputation for overviews of clinical trials with continuous response. Jour.of Clin. Epid. 1992;45(7):769?73.
  14. Lops, D., Bressan, E., Parpaiola, A., Luca, S., Cecchinato, D. & Romeo, E. Soft tissues stability of cad-cam and stock abutments in anterior regions: 2-year prospective multicentric cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Dec;26(12):1436-42.
  15. Nascimento C?ssio do, Murillo Sucena Pita, Emerson de Souza Santos, Nadia Monesi, Ricardo Faria Ribeiro Microbiome of titanium and zirconia dental implants abutments .Dental Materials, 32, 1, 2016, Pages 93-101
  16. Yogesh V, Jain V, Chauhan SS, Bharate V, Koli D, Kumar M. Influence of different forms and materials (zirconia or titanium) of abutments in peri-implant soft-tissue healing using matrix metalloproteinase-8: A randomized pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Oct;118(4):475-480
  17. Sailer, I., Zembic, A., Jung, R.E., Siegenthaler, D., Holderegger, C. & Hammerle, C.H. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Cl.Oral Impl.Res. (2009) 20: 219?225.
  18. Zembic, A., Sailer, I., Jung, R.E. & Hammerle, C.H. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results. Clin.Oral Impl. Res. (2009) 20: 802?808.
  19. Zembic, A., Philipp, A.O., Hammerle, C.H., Wohlwend, A. & Sailer, I. Eleven-year followup of a prospective study of zirconia implant abutments supporting single all-ceramic crowns in anterior and premolar regions. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e417-26. doi: 10.1111/cid.12263.
  20. Linkevicius, T. & Apse, P. Influence of abutment material on stability of peri-implant tissues: a systematic review. The Inter. Jour.of Oral & Maxill.Implants (2008) 23: 449?456.
  21. van Brakel, R., Noordmans, H.J., Frenken, J., de Roode, R., de Wit, G.C. & Cune, M.S. The effect of zirconia and titanium implant abutments on light reflection of the supporting soft tissues. Clin.Oral Impl. Res. (2011) 22: 1172?1178.
  22. Nothdurft, F.P., Fontana, D., Ruppenthal, S., May, A., Aktas, C., Mehraein, Y., Lipp, P. & Kaestner, L. (2014) Differential behavior of fibroblasts and epithelial cells on structured implant abutment materials: a comparison of materials and surface topographies. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1237-49.
  23. Hosseini, M., Worsaae, N., Schiodt, M. & Gotfredsen, K. A 1-year randomised controlled trial comparing zirconia versus metal-ceramic implant supported single-tooth restorations. Europ. Jour. of Oral Impl. (2011) 4: 347? 361.
  24. Hosseini, M., Worsaae, N., Schiodt, M. & Gotfredsen, K. A 3-year prospective study of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic materials in patients with tooth agenesis. Clin. Oral Impl. Research (2013) 24: 1078?1087.
  25. Gapski, R., Neugeboren, N., Pomeranz, A.Z. & Reissner, M.W. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: a clinical case report. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants (2008) 23: 943?946.
  26. Wilson, T.G., Jr. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. Journal of Periodontology (2009) 80: 1388?1392.
  27. Linkevicius, T., Vindasiute, E., Puisys, A. & Peciuliene, V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations. Clinical Oral Implants Research (2011) 22: 1379?1384.
  28. Balasubramaniam GR. Predictability of resin bonded bridges - a systematic review. Br Dent J. 2017 Jun 9;222(11):849-858.
  29. Mascarenhas F, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E, Clelland N, Seidt J. Load to failure of different zirconia implant abutments with titanium components. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jun;117(6):749-754.
  30. Ralph V, Cune MS, van Winkelhoff AJ, de Putter C, Verhoeven JW, van der Reijden W. Early bacterial colonization and soft tissue health around zirconia and titanium abutments: an in vivo study in man. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jun;22(6):571-7.
  31. Belser, U.C., Schmid, B., Higginbottom, F. & Buser, D. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: A review of the recent literature. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants (2004) 19 (Suppl.): 30?42.
  32. Buchi, D.L.E., Sailer, I., Fehmer, V., Hammerle, C.H.F. & Thoma, D.S. (2014) All-ceramic singletooth implant reconstructions using modified zirconia abutments: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial of the effect of pink veneering ceramic on the esthetic outcome. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 34: 29?37.
  33. Bra?gger, U., Karoussis, I., Persson, R., Pjetursson, B., Salvi, G. & Lang, N.P. (2005) Technical and biological complications/ failures with single crowns and fixed partial dentures in implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 326?334.
  34. De Boever, A.L., Keersmaekers, K., Vanmaele, G., Kerschbaum, T., Theuniers, G. & De Boever, J.A. (2006) Prosthetic complications in fixed endosseous implant-borne reconstructions after an observation period of at least 40 months. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 33: 833?839.
  35. Ekfeldt, A., Furst, B. & Carlsson, G.E. (2011) Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study. Clinical Oral Implant Research 22: 1308?1314.
  36. Nakamura, K., Kanno, T., Milleding, P. & Ortengren, U. Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. The International Journal of Prosthodontics(2010) 23: 299?309.
  37. Muche, R., Krausse, A. & Strub, J.R. Success rates of implant supported prostheses in partially edentulous patients ? part ii. Schweizerische Monatsschrift fu?r Zahnmedizin (2003) 113: 404?410.
  38. Passos, S.P., Linke, B., Larjava, H. & French, D. Performance of zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth crowns in esthetic areas: a retrospective study up to 12-year followup. Clinical Oral Implants Research, (2014) doi:10.1111/clr.12504.
  39. Pjetursson, B.E., Tan, K., Lang, N.P., Bra?gger, U., Egger, M. & Zwahlen, M. (2004) A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Int J Dent. 2012; Nov 4. doi:?10.1155/2012/876023
  40. Sailer, I., Philipp, A., Zembic, A., Pjetursson, B.E., Hammerle, C.H. & Zwahlen, M. (2009) A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2009(Suppl. 4): 4?31.
  41. Vigolo, P., Givani, A., Majzoub, Z. & Cordioli, G. A 4-year prospective study to assess periimplant hard and soft tissues adjacent to titanium versus gold-alloy abutments in cemented single implant crowns. Journal of Prosthodontics(2006) 15: 250?256.

[Mohamed M. Radwan, Mohamed A.Mokhtar, Gihan Elnagar and Maged Saleh, (2017); THE BIOLOGICAL COMPLICATION OF IMPLANT ABUTMENT MATERIALS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Dec). 445-455] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Mohamed mostafa radwan
Faculty of dentistry , Beni-suef university

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5978      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5978

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 16 | No. of Views: 94