08Mar 2018

TECHNOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF SUGARCANE VARIETIES ATTACKED BY DIATRAEA SACCHARALIS.

  • Undergrade student, in Agronomy, at Educational Foundation of Andradina, state of S?o Paulo, Brazil.
  • Lecture, in Agronomy, at Educational Foundation of Andradina, state of S?o Paulo, Brazil.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

An alternative to the control of sugarcane borer is the choice of the more resistant varieties that adapt themselves to different production systems, guarantying a better productivity. This work aimed to evaluate technological parameters of sugarcane varieties attacked by Diatraea saccharalis. The experiment was implemented in a randomized 2x9-factorial scheme, from 2 different cultivation cycles, 2016 and 2017, with 9 varieties of sugarcane: CTC-9001; CT04-6043; CTC-7; CTC-22; CTC-25; CTC-9003; RB97-5952; RB96-6928 e RB85-5453, with 4 repetitions, 36 plots in total. At the end each cultivation cycle (2016 and 2017), it was evaluated the following parameters: tons of sugarcane?s stem per hectare (TSH); percents of attacked stems (%AS); Pol percents in broth (%Pol); percents of sugarcane?s fiber (%Fiber); percents of purity in broth (%Purity); Brix value of broth (?Brix); and total-recoverable sugar per ton of sugarcane (TRS). The varieties CT046043 and CTC7 had lower values of fiber and higher incidence of borer. The presence of sugar cane drill reduced the quality and quantity of sugarcane stalks. The variation of 10% in fiber content in sugarcane caused a 71% difference in the incidence of Diatraea saccharalis.

  1. Aude, MIS. (1993): Est?gios de desenvolvimento da cana-de-a??car e suas rela??es com a produtividade. Ci?ncia Rural., 23 (2): 241-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84781993000200022
  2. Banzatto, DA. and Kronka, SN. (2013): Experimenta??o Agr?cola. 4.ed. Funep, 237p.
  3. Consecana - Conselho dos Produtores de Cana-de-A??car, A??car e Etanol do Estado de S?o Paulo. (2006): Manual de instru??es. 5. ed. Piracicaba:CONSECANA/publica??es.
  4. Costa, CTS., Ferreira, VM., Endres, L., Ferreira, DTRG. and Gon?alves, ER. (2011): Crescimento e produtividade de quatro variedades de cana-de-a??car no quarto ciclo de cultivo. Revista Caatinga., 24: 56-63.
  5. Daniel, JLP., Jacovaci, FA., Junges, D., Santos, MC., Lima, J.R., Anjos, IA., Landell, MGA., Huhtanen, P. and Nussio, LG. (2016): Fibre digestibility and its relationships with chemical and morphological traits in thirty-two sugarcane varieties. Grass and Forage Science., 72: 545?555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12254
  6. Dinardo-Miranda, LL. (2008): Pragas. In: Dinardomiranda, LL., Vasconcelos, ACM., Landell, M.G.A. (Ed.). Cana-de-a??car. Campinas: Instituto Agron?mico., pp.349-404.
  7. Ekp?likp?z?, OS., Dansi, A., Agbangla, C., Akoegninou, A. and Sanni, A. (2016): Biochemical Characterization of Sugarcane Varieties Cultivated in Benin. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 5 (2): 368-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.502.042
  8. Empresa Brasileira De Pesquisa Agropecu?ria - Embrapa. (2013): Sistema brasileiro de classifica??o de solos. 3.ed. Bras?lia., 353p.
  9. Lima, GSA., Cruz, MM., Lima, JS. and Tenorio, DA. S?ndrome do amarelecimento foliar da cana-de-a??car no estado de Alagoas. Ci?ncia Agr?cola., 9: 29-33.
  10. Medeiros, AH., Mingossi, FB., Dias, RO., Franco, FP., Vicentini, R., Mello, MO., Moura, DS. and Silva-Filho, MC. (2016): Sugarcane serine peptidase inhibitors, serine peptidases, and clp protease system subunits associated with sugarcane borer (Diatraea saccharalis) herbivory and wounding. International Journal of Molecular Sciences., 17: 2-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091444
  11. Raij, B., Cantarella, H., Quaggio, JA. and Furlani, AMC.?(1996): Recomenda??es de aduba??o e calagem para o Estado de S?o Paulo. 2.ed. Campinas: IAC., 285p.
  12. Ripoli, TCC., Ripoli, MLC. and Casagrandi, DV. (2006): Produ??o de cana-de-a??car: estado da arte. Piracicaba: Ed. dos autores., 2016p.
  13. Rodolfo Junior, F., Ribeiro Junior, WQ., Ramos, MLG., Rocha, OC., Batista, LMT. and Silva, FAM. (2016): Produtividade e qualidade de variedades de cana-de-a??car de terceira soca sob regime h?drico vari?vel. , 4 (1): 36-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.14583/2318-7670.v04n01a08
  14. Showler, AT. (2016): Selected abiotic and biotic environmental stress factors affecting two economically important sugarcane stalk boring pests in the United States. Agronomy., 6 (1): 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy6010010
  15. Silva, FAS. and Azevedo, CAV. (2016): The Assistat Software Version 7.7 and its use in the analysis of experimental data. African Journal Agriculture Resarch., 11 (39): 3733-3740. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11522
  16. Silva, MA., Gava, GJC., Caputo, MM., Pincelli, RP., Jeronimo, EM. and Cruz, JCS. (2007): Uso de reguladores de crescimento como potencializadores do perfilhamento e da produtividade em cana soca. Bragantia., 66 (4): 545-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052007000400003
  17. Silva, VSG., Oliveira, MW., Oliveira, TBA., Mantovanelli, BC., Silva, AC., Soares, ANR. and Clemente, PRA. (2017): Leaf area of sugarcane varieties and their correlation with biomass productivity in three cycles. African Journal of Agricultural Research., 12: 459-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11817
  18. Singh, P., Singh, M. and Sharma, B. (2016): Variation in sugar content between early and mid-late maturing sugarcane varieties across the crushing period in sub-tropical India. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists., 29: 1919-1922.
  19. Souza, FJM., Pascoaloto, IM., Figueiredo, PAM., Lima, CR. and Lisboa, LAM. (2016): Par?metros biom?tricos do crescimento e desenvolvimento da cana-de-a??car (Saccharum spp.) nas suas fases iniciais. Revista Mirante., 9 (1): 159-168.
  20. Souza, ZM., Paix?o, ACS., Prado, RM., Cesarin, LG. and Souza, SR. (2005): Manejo de palhada de cana colhida sem queima, produtividade do canavial e qualidade do caldo. Ci?ncia Rural., 35 (5): 1062-1068. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782005000500012
  21. Tyagi, AP. And Naidu, P. (2016): Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) variety evaluation for quantitative charac-ters (Pure obtainable cane sugar, sucrose content and cane yield). Journal of South Pacific Agriculture., 19 (1): 43-55. Zambrosi, FCB., Ribeiros, RV., Machado, EC. and Garcia, JC. (2017): Phosphorus deficiency impairs shoot regrowth of sugarcane varieties. Experimental?Agriculture., 53 (1): 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479715000290

[Wagner Jose Machado da Silva, Flavia Aparecida Santos Matias Machado da Silva, Rene Michel Ribeiro Pereira, Guilherme Castanheiro de Souza, Hiago Augusto Amaral Sacco, Camila Regina Silva Baleroni Recco, Jeruska Azevedo Moreira Brenha and Lucas Aparecido Manzani Lisboa. (2018); TECHNOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF SUGARCANE VARIETIES ATTACKED BY DIATRAEA SACCHARALIS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Mar). 562-568] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Lucas Aparecido Manzani Lisboa
Lecture, in Agronomy, at Educational Foundation of Andradina, state of São Paulo, Brazil.

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6702      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6702

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 29 | No. of Views: 104