Vol. 6 (02) pp. 1160-1169 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6541

THE EFFECT OF BOARD DIRECTOR ON THE BOARD COUNCIL FUNCTION AND CONFIGURATION.

and
  • Almadinah International University, Fallujah University-Iraq.
8 Downloads 81 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

This paper studies the Chief Executive Of?cers (CEOs) age effect on board council function and configuration. Through utilizing a sample of the 20 largest private university in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The base of the study is to examine whether age of CEOs show differences in board council configuration, official committees, or procedures that may show the board council more tolerant. The findings were age of CEOs and experience will reduce the board monitoring and control. This finding is mainly because of the variance in procedural mechanisms, instead of board configuration. Nevertheless, it is still vague about monitoring and tolerance control, which indicate that CEO?s capability of negotiating, monitoring, and control is less on the board function. It is an opportunity that younger CEOs also effect the board but they may heavily effected by non-compulsory conformance with stricter board council rules.

Article Analytics

References

  1. Aggarwal, R., Schloetzer, J. D., & Williamson, R. (2015). Do corporate governance mandates impact long-term firm value and governance culture? Journal of Corporate Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.06.007
  2. Bijman, J., Hendrikse, G., & van Oijen, A. (2013). Accommodating two worlds in one organisation: Changing board models in agricultural cooperatives. Managerial and Decision Economics, 34(3?5), 204?217. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2584
  3. Brown, L. H. (1997). Organizations for the 21st century? Co-operatives and ?new? forms of organization. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 22(1), 65?93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341564
  4. Cadbury, A. (1999). What Are The Trends in Corporate Governance? How Will They Impact Your Company? Long Range Planning, 32(1), 12?19. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=11938167&site=ehost-live
  5. Chaddad, F. R., & Cook, M. L. (2004). Understanding new cooperative models: An ownership-control rights typology. Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(3), 348?360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00184.x
  6. David, P., Kochhar, R., & Levitas, E. (1998). RESEARCH NOTES. THE EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ON THE LEVEL AND MIX OF CEO COMPENSATION. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 200?208. https://doi.org/10.2307/257102
  7. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20?47. https://doi.org/10.2307/259249
  8. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49?64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
  9. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance, 11(2), 102?111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00011
  10. Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. SAGE Publications, 1?816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04270_1.x
  11. Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2004). Context, Behavior, and Evolution Challenges in Research on Boards and Governance. Studies of Mgt. & Org, 34(2), 11?36. https://doi.org/10.2307/40397590
  12. Gil, R., & Zanarone, G. (2017). Formal and Informal Contracting: Theory and Evidence. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13(1).
  13. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2001). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  14. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, 88(1), 96?118. https://doi.org/10.2307/116820
  15. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383?396. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.10196729
  16. Hippmann, P., & Windsperger, J. (2013). Formal and real authority in interorganizational networks: The case of joint ventures. Managerial and Decision Economics, 34(3?5), 319?327. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2592
  17. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305?360. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  18. Jensen, M. C. (1993). the Modern Industrial Revolution , Exit , and the Failure of Internal Control Systems the Failure of Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831?880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
  19. Jones, T. M., & Keevil, A. A. (2015). ?Agents without Principals? Revisited: Theorizing the Effects of Increased Shareholder Participation in Corporate Governance. In Shareholder Empowerment, 103?135.
  20. Jussila, I., Goel, S., & Tuominen, P. (2012). Governance of Co-operative Organizations: A Social Exchange Perspective. Business and Management Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v1n2p14
  21. Katz, J. P., & Boland, M. A. (2002). One for all and all for one? A new generation of co-operatives emerges. Long Range Planning, 35(1), 73?89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00024-9
  22. Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board Composition and Corporate Performance: how the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 11(3), 189?205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00318
  23. Kim, J., Yang, D., & Lee, M. (2017). CEO Tenure, Market Competition, and Sticky Pay‐without‐performance as the Extraction of Rents, 46(2), 246?275.
  24. Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure. The Journal of Law and Economics, 41(1), 275?304.
  25. Korac Kakabadse, N., Kakabadse, A. K., & Kouzmin, A. (2001). Board governance and company performance: any correlations? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(1), 24?30. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005457
  26. Kumar, P., & Zattoni, A. (2014). Ownership, managerial entrenchment, and corporate performance. Corporate Governance (Oxford), 22(1), 1?3. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12053
  27. Larson, K. a, & Fulton, M. E. (2009). The Restructuring of the Saskatchewan Wheat Pool: Overconfidence and Agency. Journal of Cooperatives, 23, 1?19. Retrieved from http://accc.k-state.edu/ncera210/jocpdfs/v23/FultonLangSWP.pdf
  28. Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 13(3), 301?318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.09.002
  29. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403?441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
  30. Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2015). From Board Composition to Corporate Environmental Performance Through Sustainability-Themed Alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 423?435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7
  31. Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2004). Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: The role of institutions in forest management. Development and Change, 35(3), 435?461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x
  32. Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D. (1999). CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1829?1853. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00168
  33. Tufano, P., & Sevick, M. (1997). Board structure and fee-setting in the U.S. mutual fund industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 46(3), 321?355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X (97)00033-0
  34. Westphal, J. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1113?1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.205
  35. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 110?116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110

How to Cite This Article

Mohammed Alkhawlani and Saba Alhamdani. (2018); THE EFFECT OF BOARD DIRECTOR ON THE BOARD COUNCIL FUNCTION AND CONFIGURATION., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 6 (02), 1160-1169, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6541

Corresponding Author

Saba Alhamdani

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.