EFFECTIVENESS OF GSECE LEARNING MODEL (GUIDING, SEARCHING, EXPERIENCING, COMMUNICATING, EVALUATING) FOR PHYSICS LEARNING AT VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL.
- Department of Post Graduate Science Education, Jember University, East Java, Indonesia.
15 Downloads
125 Views
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to examine the effectiveness of GSECE learning model (Guiding, Searching, Experiencing, Communicating, Evaluating) for physics learning in Vocational High School. Effectiveness is determined by its impact on learning outcomes, student responses and student learning activities. This research was conducted at SMK Negeri 7 Jember with sample number 35 student of class X TKJ. Methodology: This research type is quasi experiment with control group design pretest and post test in the experimental group (n = 35), Data collection techniques used tests, questionnaires and observations. Data analysis techniques use independent sample t test to determine the impact of GSECE model on learning outcomes. Percentage technique to determine student response and student learning activities. Result: ressult of research that t count = 4.75 and t table = 1,99 (t count > t table) and P value (0,000<0,05) mean there is difference between experiment group and control group, percentage of student response in experiment group learning with GSECE learning model 78,46% (good category), control group 60,45% (good ), and percentage of learning activity of experimental group studying with GSECE 69,86% (active category), control group 62.92% (active category). Conclusion: the GSECE learning model is effective for physics learning as indicated by significant differences on learning outcomes, good student responses, and active learning category students' learning.
Keywords
Article Analytics
References
- Basaga H, Geban O, Tekkaya C, ?The Effect of the Inquiry Teaching Method on Biochemistry and Science Process Skills Achievements?, Biochem. Educ. 22:29-32, 1994. (journal style)
- Akinbobola, A.O. & Ado, I.B, ?Hands-on and minds-on strategies for teaching of force: guided discovery approach (pp. 65-72). In.: Udo, E., Uyoata, U, Inyang, N.E.O., Yero, H. & G.Bellp, G. (Eds.). Hands-on and minds-on strategies in the teaching of force?, Uyo: Afahaide & Bros Printing and Publishing Co, 2007.
- Texas Collaborative for Teaching Excellence, ?What We Know about the Learning Process?, (http://www.texascollaborative.org What We know about the learnig.htm) accessed January 24, 2011.
- Ulya Izzatul, ?Application of Learning Guided Discovery Learning Model Based on Lesson Study in Mathematics Class VIII Odd Semester at UPTD SMP Negeri 1 Prambon School year 2013/2014?, National Conference on Research on Mathematics and Learning (KNPMP I) 67, Muhammadiyah university, Surakarta, 2016.
- Dahar, R. W, ?Theories of Learn and Learning?, Jakarta: Erlangga, 2011.
- Nwagbo, C, ? Effects of Guided-Discovery and Expository Teaching Methods on the Attitudes Towards Biology of Students of with Different Levels of Scientific Literacy?, Science Teachers Association of Nigeria (STAN), 36, 43-51, 1999.
- Bilgin, I, ? The Effect of Hands-On Activities Incorporating a Cooperative Learning Approach on Eight Grade Student Science Process Skills and Attitudes Toward Science?, J. Baltic Sci. Educ. 1 (9): 27-37. 2006.
- Alliance for Childhood, ? Fiil?s Gold: A Critical Look at Computers in Childhood. Retrieved from http://www.allianceforchildhood.net/projects/computers/computers_reports.htm. 2000.
- T, ?Effect of Activity-Based Elementary Science on Student Outcomes: A Quantitative Synthesis?, Review of Educational Research, 53, 499-518. 1983.
- McDaniel, M. A. & Schlager, M. S, ? Discovery Learning and Transfer of Problem Solving Skills?, Cognition and Instruction, 7, 129-159, 1990.
- Schauble, L, ? The Development of Scientifict Reasoning in Knowledge-Rich Context?, Development Psychology, 32, 102-119, 1996.
- Stohr-Hunt, P, M, ? An Analysis of Frequency of Hands-on Experience and Science achievement?, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 101-109, 1996.
- Bajongga, S, ?Relationship Between Mastery of Physical Concept and Creativity with Problem Solving Ability in Basic Material of Static Electricity?, Journal of Research Field Research. ISSN: 0852-0151, Vol. 20 (1): 65-75, 2014.
- Mayer, R.E, ?Learning and instruction?, New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc, 2003.
- Bromley, K., Irwin-Devitis, A. & Modlo, M, ? Graphic organizers?, New York: Scholastic Professional Books, 1995.
- Khaerul, et al, ?Influence of problem-based model (PBM) using E-material-based teaching materials on understanding concept of physics on the students of class X SMA Negeri 1 Bimomaru?, Journal Physics Education Tadulako. ISSN: 2338-3240, Vol. 1 (3): 23-26, 2013.
- Hamdayana, J, ?Models and Methods of Creative Learning and Character?, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2014.
- Trianto, ?Integrated Learning Model: Concepts, Strategies and Implementation in Education Unit Level Curriculum (KTSP)?, Jakarta: PT. Earth Script, 2010.
- Afolabi, F & Akinbobola, A.O, ?Constructivist problem based learning technique and the academic achievement of physics student with low ability level in Nigerian secondary schools?, Eurasian J. Physics & Chemistry Education, 1, 45-51, 2009.
- Sapto et al, ?Learning Models in Environmental Education IT-Based at Vocational High School?, Ansinet: Journal if Applied Science, ISSN 1812-5654, 2015.
- Mulyasa, ?School Based Management?, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2006.
How to Cite This Article
Andik Kurniawan, Indrawati, Sudarti, Sutarto, I Ketut Mahardika and Iis Nur Asyiah. (2018); EFFECTIVENESS OF GSECE LEARNING MODEL (GUIDING, SEARCHING, EXPERIENCING, COMMUNICATING, EVALUATING) FOR PHYSICS LEARNING AT VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 6 (01), 1534-1538, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6385
Corresponding Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





