THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SUPERSTRUCTURE MATERIALS OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED RESTORATION. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

  • Lecture, Faculty of dentistry, MSA University.
  • Professor, Faculty of dentistry, MSA University.
  • Lecture, Faculty of dentistry, Fayoum university.
  • Lecture, Faculty of dentistry, Beni-suef University.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • References
  • How to Cite This Article
  • Corresponding Author

Objectives: The purpose of this review was to recognize the biological complication of implant superstructure materials in comparative to alveolar bone loss around superstructure. Methodology: A search on the electronic database and additional a manual searching was focused to detect randomized clinical trials and other studies that gives a sign about superstructure complication. alveolar bone loss was ascribed to the amount of rescission, crestal bone and loss Pocket depth. Results: The initial search gives a twenty-six from an initial search of 144 studies and the analyzing data were tabled rendering to output complication. Pocket probing depth were recognized in eighteen clinical studies, Pocket probing depth around all ceramic superstructure was 3.1 mm versus 3.5 mm for porcelain fused to metal superstructure. sixteen studies inspected the recession index for all ceramic and porcelain fused to metal superstructure. recession index ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 at porcelain fused to metal superstructure and 0 to 0.3 at all ceramic superstructure. alveolar bone loss around all ceramic superstructure was itemized to differ from 0.21 - 1.5 and 0.4 - 1.5 mm at porcelain fused to metal superstructure. Conclusion: The information described in this systematic review did not give an indication for the complication regarding all ceramic versus porcelain fused to metal superstructure. However, it can be settled that the assessment of the randomized clinical trials did not provide an absolute prime for the choice of ceramic or porcelain fused to metal as superstructure material relative to alveolar bone response.

  1. G. T?URK , M. ULUSOY, S. TOKSAVUL, P. G?UNERI & H. KOCA. Marginal bone loss of two implant systems with three different superstructure materials: a randomised clinical trial. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2013 40; 457?463.
  2. Andersen, E., Haanaes, H.R. & Knutsen, B.M. (2002) Immediate loading of single-tooth ITI implants in the anteriormaxilla: a prospective 5-year pilot study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 13: 281?287.
  3. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, Slauch RW, Balshi SF. A retrospective comparison of implants in the pterygomaxillary region: implant placement with two-stage, single-stage, and guided surgery protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013
  4. Berglundh, T., Persson, L. & Klinge, B. (2002) A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 29: 197?212.
  5. Bernard, J.P., Schatz, J.P., Christou, P., Belser, U. & Kiliaridis, S. (2004) Long-term vertical changes of the anterior maxillary teeth adjacent to single implants in young and mature adults. A retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 31: 1024?1028.
  6. Bianchi, A.E. & Sanfilippo, F. (2004) Singletooth replacement by immediate implant and connective tissue graft: a 1?9-year clinical evaluation. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 269?277.
  7. Bornstein, M.M., Schmid, B., Belser, U.C., Lussi, A. & Buser, D. (2005) Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 631?638.
  8. Bra?gger, U., Karoussis, I., Persson, R., Pjetursson, B., Salvi, G. & Lang, N. (2005) Technical and biological complications/failures with single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 326?334.
  9. De Boever, A.L. & De Boever, J.A. (2005) Guided bone regeneration around non-submerged implants in narrow alveolar ridges: a prospective long-term clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 549?556.
  10. Egger, M., Smith, G.D. & Sterne, J.A. (2001) Uses and abuses ofmeta-analysis. Clinical Medicine 1: 478?484.
  11. Elkhoury, J.S., McGlumphy, E.A., Tatakis, D.N. & Beck, F.M. (2005) Clinical parameters associated with success and failure of single-tooth titanium plasma-sprayed cylindric implants under stricter criteria: a 5-year retrospective study. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 20: 687?694.
  12. Furhauser, R., Florescu, D., Benesch, T., Haas, R., Mailath, G. & Watzek, G. (2005) Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 639?644.
  13. Gibbard, L.L. & Zarb, G. (2002) A 5-year prospective study of implant-supported single-tooth replacements. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 68: 110?116.
  14. Gotfredsen, K. (2004) A 5-year prospective study of single-tooth replacements supported by the Astra Tech implant: a pilot study. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research 6: 1?8.
  15. Haas, R., Polak, C., Furhauser, R., Mailath-Pokorny, G., Dortbudak, O. & Watzek, G. (2002) A long-term follow-up of 76
  16. Branemark single tooth implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 13: 38?43.
  17. Ha?mmerle, C.H., Chen, S.T. & Wilson, T.G.Jr. (2004) Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 19: 26?28.
  18. Hosseini M, Worsaae N, Schiodt M, Gotfredsen K. A 1-year randomised controlled trial comparing zirconia versus metal-ceramic implant supported single-tooth restorations. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011 Winter;4(4):347-61.
  19. Jemt, T. & Lekholm, U. (2005) Single implants and buccal bone grafts in the anterior maxilla: measurements of buccal crestal contours in a 6-year prospective clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research 7: 127?135.
  20. Kim EC, Kim MK, Leesungbok R, Lee SW, Ahn SJ. Co-Cr dental alloys induces cytotoxicity and inflammatory responses via activation of Nrf2/antioxidant signaling pathways in human gingival fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Dent Mater. 2016; 32: 1394-1405.
  21. Karabuda C, Yaltırık M, Bayraktar M: A clinical comparison of prosthetic complications of implant-supported overdentures with different attachment systems. Implant Dentistry, 2008; 17(1): 74?79
  22. Kirkwood, B.R. & Sterne, J.A.C. (2003a) Poisson regression. In: Essential Medical Statistics, 249? 262. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd. Kirkwood, B.R. & Sterne, J.A.C. (2003b) Survival analysis: displaying and comparing survival patterns. In: Essential Medical Statistics, 272?286.
  23. Lang, N.P., Berglundh, T., Heitz-Mayfield, L.J., Pjetursson, B.E., Salvi, G.E. & Sanz, M. (2004) Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding implant survival and complications. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 19: 150?154.
  24. Levin, L., Pathael, S., Dolev, E. & Schwartz-Arad, D. (2005) Aesthetic versus surgical success of single dental implants: 1- to 9-year follow-up. Practical Procedures & Aesthetic Dentistry 17: 533?538.
  25. Nothdurft F , Pospiech P. Prefabricated zirconium dioxide implant abutments for single-tooth replacement in the posterior region: evaluation of peri-implant tissues and superstructures after 12 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Aug;21(8):857-65.
  26. Mericske-Stern, R., Grutter, L., Rosch, R. & Mericske, E. (2001) Clinical evaluation and prosthetic complications of single tooth replacements by non-submerged implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 12: 309?318.
  27. Palmer, R.M., Palmer, P.J. & Smith, B.J. (2000) A 5-year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 11: 179?182.
  28. Pjetursson, B.E., Tan, K., Lang, N.P., Bragger, U., Egger, M. & Zwahlen, M. (2004a) A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 625?642.
  29. Pjetursson, B.E., Tan, K., Lang, N.P., Bragger, U., Egger, M. & Zwahlen, M. (2004b) A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 667?676.
  30. Romeo, E., Lops, D., Margutti, E., Ghisolfi, M., Chiapasco, M. & Vogel, G. (2004) Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a seven-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 19: 247?259.
  31. Tan, K., Pjetursson, B.E., Lang, N.P. & Chan, E.S. (2004) A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 654?666.
  32. Taylor, R.C., McGlumphy, E.A., Tatakis, D.N. & Beck, F.M. (2004) Radiographic and clinical evaluation of single-tooth Biolok implants: a 5-year study. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 19: 849?854.
  33. Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Siegenthaler D, Holderegger C, H?mmerle CH. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Mar;20(3):219-25.
  34. Sotto-Maior BS1, Senna PM, da Silva WJ, Rocha EP, Del Bel Cury AA. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):e13-8.
  35. Vigolo, P. & Givani, A. (2000) Clinical evaluation of single-tooth mini-implant restorations: a fiveyear retrospective study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 84: 50?54.
  36. Wagenberg, B. & Froum, S.J. (2006) A retrospective study of 1925 consecutively placed immediate implants from 1988 to 2004. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 21: 71?80.
  37. Wassermann, A., Kaiser, M. & Strub, J.R. (2006) Clinical long-term results of VITA In-Ceram Classic crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic literature review. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 19: 355?363.
  38. Wennstro?m, J.L., Ekestubbe, A., Grondahl, K., Karlsson, S. & Lindhe, J. (2005) Implant-supported single-tooth restorations: a 5-year prospective study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 32: 567?574.
  39. Yu SJ, Shan WL, Liu YX, Huang XY, Zhu GX. Effects of Four Different Crown Materials on the Peri-Implant Clinical Parameters and Composition of Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid. J Oral Implantol. 2017 Oct;43(5):337-344.
  40. Zembic A, B?sch A, Jung RE, H?mmerle CH, Sailer I. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Apr;24(4):384-90.
  41. Gallucci GO, Gr?tter L, Chuang SK, Belser UC. Dimensional changes of peri-implant soft tissue over 2 years with single-implant crowns in the anterior maxilla. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Mar;38(3):293-9.

M. Mokhtar, N. Fahmy, A. Mahrous and M. Radwan. (2018); THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SUPERSTRUCTURE MATERIALS OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED RESTORATION. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 6 (02), 1070-1079, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6531

mohamed ashraf mokhtar
modren science and arts university

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6531      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6531

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 32 | No. of Views: 141