14Mar 2018

GENOTYPE BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF SEED YIELD, AGRONOMIC CHARACTERS IN MUNGBEAN (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) GENOTYPES.

  • Food Legumes Section, Department of Agricultural Research, Yezin, Myanmar.
  • Department of Plant Breeding, Physiology and Ecology, Yezin Agricultural University, Myanmar.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Field experiments were conducted in monsoon season, 2011 at Food Legumes Section, Department of Agricultural Research (DAR), Yezin, Tatkon Research Farm and Sebin Research Farm by using Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications. Seven mungbean breeding lines (three lines from Yezin-9 x VC-6371-23-11, three lines from NM-92 x VC-6368-46-40 and one line from NM-92 mutant) and six released varieties were used to examine the genotype x environment (G x E) interaction on seed yield and to identify stable and high yielding mungbean genotypes across environments. Genotype x environment interaction was observed in all recorded characters except for seeds per pod. Mean seed yield performance in three environments indicated genotype YM-03-2-6 which produced the highest seed yield of 9.73 g per plant followed by Yezin-9 (9.57 g). YM-03-2-6 and Yezin-9 were stable genotypes with high mean yield that genotypes produced close to unity (b_i=1), non significant differences from regression coefficient (b_i) and deviation from regression (S_di^2) due to stability analysis with close to the zero of IPCA scores from the results of AMMI analysis. Genotype YM-03-2-5 produced average mean yield with high b_i and S_di^2 value and coupled with high positive interaction in Tatkon Research Farm while genotype YM-03-2-2 also produced average yield mean yield with low b_i and high S_di^2 value and coupled with high positive interaction in Sebin Research Farm. This showed that genotype YM-03-2-5 and YM-03-2-2 were better responsive to high yielding environment and poor environment, respectively. So, both the Stability analysis (Eberhart and Russell, 1966) and additive main effects and multiplicative interactions (AMMI) analysis considered YM-03-2-6 and Yezin-9 could be used as broad adaption varieties with high yield in all tested environments. Genotypes that could be used as good adaptation to specific environments were YM-03-2-5 for Tatkon Research Farm and YM-03-2-2 for Sebin Research Farm.

  1. Abo El-Zahab, A.A., M.A. Lakani, D.A. El-Kadi and A.M. Khattab. 1986. Analytical study for the genotypic stability of certain soybean (Glycine Max ) cultivars. Res. Bull. Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ. 35: 961-987.
  2. Agugo, B.A.C and G.O. Chukwu. 2009. Predicting the potential maximum yield of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] at different sowing dates in a rain forest location of southeastern Nigeria. 8 (9): 730-739.
  3. Ahmad, J., M.H. Choudhry, S. Salah-ud-Din and M. A. Ali. 1996. Stability for grain yield in wheat. J. Bot. 28:61-65.
  4. Allard , R.W. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York
  5. Berger, J.D., J. Speijers, R.L. Sapra, and U.C. Sood. 2007. Genotype by environment interaction and chickpea improvement. In: Chickpea Breeding and Management. Yadav SS, Redden RJ, Chen W, Sharma B (eds), CAB International. pp. 617-629.
  6. Bull, J. K., M. Cooper, I. H. Delacy, K. E. Basford and D. R. Woodruff. 1992. Utility of repeated checks for hierarchial classification of data from plant breeding trials. Field Crop. Res. 30:79-95.
  7. Crossa, 1990. Statistical analyses of multilocation trials.Adv. Agron. 44: 55-85.
  8. Das, S., R.C. Misra, M.C. Patnaik and S.R. Das. 2010. Genotype x environment interaction, adaptability and yield stability of mid - early rice genotypes. Indian J. Agric. Res. 44(2): 104-111.
  9. Eberhart, S. A. and W. A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, Madiso., 6(1): 36-40.
  10. Eisemann, R.L, M. Cooper, and D.R. Woodruff. 1990. Beyond the analytical methodology ? Better interpretation of genotype-by-environment interaction. In: Kang MS (ed) Genotype-by-environment Interaction and Plant Breeding. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. pp. 108-117.
  11. Fernandez, G.C.J and S. Shanmugasundaram. 1988. The AVRDC Mungbean Improvement Program: The Past, Present and Future. Proceeding of The Second International Symposium, AVRDC, Shanhua,Tainum.
  12. Finlay, K. W. and G. N. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding program. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research, East Melbourne. 14(6): 742- 754.
  13. Gauch, H.G. and Zobel, R.W. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials: In: karg, M.S. and Gauch, H.G (eds). Genotype by environment interaction. CRC Press, Bocarator, Florida, USA. pp. 85-
  14. Gauch, H.G., 1992. Statistial analysis of regional yield dat: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Amsterdam, Elsevier.
  15. Lai, M.S., S.K. Mehta and S.C. Pandya. 1974. Stability of performance of soybean varieties in Madhya Pradesh. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 44: 217-220.
  16. Misra, R.C., S. Das and M.C. Patnaik. 2009. AMMI model analysis of stability and adaptability of late duration finger millet (Eleusine coracana) genotypes. World Appl. Sci. J. 6(12): 1650 - 1654.
  17. MOAI (Ministry of Agricultural and Irrigation). 2011. Myanmar Agriculture in Brief. Ministry of Agricultural and Irrigation, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
  18. Nassib, A.M., S.A. Khalil and A.M. Khattab. 1986. Genotypic stability for advanced series of field bean Vicia faba genotypes. Proc. Conf. Agron., Alex., Egypt. 2: 401-416.
  19. Omar, M.A., A.M. Abdel-Hakim and M.M. El-Hady. 1999. Stability parameters for faba bean genotypes as criteria for response to environmental conditions. Annals, Agric. Sci., Ain-Shams Univ., Cairo. 44 (1):173-188.
  20. Piepho, H.P. 1998. Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems- a review. Journal of Agronomy Crop Sci. 180: 193-213.
  21. Poehlman, J.M. 1991. The Mungbean. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. NewDelhi.
  22. Purchase J.L. 1997. Parametric analysis to describe genotype x environment interaction and yield stability in winter wheat. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture of the University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
  23. Raffi, S. A., M. A. Newaz and N. Khan. 2004. Stability analysis for pod and seed production in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris ). Asian J. Plant Sci. 3(2):239-242.
  24. Redden, R.J.; I.H. DeLacy; D.G. Butler and T. Usher. 2000. Analysis of line x environment interactions for yield in navy beans. 2. Pattern analysis of lines and environment within years. Australian Journal of Agric. Re., 51:607-617.
  25. Sabah, M.A, M.M. El-hady, A.M.S.A. El-Taweel and E.H. El-Harty. 2007. Stability statistics of some faba bean genotypes. Annals of Agric. Sc., Monshtohor. 45(2): 525-544.
  26. Singh, R. J. and T. Hymowitz. 2001. Exploitation of wild potential Glycine species for improving the soybean. In: Bhatnagar P. S. (ed.), Proceedings of India Soy Forum. pp 58-61.
  27. Tarakanovas, P. and V. Ruzgus. 2006. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of grain yield of wheat varieties in Lithuania. Res. 4(1): 91 - 98.
  28. Tarakanovas, P. and V. Ruzgus. 2006. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of grain yield of wheat varieties in Lithuania. Res. 4(1): 91 - 98.
  29. Truberg, B., and M. Huehn. 2000. Contribution to the analysis of genotype by environment interactions: Comparison of different parametric and non-parametric tests for interactions with emphasis on crossover interactions. Crop Sci. 185:267?274.
  30. Vargas, M., J. Crossa, K. Sayre, M. Reynolds, M. Ramirez and M. Talbot. 1998. Interpreting genotype x interaction in wheat by partial least squares regression. Crop Sci. 38: 679-689.
  31. Yau, S.K. 1995. Regression and AMMI analyses of genotype-environment interactions: an empirical comparison. J. 87:121-126.
  32. Zobel, R.W., M.J. Wright and H.G. Gauch. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. J. 80: 388-393.

[Kyaw Swar Win, Kyi Win, Than Da Min, Nyo Mar Htwe and Tun Shwe. (2018); GENOTYPE BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF SEED YIELD, AGRONOMIC CHARACTERS IN MUNGBEAN (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) GENOTYPES. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Mar). 926-934] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Kyaw Swar Win
Yezin Agricultural University, Department of Agricultural Research

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6750      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6750

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 59 | No. of Views: 216