28Mar 2018

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS? METACOGNITION ABILITY THROUGH JUMPING TASK STRATEGY TO SOLVE GEOMETRY PROBLEM.

  • Magister student at Mathematics Education Department of Jember University. The teacher of Junior High School 3 Rambipuji.
  • Magister Lecturer at Mathematics Education Department of Jember University.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This research aimed at analyzing students? metacognition ability through Jumping Task strategy to solve geometry problem. Jumping Task is task-based instruction in which the task is challenging or beyond the standard of the curriculum. This research used descriptive qualitative research method. The samples were, according to the result of the test, 3 students from 32 students, who are high, average, and low achievers. The data was collected by using interview, test, observation and documentation. The result of this research revealed that S1 ability (high achiever) had the most complete metacognition ability rather than those who are average and low achievers. The student with high ability fulfilled all of the aspects as well as predicting, planning, monitoring and evaluating aspects. S2 ability (average achiever) had more complete metacognition ability rather than the low achiever. Average achiever fulfilled only prediction and planning aspects. Whereas, S3 ability (low achiever) fulfilled only prediction aspect, therefore, he had a lack of achieving his metacognitive steps.

  1. Sutji R. & Muh. Rizal. (2016). Metacognition Analysis of Junior High School Studnts 1 Buko in Solving School Math Problems. e-Jurnal Mitra Sains, 4(1), 58-65.
  2. Flavell, J. H. 1976. Metacognition aspects of problem-solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed), The nature of Intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Available online at http://tip.psvchology.org/meta.html.
  3. Hobri, 2016, ?Collaborative Learning, Caring Community, dan Jumping Task Aided student workseet based Scientific Approach: one of the alternative of mathematics learning ini MEA era?, Proceedings of a National Seminar on Mathematics Education, Theme : Mathematical Oppotunities and Learning in Facing the MEA. Jember: University of Jember, October 23rd, 2016.
  4. Hobri & Susanto, 2015, ?The Process in Designing Mathematicss Students Worksheet Based On Scientific Approach?, International Conference dengan tema : Trending Issued of Scholl Education in Advanced Countries, 12 Mei 2015, 100-109, Surabaya: Surabaya State University
  5. Kriswiyanti, Theresia, N. (2012). Metacognition of Accelerated Class Students in Solving Mathematical Problems. Jurnal Magistra 82 Th. XXIV December 2012 37 ISSN 0215-9511
  6. L. N. 2010. The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Co-Op Type to Improve Thinking and Mastery Learning Mathematics High School of Bandung .UPI Not Published.
7.??????? Listya, D. K., Riyadi. Imam, S. (2015). Metacognition process in solving mathematics problems in grade XI students in Banyumas State Senior High School. Electronic Journal of Mathematics Learning, 3(9), 1021-1034.
  1. Livingston, J. 1997. Metacognition: An Overview State Univ. Available online at http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/Metacog.htm.
  2. McLoughlin, C., and Hollingworth, R., 2003, Exploring a Hidden Dimension of Online Quality: Matacognitive Skill Development, 16th ODLAA Biennial Forum Conference Proceedings. www.signadou,acu.edu.au. Retrieved on January 12nd, 2008.
  3. Putri, S. P., Suherman, & Rosha, M. (2012). Penerapan strategi metakognitif dalam pembelajaran matematika siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Part 3, 1(1), 8-13.
11.???? Risnan, Santi. (2008). Metacognitive ability of students in learning mathematics. Pythagoras, 4(1), 86-98.
  1. Sato, Manabu. 2014, Reform School, Tokyo : Japan International Cooperation Agency.
  2. Sato, Masaaki, 2015, How do Teachres Turn to be Learning Professional ? Lesson Study in School as Learning Community, material inside Short Term on Lesson Study (STOLS) V for ITTEP (Institutes of Teachers Training and Education Personnel), 27 September to 23 October 2015, Tokyo : Japan International Cooperation Agency.
  3. Schoenfeld, A.(1992).Hand Book of Researh on Mathematicss Teaching and Learning, Mc Millan?New?York.
  4. Dian, S. N. A., & Suroto. (2013). Identify Students' Ability in Solving Problems of Social Arithmetic Viewed from Differences in Mathematical Ability. Journal of Mathematics Education STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo, 1 (1), 97- 106.
  5. Wilson, J. & Clarke, D. 2004. Toward the Modelling of Mathematicsal Metacognition. Mathematicss Education Research Journal, Vol.16, No.2, 25-4. http://www.merga.net.au/documents/MERJ_16_2_Wilson .pdf. [Retrieved on January 10th, 2017]

[Sugiarto, Susanto and Muhtadi Irvan. (2018); AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS? METACOGNITION ABILITY THROUGH JUMPING TASK STRATEGY TO SOLVE GEOMETRY PROBLEM. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Mar). 1375-1381] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Sugiarto
University of Jember

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6808      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6808

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 46 | No. of Views: 130