06Apr 2018

IMPLEMENTATION OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) LEARNING APPROACH TO REDUCE GENDER DISPARITY IN SCIENCE LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT.

  • Physics Education Department, Faculty of Education University of Lampung, Indonesia.
  • Magister Science Education Department, Faculty of Education University of Lampung, Indonesia.
  • Magister Physics Education Department, Faculty of Education University of Lampung, Indonesia.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The learning activities in the classroom cannot be separated from their models and approaches for the launch learning activities and improve the understanding of the concept and the intelligence of learners must be balanced with utilizing learning approach. One form of approach that supports independent learning process is Integrated Approach Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). This research is a quasi-experimental study. Results of samples paired t-test showed Sig.(2-tailed) 0.000 means there are differences in results pretest and posttest supported the test results that show the value of the effect size effect size of 0.90 for the experimental class men and 0.99 for women classified experimental large class. The test results independent sample t-test showed Sig.(p-value) to 0.782 posttest and 0.392 for N-Gain, showed no difference in the average understanding of the concept and according to test results. Analysis of Covariance Data posttest Sig.(p-value) 0.782 and N-Gain Sig.(p-value) 0.392, there was no difference in average learners' understanding of the concept of male and female. Thus, it can be concluded that with STEM-based approach to Problem Based Learning which have been tested can be used as an approach to reduce gender disparities and enhance participants understanding of the science concept.


  1. ACS. 2009. The estimates are very similar to those cited in STEM: Good Jobs Now and For the Futur
http://www.esa.doc.gov/Reports/stem-good-jobs-now-and-future.
  1. Afriana, J. 2017. Penerapan Project Base Learning Terintegrasi STEM untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains
Siswa Ditinjau dari Gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA. 2 (2): 202-2012. (Online). http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jppp. Accessed on? February 9th, 2018
  1. Alwan, A. A. 2011. Misconception of Heat and Temperature Among Physics Student Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences.12 (9): 600-614. (Online). http://sciencedirect.com. Accessed on November 3rd, 2017
  2. Beede,D., Julian,T., Langdon,D., McKittrick,G., Khan,B. &Doms,M. 2011.Women in stem:
A gender gap to innovation.U.S:Department of Commerce.(Online). http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/reports/documents/womeninstemagaptoinnovation8311.pdf
  1. Blackley, S., Rahmawati, Y., Fitriani, E., Sheffield, R., & Koul, R. 2018. Using a Makerspace approach to engange Indonesian primary students with STEM Issues in . Educational Research. 28 (1), 18-39. http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/blackley.pdf
  2. Breiner, J.M., Johnson, C.C., Harkness, S.S., & Koehler, C.M. 2012. What Is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partherships. School Science and Mathematics. 112(11): 3-11. (Online). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109. Accessed on December 19th, 2017
  3. Caleon, I. & Subramaniam, R. 2010.? Three- Tier? Diagnostic? Test? to? Assess? Secondary Students?Understanding of Waves .International Journal of Science Educati 32 (7):939?96. (Online). Tersedia https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500690902890130. Accessed on October19th, 2017
  4. Chou,C., Y. 2002. Science teachers? understanding of concepts in chemistry Proceedings of the National Science Counc 12(2):73-78. (Online).http://ejournal.stpi.narl.org.tw/index/items/download?viId=9C6F0728-1829-48DF-AFBE-96F03AB20601. Accessed on Novemver? 9th, 2017
  5. Cohen, L. H., Hettler, T. R., Pane, N. 1998. Posttraumatic Growth, In R. G. Tesdechi, C. L. Park, L. G. Calhoun (Eds). Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis. 333 (11): 23-42. (Online). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b636/f1f1593edded1d1cbf82e21d3a0de8cd0e04.pdf. Accessed on October 19th, 2017
  6. Gurca, D. &Gulbas, E. 2015. Development of three-tier heat, temperature and internalenergy diagnostic test. Research in Science & Technological? Education, Taylor? & Francis. 02635143. (4):1-21. (Online). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02635143. Accessed on November3rd, 2017
  7. Hafizah, D., Haris, V., & Eliwati 2014. Analisis Miskonsepsi?? Siswa?? Melalui?? Tes Multiple? Choice? Menggunakan? Certainty? Of Response Index Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika MAN1 Bukittinggi.???? Edusainstik?? Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA. 1(1):100-103
  8. Hake, R. R. 1999. Analyzing Change / Gain Score American Educational Research and Methodology. (Online). Diakses dari http://list.asu.edu. Accessed on December 19th, 2017
  9. 2016. TIMSS and PIRLS 2015 Achievment. Diakses http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/data-release-2015/pdf/overview-TIMSS-and-PIRLS-2015-achievment.pdf. Accessed on December 15th, 2017
  10. Maunah, &Wasis. 2014. Pengembangan Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test untuk Menganalisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Kelas X pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. .Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF). (Online).http://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/article/10909/32/article.pdf. Accessed on December 19th, 2017
  11. Morrison, J.S. 2006. Attribute of STEM Education. (Online). https://www.partnersforpubliced.org/uploadedFiles/TeachingandLearning/Career_and_Technical_Education/Attributes%20of%20STEM%20Education%20with%20Cover%202%20.pdf. Accessed on December 9th, 2017
  12. Mosik, ? M.? 2015.? Usaha? Mengurangi Terjadinya Miskonsepsi Fisika Melalui Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia. (6):98-103. (Online). Available https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JPFI/article/download/1120/1035.Accessed on December 15th, 2017
  13. 2016. PISA 2015 Result in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with they know. Available: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2015-results-overview.pdf. Accessed on December 3rd, 2017
  14. Reeve, E. M. & Avery, Z. K. 2013. Developing Effective STEM Professional Development Program. Journal of Technology Education. 25(1): 9-13.
  15. Rencher, A. C., 1998. Multivariate Statistical Inference and Application. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc
  16. 2006. Kekerasan Berbasis Gender. Yogyakarta: Fajar Pustaka
  17. Sanders, M. 2009. STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher. 68(4), 20-26.
  18. Silung,S.N.W. 2 Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor serta Kemungkinan Penyebabnya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Jurusan Fisika FMIPA UNESA: 180-185.
  19. Stump, GS, Hilpert, JC, Husman, J, Chung, WT, Kim, W. 2011. Collavorative learning in engineering students: gender and achievement. Journal of Engineering Education. 100 (3): 475-497
  20. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta
  21. Suryadi, A. & Idris, E. 2004. Kesetaraan Gender Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Ganesindo
  22. Susanti,D. 2 Penyusunan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Fisika SMA Kleas XI Pada Materi?? Usaha Dan? Energi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika. 2 (2): 16-19.
  23. Svandova, K.? 2? Secondary? School Students?Misconceptions about Photosynthesis and Plant Respiration: Preliminary Results. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,10(1):59-67
  24. Syahrul, D.? A.? & Setyarsih,? ? 2015. Identifikasi???? Miskonsepsi???? dan???? Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa dengan Three-tier Diagnostic Test? Pada? Materi? Dinamika? Rotasi.? Jurnal InovasiPendidikan Fisika (JIPF). 4(3):67-70. (Online). http://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/article/17155/32/article.pdf.? Accessed on March 3rd, 2018
  25. Tayubi,Y.R. 20 Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Pada Konsep-Konsep Fisika Menggunakan Certainty of Rensponse Index (CRI). Mimbar Pendidikan UPI. 24(3):4-9. (Online). http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/JURNAL/JURNAL_MIMBAR_PENDIDIKAN/MIMBAR_NO_3_2005/Identifikasi_Miskonsepsi_Pada_Konsep-Konsep_Fisika_Menggunakan_Certainty_of_Response_Index_(CRI).pdf
  26. Thompson, ? & Logue,? S.? 2006.? An exploration of common student misconceptions in? science .? International? Education? Journal. 7(4):553-559. (Online). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ854310.pdf.Accessed on March 3rd, 2018
  27. Wahyuningsih,T. 2013. Pembuatan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Fisika SMA Kelas X Jurnal PendidikanFisika. 1(1):111-117.(Online). http://jurnal-online.um.ac.id/data/artikel/artikel4A12C3D2FC605F3C92B60E2877DF1A24.pdf. Accessed on November19th, 2017
  28. Wang, H., Moore, T.J., Roehrig, G.H., Park, M. 2011. STEM Integration: Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Journal of Pre-Collage Engineering Education Research. 1(2):1-13.(Online).https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/94df/074a64e42615ad7448fc273eeb861d2ca7cb.pdf. Accessed on November13rd, 2017

[Maretha Zahara, Abdurrahman Abdurrahman, Chandra Ertikanto and Agus Suyatna. (2018); IMPLEMENTATION OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) LEARNING APPROACH TO REDUCE GENDER DISPARITY IN SCIENCE LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Apr). 308-316] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Abdurrahman Abdurrahman
Physics Education Department, Faculty of Education University of Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6859      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6859