30Apr 2018

THE IMPACT MODULE OF DINAMICS BASE PROCESS IMAGE ON CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING OF STUDENTS.

  • University of Jember, Jember, Indonesia 68121.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Process image is defined as a series of images of objects, events or phenomena, which the images of one and another are relatively different in terms of circumtances, position, shape, or their combinations, as a whole describes a coherently phase and a unified whole. The aim of this research is to analyse the impact of module dynamics base process image on the student?s concept understanding in senior high school. The impact of the module is shown by difference of student?s concept understanding before and after learning with module dynamics base process image. This research is a quasi experiment by using one group pre-test and post test-design. The subject of this research is students class X senior high school. The technique of data collect in this research is test before and after learning with module of dynamics base process image. The analyze of data in this research is paired sample t-test with IBM SPSS 20. The result shows that student?s concept understanding is increas after using module dynamics base process image.

  1. Coca, D., Slisko, Josip. 2013. Software Socrative and Smartphone as Tools for Implementation of Basic Processes of Active Learning in Classroom: An Initial Feasinility Study With Prospective Teachers. European Journal of Physics Education vol 4(2).
  2. Cui, C., Lin, P., Nie, X., Yin, Y., & Zhu, Q. 2017. Hybrid textual-visual relevance learning for content-based image retrieval. Journal of Visual Communication snd Image Representation. Vol 48. 367-374.
  3. Dimyati & Mudjiono. 2009. Learn and Learning. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta
  4. Dircknick-Holmfeld, L. 2009. Innovation of Problem Based Learning Through ICT: Link Local and Global Experiences. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT vol 5(1): 3-12
  5. Giancoli, D. C. (2014). PHYSICS. Erlangga. Jakarta.
  6. Good, J.J., Woodzicka, J.A., dan Wingfield, L.C., (2010), The Effects of Gender Stereotypic and Calcer-Stereotypic Textbook Images on Science Performance, Journal of Social Psychology 150(2): 132?147
  7. Harianto, R., Sutarto, & Indrwati, 2017. Development of Module Based on Procces Image for Learning of Circular Motion in Senior High School. Journal of Pancaran. DOI 10.25037.
  8. Jatmiko, B., et al. 2016. Effectiveness of the INQF-Based Learning on a General Physics for Improving Outcomes. Journal of Baltic Science Education. vol 15(4). ISSN: 1648-3898.
  9. Karsli, F. & Calik, M. 2012. Can Freshman Science Student Teachers? Alternative Conceptions of ?Electrochemical cells? be fully diminished?. Asian Journal of Chemistry vol 24(2): 485-491.
  10. Nagpal, K., Priyamakhija, L. James & Gyanprakash. (2013). Independent Learning and Student Development. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 2(2), 27-35.
  11. Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R., & Haugan, M. P. 2008. What Make Physics Difficult?. International Journal of Enviroonmental & Science Education, 3(1): 30-34
  12. Park, S., Lee, S. Y., Oliver, J. S., & Cramond, B. (2006). Changes in Korean science teacher?s perceptions of creativity and science teaching after participating in an overseas professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17 (1), 37-64.
  13. Rufii. (2015). Developing Module on Constructivist Learning Strategies to Promote Students? Independent and Performance. Internasional Journal of Education, 7(1), 1948-5476.
  14. Sanders, D. L. 2007. Making ublic the Private Life of Plants: The contribution of informal learning environments. International Journal of Science Education vol 29(10): 1209-1228.
  15. Sharif, I., Wills, T. A., & Sargent, J. 2010. Effect of Visual Media Use on School Performance: A Prospective Study. Journal of Adolescent Health. Vol 46 (1). 52-61
  16. Sudjana, N. 2012. Media Asessment of Teaching and learning Outcomes. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  17. Syahroni, M.W., et al. (2016). The Effect of Using Digimon (Science Digital Module) with Scientific Approach at The Visualization of Student Independent and Learning Result. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 2339-1286.
  18. Wicaksono, I., Wasis, Madladzim. 2017. The Effectiveness of Virtual Science Teaching Model (VS-TM) to Improve Student Scientivic Creativity and Concept Mastery On Senior High School Physics Subject. Journal of Baltic Science Education. Vol 16(4). ISSN 1648-3898.
  19. Wospakrik, H. J. Basic Mathematics for Physics. Bandung
  20. Yusmar, F., et al. 2017. A Concept: Enhancing Biology Learning Quality by Using Procces Image. Journal of Pancaran . DOI 10.25037Bakken, J. P., & Simpson, C. G. 2011. Mnemonic strategies: success for the young-adult learner. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning. 7 (2).

[Sutarto, Indrawati and Rony Harianto. (2018); THE IMPACT MODULE OF DINAMICS BASE PROCESS IMAGE ON CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING OF STUDENTS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Apr). 1297-1300] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Sutarto
University of Jember

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6982      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6982

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 11 | No. of Views: 102