13May 2018

BIOCHEMICALS ASSOCIATED WITH CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS RESISTANCE IN SOYBEAN.

Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
  • Captures
    • Readers: 10
see details

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Soybean is a very important crop worldwide because of its 40% protein and 20% oil content. However, soybean suffers damage from bruchid (Callosobruchus chinensis) during storage. Understanding of factor(s) contributing to bruchid resistance is useful for development of soybean cultivars with genetic resistance to bruchid damage. Biochemicals associated with resistance to Callosobruchus chinensis were investigated on eight soybean genotypes with varying levels of resistance. Significant differences (P<0.05) were observed amongst genotypes with regards to antinutritional factors particularly total antioxidants (TAOX), tannins, peroxidase (POD), and flavonoids. There were no significant differences among genotypes with regards to nutritional factors particularly proteins, starch, lipid peroxidation, and reducing sugars. A resistant genotype AVRDC G8527 had the highest concentration of total antioxidants (1.98 AU min-1 mg-1) and tannins (1.85mg TAE 100g-1) followed by Maksoy 3N while the least was in a very susceptible genotype AGS 292 (TAOX=0.39 AU min-1 mg-1, Tannin=0.296 mg TAE 100g-1). AGS 292 had the highest concentration of flavonoids (31.22 mg QE 100g-1) while AVRDC G8527 had the least (5.13 mg QE 100g-1). Peroxidase activity was highest in AVRDC G89 (0.27AU min-1 mg-1) while AGS 292 had the least (0.07AU min-1 mg-1). From the correlation analysis, a significant strong negative relationship between flavonoids and tannin (r=-0.73**) and TAOX (r=-0.71**) but a positive non significant relationship with phenolic (r=0.22) and alkaloids (r=0.37) was recorded. Peroxidase activity had a significant relationships with median development period (r=0.69*) indicating that increased peroxidase activity resulted into increased seed resistance through prolonged insect development period. There was a strong relationship between tannins and total antioxidants (r=0.99**). These results indicate that secondary metabolites; peroxidase, tannin, and TAOX were biochemicals associated with higher resistance to C. chinensis in soybean while flavonoids were associated with higher susceptibility.

  1. Ahmed, D., Khan, M., & Saeed, R. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Phenolics, Flavonoids, and Antioxidant and Antibacterial Potential of Methanolic, Hexanic and Aqueous Extracts from Adiantum caudatum Leaves. Antioxidants, 4(2), 394?409. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox4020394
  2. Babu, J., & Hegde, J. N. (2012). Influence of Enzymes , Peroxidase and Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase ( PAL ) Acitivities on the Incidence of Bruchid ( Callosobruchus Theobromae L .) on Selected Fieldbean Accessions. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(2), 197?199.
  3. Barbehenn, R. V., & Constabel, C. P. (2011). Tannins in plant-herbivore interactions. Phytochemistry, 72(13), 1551?1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.040
  4. Belay, M., Msiska, U. M., Mehari, H., Malinga, G., Odong, T., Richard, E., ? Samuel, K. (2017). Biochemical Basis of Cowpea Resistance To Bruchid, Callosobruchus Maculatus (F.). International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(10), 219?227. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5524
  5. Calatayud, P., Tertuliano, M., & R?, B. Le. (1992). Influence of phenolic compounds on the relatioship between the cassava mealybug and its host plants. In Proceedings of the 8th Symposium. Insect-Plant relationships. (p. 112). Brazaville, Congo: Dordrecht:Kluwer Academy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1654-1_77
  6. Chung, H. (2009). Characterization of antioxidant activities of soybeans and assessment of their bioaccessibility after in vitro digestion. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Virginia.
  7. Dhole, V. J., & Reddy, K. S. (2016). Association of phytic acid content with biotic stress tolerance in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Phytoparasitica, 44(2), 261?267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-016-0514-5
  8. Dugje, I. Y., Omoigui, L. O., Ekeleme, F., Bandyopadhyay, R., Lava Kumar, P., & Kamara, Y. (2009). Farmers ? Guide to Soybean Production in Northern Nigeria, (May), 21.
  9. Fawki, S., Khaled, A. S., Fattah, H. M. A., Hussein, M. A., Mona, I. M., & Salem, D. A. M. (2012). Physical and Biochemical Basis of Resistance in Some Cowpea Varieties against Callosobruchus maculatus ( F .). Egyptian Journal of Pure and Applied Science, 2012, 051?061.
  10. Gibson, Lance and Benson, G. (2005). Origin, History and Uses of Soybean. Iowa State University, Department of Agronomy. Retrieved from http://agron-www.agron.iastate.edu/Courses/agron212/Readings/Soy_history.htm
  11. Guo, F., Lei, J., Sun, Y., Chi, Y. H., Ge, F., Patil, B. S., ? Zhu-Salzman, K. (2012). Antagonistic regulation, yet synergistic defense: Effect of bergapten and protease inhibitor on development of Cowpea Bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus. PLoS ONE, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041877
  12. Harbone, J. (1980). Harborne. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, 8, 1120?1132.
  13. Hodges, D. M., Delong, J. M., Forney, C. F., Prange, R. K., Delong, J. M., Hodges, D. M., ? Prange, R. K. (1999). the Thiobarbituric Anthocyanin for Estimating Lipid Peroxidation in Plant Tissues Containing and Other Interfering. Planta, 207(4), 604?611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050524
  14. Kale, A., Gaikwad, S., Mundhe, K., Deshpande, N., & Salvekar, I. (2010). Quantification of phenolics and flavonoids by spectrophotometer from-Juglans regia. Retrieved from http://www.cabdirect.org/
  15. Kolawole, A., & Kolawole, A. (2014). Insecticides and Bio-insecticides Modulate the Glutathione-related Antioxidant Defense System of Cowpea Storage Bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus). International Journal of Insect Science, 2014(6), 79?88. https://doi.org/10.4137/IJIS.S18029
  16. Lattanzio, V., Lattanzio, V. M. T., Cardinali, A., & Amendola, V. (2006). Role of phenolics in the resistance mechanisms of plants against fungal pathogens and insects. Phytochemistry (Vol. 661).
  17. Mahatma, M. K., Bhatnagar, R., Mittal, G. K., & Mahatma, L. (2011). Phenol metabolism in downy mildew resistant and susceptible genotypes of pearl millet. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 44(7), 623?636. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235400903266404
  18. Mizobutsi, G. P., Finger, F. L., Ribeiro, R. A., Puschmann, R., Ludmila, ;, De, L., ? Mota, D. (2010). Peroxidase and polyphenoloxidase activities of litchi pericarp Effect of pH and temperature on peroxidase and polyphenoloxidase activities of litchi pericarp. Agric. (Piracicaba, 67(2), 213?217. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162010000200013
  19. Mrudula, C. M., & Prabhu, A. A. (2014). Phytochemical quantification and antioxidant capabilities of Moringaoleifera , Basellaalba and Centellaasiatica leaf sources. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 9243?9251.
  20. Murithi, H. M., Beed, F., Tukamuhabwa, P., Thomma, B. P. H. J., & Joosten, M. H. A. J. (2016). Soybean production in eastern and southern Africa and threat of yield loss due to soybean rust caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Plant Pathology, 65(2), 176?188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12457
  21. Nahdy, S. M. 1995. (n.d.). Biotic and Abiotic Factors influencing the Biology and Distribution of Common Storage Pests of Pigeon pea. University of Reading, UK.
  22. Nuwamanya, E., Patrick, R. R., Ssetumba, M., Samuel, K., Joseph, F. H., & Yona, B. (2014). Biochemical and secondary metabolites changes under moisture and temperature stress in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). African Journal of Biotechnology, 13(31), 3173?3186. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2014.13663
  23. O?Bryan, C. A., Kushwaha, K., Babu, D., Crandall, P. G., Davis, M. L., Chen, P., ? Ricke, S. C. (2014). Soybean Seed Coats: A Source of Ingredients for Potential Human Health Benefits-A Review of the Literature. Journal of Food Research, 3(6), 188. https://doi.org/10.5539/jfr.v3n6p188
  24. Onyido, A. E., Zeibe, C. C., Okonkwo, N. J., Ezugbo-Nwobi, I. K., Egbuche, C. M., Udemezue, O. I., & Ezeanya, L. C. (2011). Damage Caused By the Bean Bruchid , Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) on Different Legume Seeds on Sale in Awka and Onitsha Markets , Anambra State , South Eastern Nigeria. African Research Review, 5(21), 116?123. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v5i4.69264
  25. Parthiban, V. K., V., P., & Prabakar, K. (2012). CHANGES IN THE BIOCHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF CARROT ROOTS DUE TO BACTERIAL SOFT ROT Post Harvest Technology Centre , 2 Department of Plant Pathology , Tamil Nadu Agricultural University , Coimbatore , Tamil Nadu , India Collection of samples Isolation of or. Pharmaceutical Technology, (1), 231?238.
  26. Pereira, D. M., Valent?o, P., Pereira, J. A., & Andrade, P. B. (2009). Phenolics: From chemistry to biology. Molecules, 14(6), 2202?2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules14062202
  27. Price, M. L., & Butler, L. G. (1977). Rapid Visual Estimation and Spectrophotometric Determination of Tannin Content of Sorghum Grain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 25(6), 1268?1273. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60214a034
  28. Sales, M. P., Gerhardt, I. R., Grossi-De-S?, M. F., & Xavier-Filho, J. (2000). Do legume storage proteins play a role in defending seeds against bruchids? Plant Physiology, 124(2), 515?522. https://doi.org/10.1104/PP.124.2.515
  29. Shannon, L. ., Kay, E., & Lew, J. . (1966). from Horseradish Roots. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 241(9), 2166?2172.
  30. Sharma, S., & Thakur, D. R. (2014a). Biochemical basis for bruchid resistance in cowpea, chickpea and soybean genotypes. American Journal of Food Technology, 9(6), 318?324. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajft.2014.318.324
  31. Sharma, S., & Thakur, D. R. (2014b). Studies on the varietal preference of Callosobruchus macualtus on soybean genotypes. Asian Hournal of Biiological Sciences, 2014, 1?5. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbs.2014
  32. Singh, R. J., Nelson, R. L., & Chung, G. (2006). Soybean ( Glycine max ( L .) Merr .). In J. Singh (Ed.), Genetic Resources,Chromosome engineering and Crop Improvement: Oilseed Crops (pp. 13?49). Broken Sound Parkway, USA: CRS Press.
  33. Somta, P., Ammaranan, C., Ooi, P. A. C., & Srinives, P. (2007). Inheritance of seed resistance to bruchids in cultivated mungbean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek). Euphytica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9299-9
  34. Spradbery, P. (2013). Invasive species compendium. Com.Au, 4066. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS
  35. Swella, G. B., & Mushobozy, D. M. K. (2009). Comparative susceptibility of different legume seeds to infestation by cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Plant Protection Science, 45(1), 19?24.
  36. Taulavuori, E., Hellstr?m, E., Taulavuori, K., & Laine, K. (2001). Comparison of two methods used to analyse lipid peroxidation from Vaccinium myrtillus (L.) during snow removal, reacclimation and cold acclimation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52(365), 2375?2380. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.365.2375
  37. Tefera, H. (2015). Breeding for Promiscuous Soybeans at IITA. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, (1), 147?162. https://doi.org/10.5772/14533
  38. Vijay, D. T., & Rajendra, S. . (2014). RESEARCH AND REVIEWS : JOURNAL OF PHARMACOGNOSY Estimation of Total Phenol , Tannin , Alkaloid and Flavonoid in, 2(4), 41?47.
  39. War, A., Paulraj, M., Hussain, B., & Buhroo, A. (2013). Effect of plant secondary metabolites on legume pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera. Journal of Pest, 86(3), 399?408. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10340-013-0485-y
  40. War, A. R., Murugesan, S., Boddepalli, V. N., Srinivasan, R., & Nair, R. M. (2017). Mechanism of Resistance in Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek var. radiata] to bruchids, Callosobruchus spp. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Frontiers in Plant Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01031
  41. War, A. R., Paulraj, M. G., Ahmad, T., Buhroo, A. A., Hussain, B., Ignacimuthu, S., & Sharma, H. C. (2012). Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 7(10), 1306?1320. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.21663
  42. Wong, S. K., Lim, Y. Y., & Chan, E. W. C. (2009). Antioxidant properties of Hibiscus: Species variation, altitudinal change, coastal influence and floral colour change. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 21(4), 307?315.
  43. Wu, K., Zhang, J., Zhang, Q., Zhu, S., Shao, Q., Clark, K. D., ? Ling, E. (2015). Plant phenolics are detoxified by prophenoloxidase in the insect gut. Scientific Reports, 5, 1?15. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16823
  44. Yahaya, I. A., Nok, A. J., & Bonire, J. J. (2013). Chemical studies of the Peel of Xanthosoma sagittifolium (Tannia Cocoyam). Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 12(1), 40?44.
  45. Young, V. R. (1991). Soy protein in relation to human protein and amino acid nutrition. J Am Diet Assoc, 91(7), 828?835.
  46. Zarkadas, C. G., Gagnon, C., Gleddie, S., Khanizadeh, S., Cober, E. R., & Guillemette, R. J. D. (2007). Assessment of the protein quality of fourteen soybean [ Glycine max ( L .) Merr .] cultivars using amino acid analysis and two-dimensional electrophoresis, 40(1), 129?146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2006.08.006
  47. Zarkadas, C. G., Yu, Z., Voldeng, H. D., & Minero-Amador, A. (1993). Assessment of the Protein Quality of a New High-Protein Soybean Cultivar by Amino Acid Analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 41(4), 616?623. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00028a021
  48. Zhu-Salzman, K., Luthe, D. S., & Felton, G. W. (2008). Arthropod-Inducible Proteins: Broad Spectrum Defenses against Multiple Herbivores. Plant Physiology, 146(3), 852?858. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.112177

[Msiska U.M., Miesho B.W., Hailay M.G., Kyamanywa S., Rubahaiyo P., Odong T., Tukamuhabwa P., Nuwamanya E., and D.L. Nabirye (2018); BIOCHEMICALS ASSOCIATED WITH CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS RESISTANCE IN SOYBEAN. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (May). 292-305] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Msiska Ulemu Mercy
Makerere University, P.O.Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7032      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7032

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 45 | No. of Views: 138