08Jun 2018

5S ENRICHED AS A WORKPLACE ADVANTAGE TOWARD ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE

  • (PhD Student, UniKL Business School, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia).
  • (Senior Lecturer, UniKL Business School, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia).
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Purpose- The purpose is to study the examining of 5S?s as an organizer of workplace advantage toward administration performance in education sector. Secondly, getting of this core objective of predictor directly and indirectly association estimate on administration performance. The design of this study was quantitative approach, where quantitative research predictable of important to recover the knowledge and measurement of important aspects regarding the characteristics of management tools into the test of hypotheses. The target populations were of private and public university in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and respondents were from officer to top management. Primary data was obtained from number of 19 universities with 93 respondents. There are three hypotheses developed through literature reviews tested using correlation and liner regression analysis executed by SPSS 20.V Software. Findings- While execution of survey data the mediating impact of workplace advantage, it was found that statistically significant and positive impacts on the relationship between 5S practices and administration performance has significantly increased. Recommendations- Further studies including with other locations can combine together to test and verifying the structural equation model.

  1. Ghodrati and N. Zulkifli, ?The Impact of 5S Implementation on Industrial Organizations? Performance,? Int. J. Bus. Manag. Invent. ISSN (Online, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 2319?8028, 2013.
  2. Mahzan, N. Aishah, and B. Hassan, ?Internal audit of quality in 5s environment: Perception on critical factors, effectiveness and impact on organizational performance,? Int. J. Acad. Res. Account. Financ. Manag. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 92?102, 2015.
  3. Singh and I. S. Ahuja, ?Review of 5S methodology and its contributions towards manufacturing performance,? Int. J. Process Manag. Benchmarking, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 408, 2015.
  4. D. Peters, B. Wieder, S. G. Sutton, and J. Wakefield, ?Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage,? Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst., vol. 21, pp. 1?17, 2016.
  5. S. Randhawa and I. S. Ahuja, ?5S ? a quality improvement tool for sustainable performance: literature review and directions,? Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 334?361, 2017.
  6. Rai, ?Effectiveness of 5S Implementation on Organizations Performance,? Abhinav Int. Mon. Ref. J. Res. Manag. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1?10, 2016.
  7. Cappelli and A. Tavis, ?The performance management revolution,? Harvard Business Review, vol. 2016, no. October. 2016.
  8. R. Kiran and D. R. Kiran, ?5S,? in Total Quality Management, 2017, pp. 333?346.
  9. Institute, ?About 5S,? Global Operations, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://ci.kaizen.com/knowledge-center/what-is-5s.html. [Accessed: 03-Apr-2018].
  10. Gupta and S. K. Jain, ?The 5S and kaizen concept for overall improvement of the organisation: a case study,? Int. J. Lean Enterp. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 22, 2014.
  11. Bashir and R. Verma, ?Why Business Model Innovation Is the New Competitive Advantage.,? J. Bus. Strategy, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7?17, 2017.
  12. Munizu, ?The Impact of Total Quality Management Practices towards Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance : Case of Fishery Industry in South Sulawesi Province of Indonesia,? PAkistan J. Commer. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 184?197, 2013.
  13. K. Ranjith, ?ScienceDirect Business Models and Competitive Advantage,? Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 37, pp. 203?207, 2016.
  14. Blackman, F. Buick, and M. O?Donnell, ?Why Performance Management Should Not Be Like Dieting*,? Aust. J. Public Adm., vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 524?528, 2017.
  15. Sun and A. C. Henderson, ?Transformational Leadership and Organizational Processes: Influencing Public Performance,? Public Adm. Rev., vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 554?565, 2017.
  16. S. Randhawa and I. S. Ahuja, ?Evaluating impact of 5S implementation on business performance,? Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 948?978, 2017.
  17. Jugraj Singh and A. Inderpreet Singh, ?5S ? a quality improvement tool for sustainable performance: literature review and directions,? Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 334?361, 2017.
  18. P. Kiefer, J. Carrillo-Hermosilla, P. Del R?o, and F. J. Callealta Barroso, ?Diversity of eco-innovations: A quantitative approach,? J. Clean. Prod., vol. 166, pp. 1494?1506, 2017.
  19. Cho and S. Kim, ?Cronbach?s Coefficient Alpha,? Organ. Res. Methods, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 207?230, 2015.

[Mamun Mia, Shuhel Miah and Yahya Majri. (2018); 5S ENRICHED AS A WORKPLACE ADVANTAGE TOWARD ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Jun). 277-283] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Md. Mamun Mia

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7211      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7211

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 25 | No. of Views: 95