DEVELOPMENT OF REAL QUESTING LEARNING MODEL FOR BIOLOGY LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL.

  • Postgraduate Student of Science Education Program, University of Jember, Indonesia.
  • Biology Teacher on Senior High School of Panarukan, Situbondo, Indonesia.
  • Postgraduate Lecture of Science Education Program, University of Jember, Indonesia.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • How to Cite This Article
  • Corresponding Author

Learning on Curriculum 2013 is expected to enrich students\' learning experiences through a scientific approach. One of the activities ofscientific learning approach isquestioning. Questioning activities are expected to arise from students. But the activity of asking students in biology learning is still low. Therefore,the REALQUESTING learning model is developed to improve students\'questioning skills.Product quality criteria for model development are validity, practicality, and effectiveness. The purpose of this research is to develop a valid, practical, and effective REAL QUESTING learning model. The research method used in this research is the research method of development of Borg and Gall. Based on the results of data analysis can be concluded that the development of REAL QUESTING learning model meets the three aspects of product quality criteriathose are the validity 88.40 (very valid), practicality 81.40 (highly implemented) and, the effectiveness of the student,s questioning skill 77.50 (good), student learning with N-Gain analysis 0.75 (high), and student response 89.14 (strongly agreed) for use in main field testing.

  1. Akbar, S. 2015. Teaching and Learning Instrument. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  2. Boleng, D.T. dan A.D. Corebima. 2014. Cooperative learning models having the better potency to improve the social attitude of multiethnic senior high school students at Samarinda, Indonesia. Journal of Educational Research and Reviews. 2(3): 36-44.
  3. Bolton, S. Dan Hattie. 2017. Cognitive and brain development: executive function, Piaget, and the prefrontal cortex. Archives of Psychology. 1(3): 1-36.
  4. J.S. 1966.Toward The Theory Of Instruction. Newyork: Norton
  5. Borg, W.R. dan M.D. Gall. 1983. Educational Research: An Introduction Fourth Edition. New York: Longman.
  6. Bozkurt, G. 2017. Social constructivism: does it succeed in reconciling individual cognition with social teaching and learning practices in mathematics? Journal of Education and Practice. 8(3):210-218.
  7. Chin, C. Dan J. Osborne. 2008. Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1): 1-39,
  8. Evans, J. 1987. Investigations, the state of the art. Mathematics in School 16(1): 27-30.
  9. Gulacar, O. C.R. Browman A. Feakes. 2013. Observational investigation of student problem solving: The role and importance of habits Science Education International 2(2): 344-3600
  10. Hake, 2007. Six Lessons From The Physics Education Reform Effort. Lat. American Journal of Physics.1(1), 24-31.
  11. Haryadi, S. D. Corebima, S. Zubaidah,.Ibrohim. 2017. The Comparison of the Question types in the RQA (Reading, Questioning, Answering) learning model and conventional learning model. International Journal of Humanities social sciences and education (IJHSE).4(7):1018
  12. Hynes M.B and G. Berry. 2014. Reading an object: developing effective scientific inquiry using student questions. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2(2):87-97
  13. Joyce, B., M. Weil, dan E. Calhoun. 2009. Models of Teaching. Eighth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education
  14. Ministry of Education and Culture. 2015. Strategy and Planning of Indonesia Ministry of Eduction and Culture 2015-2019. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture
  15. Matsumoto, K. 2017. A review of Jerome Bruner's educational theory: its implications for studies in teaching and learning and active learning (secondary publication). Journal Of Nagoya Gakuin University; Social Sciences.53(4): 129-146
  16. Moeed, A. 2013. Science investigation that best supports student learning: Teachers' understanding of science investigation. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education.8:537-559
  17. Nieveen, (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. dalam J.V.D Akker et. al (Eds), Design approaches and tools in Education and Training. Dordrecht: Springer-Science-Business Media-Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  18. Nieveen, 2010. Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research. dalam Tjeer Plum and Nienke Nieeveen (Ed). An Introduction. to Educational Design Research. Netherlands in www.slo.nl/organisatie/international/ publications
  19. Otukile dan M.Mpho. 2018. Teacher-centered dominated approaches: their implications for today?s inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling. 10(2): 11-21.
  20. Tabulawa R. 2006. International aid agencies, learner-centred pedagogy and political democratisation: A critique. Educ. 39(11):7-26.
  21. A.A A. 2017.The influence of think-pair-share (tips) on improving students? oral communication skills in EFL classrooms. Creative Education. 8:12-23
  22. Santrock, J. W. 2011. Educational Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies
  23. Schunk, D.H. 2012. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective; Sixth Edition. Boston: Pearson Education.
  24. Shaymin, A. 2014. 68 Innovation model Of Teaching on 2013 Curriculum3 Yogyakarta: Ar Ruzz Media.
  25. Slamet, J. 2016. Learning Readiness and Interest in asking student capability in biological learning in senior high school. Proceedings of National Conference. Physics Department, University of Jember
  26. Smagorinsky, P. 2018. Deconflating the ZPD and Instructional Scaffolding: Retranslating and Reconceiving The Zone Of Proximal Development As The Zone of Next Development. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction.16:70-75
  27. Steedly, K.M., A. Schwartz, M. Levin, S.D. Luke. 2008. Social skill and academic achievement. Evidence for Education. National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities.3(2).
  28. Suyanto, S.A. 2017. Reflection On The Implementation Of A New Curriculum In Indonesia: A crucial problem on school readiness. AIP Conference Proceeding:100001-100008
  29. Vale, R. D. 2013. The Value of Asking Questions. The American Society for Cell Biology. 24: 680-682.
  30. Vygotsky, 1997. Thought and Language. Cambridge.London: The Mitt Press.

Joko Slamet, Wachju Subchan and Jekti Prihatin. (2018); DEVELOPMENT OF REAL QUESTING LEARNING MODEL FOR BIOLOGY LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 6 (07), 212-218, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7355

Joko Slamet
University of Jember

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7355      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7355

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 25 | No. of Views: 110