Vol. 6 (07) pp. 1137-1142 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7468

ADAPTABILITY OF DIFFERENT ROOT END FILLING MATERIALS.

, , and
  • Assistant researcher, National Research Centre, Egypt.
  • Professor of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Egypt.
  • Researcher Professor of restorative Dentistry, National Research Centre, Egypt.
26 Downloads 84 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the adaptability of TotalFill, Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Intermediate restorative material (IRM) on human extracted teeth. Methods: Thirty single rooted freshly extracted human teeth with mature apices were selected. Clinical crowns were sectioned at the cement-enamel junction to create a standardized length of about 16 mm. The root canals were instrumented in a crown down technique by using Protaper rotary nickel titanium files. Root canals were obturated with Gutta-percha and resin based sealer. The root-ends were then resected perpendicular to the long axes of the teeth and ultrasonically prepared to receive a retrofilling. Under scanning electron microscopy, the gaps between the material and dentinal wall were measured. Results: The maximum mean gap measurements were found in IRM, whereas the minimum mean gap measurements were found in TotalFill. Conclusion: None of the tested materials had a perfect marginal adaptation to the walls of the prepared retro cavity.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Harty FJ, Parkins BJ, Wengraf AM. The success rate of apicectomy. A retrospective study of 1,016 cases.Br Dent J 1970 Nov; 129: 407-413.
  2. Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR. Root end filling materials: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996 Aug; 12:161-78.
  3. Ribeiro DA. Do endodontic compounds induce genetic damage? A comprehensive review. Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 2008 Feb; 105:251-6.
  4. Phillips RW, Love DR. The effect of certain additive agents on the physical properties of zinc oxide-eugenol mixtures. J Dent Res1961 Mar; 40:294-303.
  5. Weine FS. Endodontic Therapy. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1982. P498-502.
  6. Torabinejad M, Walton RE. Principles and Practice of Endodontics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002. P 275-278.
  7. Hendra LP. EBA cement. A practical system for all cementation. J Br Endod Soc 1970 summer; 4:28-32.
  8. Oynick J, Oynick T. A study of a new material for retrograde fillings. J Endod 1978 Jul; 4:203-206.
  9. Fernandez-Yanez Sanchez A, Leco-Berrocal MI, Martinez- Conzalez JM. Meta-analysis of filler materials in periapical surgery. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal 2008 Mar; 13: E 180-5.
  10. Stabholz A, Friedmans S, Abed J. Marginal adaptation of retrograde fillings and its correlation with sealability. J Endod 1985; 11:218-23.
  11. Tanzilli JP, Raphael D, Moodink RM. A comparsion of the marginal adaptation of retrograde techniques: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 50:74-80.
  12. Fogel HM, Peikoff MD. Microleakage of root-end filling materials. J Endod. 2001; 27:456?8.
  13. Moodnik RM, Levey MH, Besen MA, Borden BG. Retrograde amalgam filling: A scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod. 1975; 1:28?31.
  14. Torabinejad M, Smith PW, Kettering JD, Pitt Ford TR. Comparative investigation of marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate and other commonly used root-end filling materials. J Endod. 1995 Jun; 21(6):295-9.
  15. Orosco FA, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, Bernardineli N, de Moraes IG. Sealing ability, marginal adaptation and their correla tion using three root-end filling materials as apical plugs. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Mar-Apr; 18(2):127-34.
  16. Walsh RM, Woodmansey KF, Glickman GN, He J. Evaluation of compressive strength of hydraulic silicate-based root-end filling materials. J Endod 2014; 40:969?72.
  17. Zhang H, Shen Y, Ruse ND, Haapasalo M. Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2009 Jul; 35(7):1051-5.
  18. Shipper G, Grossman ES, Botha AJ, Cleaton-Jones PE. Marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) compared with amalgam as a root-end filling material: a low-vacuum (LV) versus high-vacuum (HV) SEM study. Int Endod J 2004; 37:325?36.
  19. Xavier CB, Weismann R, de Oliveira MG, Demarco FF, Pozza DH. Root-end filling materials: apical microleakage and marginal adaptation. J Endod 2005; 31: 539?42.
  20. Gondim E, Zaia AA, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Investigation of the marginal adaptation of root-end filling materials in root-end cavities prepared with ultrasonic tips. Int Endod J 2003; 36:491?9.
  21. Deveaux E, Hildelbert P, Neut C, Romond C. Bacterial microleakage of Cavit, IRM, TERM, and Fermit: a 21-day in vitro study. J Endod 1999; 25:653-9.

How to Cite This Article

Sherif El Shershaby, Ehab Hassanien, Shehab El Din Saber and Mohamed Zaazou. (2018); ADAPTABILITY OF DIFFERENT ROOT END FILLING MATERIALS., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 6 (07), 1137-1142, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7468

Corresponding Author

Sherif El Shershaby
Assistant researcher, National Research Centre, Egypt
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.