17Dec 2019

METHODS TO ALTER SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY OF DENTAL IMPLANTS

Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

A surging significance in implant dentistry has demanded and hence promoted research within the field to bring about the current trends in dental implantology.Surface topography and the modifications brought about to improve the surface characteristics are promising for the betterment of osseointegration resulted.This article reveiws different surface modifications,methods to improve the surface characteristics of dental implants and the future of dental implant surfaces.

  1. Svanborg LM. On the importance of nanometer structures for implant incorporation in bone tissue. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology at Malmo University; 2011.
  2. Grassi S, Piattelli A, de Figueiredo LC, Feres M, de Melo L, Iezzi G, et al. Histologic evaluation of early human bone response to different implant surfaces. J Periodontol 2006;77:1736-43.
  3. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J 2001;10 Suppl 2:S96-101.
  4. Ballo AM, Omar O, Xia W, Palmquist A. Dental implant surfacesphysicochemical properties, biological performance and trends. Implant Dentistry-A Rapidly Evolving Practice 2011:1:19-56.
  5. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:Suppl 4, 172-84.
  6. Guo CY, Matinlinna JP, Tang AT. Effects of surface charges on dental implants: Past, present, and future. Int J Biomater 2012;2012:381535.
  7. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Infl uence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
  8. Kohles SS, Clark MB, Brown CA, Kenealy JN. Direct assessment of profi lometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:510-6.
  9. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.
  10. Brett PM, Harle J, Salih V, Mihoc R, Olsen I, Jones FH, et al. Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone 2004;35:124-33.
  11. Aljateeli M, Wang HL. Implant microdesigns and their impact on osseointegration. Implant dentistry. 2013 Apr 1;22(2):127-32.
  12. Barfeie A, Wilson J, Rees J. Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration. British dental journal. 2015 Mar;218(5):E9.
  13. Dahiya V, Shukla P, Gupta S. Surface topography of dental implants: A review. Journal of Dental Implants. 2014 Jan 1;4(1):66.
  14. Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2000 Nov 1;84(5):522-34.
  15. Hemlata Garg et al., Implant Surface Modifications.Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2012 April, Vol-6(2): 319-324.
  16. Gotfredsen K, Wennerberg A, Johansson C, Skovgaard LT, Hj?rting-Hansen E. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1223-31.
  17. Ivanoff CJ, Hallgren C, Widmark G, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of TiO (2) blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:128-34 18.
  18. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. Bone and soft-tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: An experimental study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:323-32. 22.
  19. London RM, Roberts FA, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O?Neal RB. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: Bone contact in vivo in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:369-76
  20. Rahmitasari F, Ishida Y, Kurahashi K, Matsuda T, Watanabe M, Ichikawa T. PEEK with Reinforced Materials and Modifications for Dental Implant Applications. Dentistry journal. 2017 Dec 15;5(4):35.
  21. Andreas Schwitalla, Wolf-Dieter M?ller, PEEK Dental Implants: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Oral Implantology. 2013;39(6):743-749.

[Veena Paul, Aby Mathew, Elizabeth k Sunny and Shoma Sasidharan (2019); METHODS TO ALTER SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY OF DENTAL IMPLANTS Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Dec). 1-8] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

DR. VEENA PAUL
KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10116      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10116

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 468 | No. of Views: 882