12Nov 2018

ENSEIGNEMENT MAGISTRAL INTERACTIF DE LEMBRYOLOGIE: APPORT PEDAGOGIQUE DE LA FTOPATHOLOGIE.

  • D?partement d?Histologie-Embryologie, Facult? de M?decine de Tunis, Universit? de Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisie.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Background: The fundamental reason for studying embryology is to understand the genesis of the birth defects. To increase the effectiveness of the passive learning, it is possible to teach embryology through clinical applications. Objective: To evaluate the educational impact of the fetal autopsy pathology in the understanding of embryology. Methods: Based on the objectives stated in the digestive system development course, the pedagogic approach was to alternate between normal development and malformations using fetopathological iconographies. The evaluation was based on a simple, rapid and representative post-test questionnaire, dealing with six aspects of the teaching method: course form, relevance of fetopathological iconographies, learning efficiency and student-teacher communication. One hundred and ninety-six students, divided into four groups, were asked to answer the questionnaire. Results: The response rate was 98.98%. Most of the students approved the interactive learning. They particularly considered the use of the clinical cases very useful for effective and active learning. The major disadvantage was insufficient time devoted to the course. Conclusion: The active learning of embryology through clinical applications enhances the students? understanding and performance as it engages them in discussion and reasoning unlike passive listening. Good time management is essential to counter the massed learning.


  1. Altet M. Le cours magistral universitaire : un discours scientifico-p?dagogique sans articulation enseignement-apprentissage. Recherche & Formation 1994;15:35-44.
  2. Yakovleva NO, Yakovlev EV. Interactive teaching methods in contemporary higher education. Pacific Science Review 2014;16:75-80.
  3. Petit L. Le cours magistral a-t-il un avenir?? ???ditorial??, Distances et m?diations des savoirs, 2015 [En ligne]. Disponible sur : http://dms.revues.org/961.
  4. Carlson BM. Embryology in the medical curriculum. Anat Rec 2002;269:89-98.
  5. Moraes SG, Reis MVA, Mello MFS, Pereira LAV. The usefulness of autopsies as a tool for teaching human embryology. Braz J Morphol Sci?2004;21:117-123.
  6. Moraes SG, Pereira LAV. A multimedia approach for teaching human embryology: Development and evaluation of a methodology. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger 2010;192:388-95.
  7. Scott KM, Charles AR, Holland AJ. Clinical embryology teaching: is it relevant anymore? ANZ J Surg 2013;83:709-12.
  8. Zaletel I, Marić G, Gazibara T, Rakočević J, Labudović Borović M, Pu?ka? N et al. Relevance and attitudes toward histology and embryology course through the eyes of freshmen and senior medical students: Experience from Serbia. Ann Anat 2016;208:217-21.
  9. Moxham BJ, Hennon H, Lignier B, Plaisant O. An assessment of the anatomical knowledge of laypersons and their attitudes towards the clinical importance of gross anatomy in medicine. Ann Anat 2016;208:194-203.
  10. Romainville Esquisse d?une didactique universitaire. Revue francophone de gestion 2004:5-24.
  11. Bernard JL, Reyes P. Apprendre, en m?decine (2). P?dagogie M?dicale 2001;2:235-41.

[Sihem Darouich. (2018); ENSEIGNEMENT MAGISTRAL INTERACTIF DE LEMBRYOLOGIE: APPORT PEDAGOGIQUE DE LA FTOPATHOLOGIE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Nov). 538-545] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Sihem Darouich


DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8028      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8028